Marian C McCarty1, Stephen J Chen1, Jeryl D English1, F Kasper2. 1. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex. 2. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex. Electronic address: Fred.K.Kasper@uth.tmc.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the effect of print orientation and ultraviolet (UV) light curing duration on the dimensional accuracy of a clear aligner design fabricated directly using 3-dimensional (3D) printing. METHODS: A master clear aligner design file was 3D printed on a stereolithography printer using 3 different build angles with respect to the build platform: parallel (Horizontal), perpendicular (Vertical), and 45° (45-Degree) (n = 10/group). The 45° orientation then was used to print aligners for 3 postprint processing treatment groups: 0 minutes of UV light and heat exposure (No Cure); 20 minutes of UV light exposure at 80oC (20 Minute), and 40 minutes of UV light exposure at 80oC (40 Minute) (n = 10/group). Each part was digitally scanned and superimposed with the input file for 3D deviation analysis. A generalized linear mixed model and post-hoc Tukey contrasts were applied for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Difficulties were encountered in optical scanning of 3D-printed aligners, resulting in the exclusion of some samples and the No Cure group from the analysis. The average positive and negative deviations were not statistically significantly different among the print orientations, and postprint processing conditions were analyzed and fell within limits of clinical acceptability (0.250 mm). Color deviation maps illustrated localized areas of dimensional deviation that may affect the clinical utility of the printed aligner design. CONCLUSIONS: The print orientation and postprint curing duration have little effect on the overall accuracy of the 3D-printed aligner design under the conditions investigated. However, the potential effects of location-specific deviations on the clinical utility of 3D-printed aligners should be considered in future studies.
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the effect of print orientation and ultraviolet (UV) light curing duration on the dimensional accuracy of a clear aligner design fabricated directly using 3-dimensional (3D) printing. METHODS: A master clear aligner design file was 3D printed on a stereolithography printer using 3 different build angles with respect to the build platform: parallel (Horizontal), perpendicular (Vertical), and 45° (45-Degree) (n = 10/group). The 45° orientation then was used to print aligners for 3 postprint processing treatment groups: 0 minutes of UV light and heat exposure (No Cure); 20 minutes of UV light exposure at 80oC (20 Minute), and 40 minutes of UV light exposure at 80oC (40 Minute) (n = 10/group). Each part was digitally scanned and superimposed with the input file for 3D deviation analysis. A generalized linear mixed model and post-hoc Tukey contrasts were applied for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Difficulties were encountered in optical scanning of 3D-printed aligners, resulting in the exclusion of some samples and the No Cure group from the analysis. The average positive and negative deviations were not statistically significantly different among the print orientations, and postprint processing conditions were analyzed and fell within limits of clinical acceptability (0.250 mm). Color deviation maps illustrated localized areas of dimensional deviation that may affect the clinical utility of the printed aligner design. CONCLUSIONS: The print orientation and postprint curing duration have little effect on the overall accuracy of the 3D-printed aligner design under the conditions investigated. However, the potential effects of location-specific deviations on the clinical utility of 3D-printed aligners should be considered in future studies.