Emily C Alberto1, Swathi Jagannath2, Maureen E McCusker3, Susan Keller4, Ivan Marsic5, Aleksandra Sarcevic2, Karen J O'Connell6, Randall S Burd1. 1. Division of Trauma and Burns, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 2. College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Office of Institutional Research and Decision Support, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA. 4. Department of Nursing Science Professional Practice and Quality, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 5. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA. 6. Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Non-routine events (NREs) are atypical or unusual occurrences in a pre-defined process. Although some NREs in high-risk clinical settings have no adverse effects on patient care, others can potentially cause serious patient harm. A unified strategy for identifying and describing NREs in these domains will facilitate the comparison of results between studies. METHODS: We conducted a literature search in PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE to identify studies related to NREs in high-risk domains and evaluated the methods used for event observation and description. We applied The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO) taxonomy (cause, impact, domain, type, prevention, and mitigation) to the descriptions of NREs from the literature. RESULTS: We selected 25 articles that met inclusion criteria for review. Real-time documentation of NREs was more common than a retrospective video review. Thirteen studies used domain experts as observers and seven studies validated observations with interrater reliability. Using the JCAHO taxonomy, "cause" was the most frequently applied classification method, followed by "impact," "type," "domain," and "prevention and mitigation." CONCLUSIONS: NREs are frequent in high-risk medical settings. Strengths identified in several studies included the use of multiple observers with domain expertise and validation of the event ascertainment approach using interrater reliability. By applying the JCAHO taxonomy to the current literature, we provide an example of a structured approach that can be used for future analyses of NREs.
INTRODUCTION: Non-routine events (NREs) are atypical or unusual occurrences in a pre-defined process. Although some NREs in high-risk clinical settings have no adverse effects on patient care, others can potentially cause serious patient harm. A unified strategy for identifying and describing NREs in these domains will facilitate the comparison of results between studies. METHODS: We conducted a literature search in PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE to identify studies related to NREs in high-risk domains and evaluated the methods used for event observation and description. We applied The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO) taxonomy (cause, impact, domain, type, prevention, and mitigation) to the descriptions of NREs from the literature. RESULTS: We selected 25 articles that met inclusion criteria for review. Real-time documentation of NREs was more common than a retrospective video review. Thirteen studies used domain experts as observers and seven studies validated observations with interrater reliability. Using the JCAHO taxonomy, "cause" was the most frequently applied classification method, followed by "impact," "type," "domain," and "prevention and mitigation." CONCLUSIONS: NREs are frequent in high-risk medical settings. Strengths identified in several studies included the use of multiple observers with domain expertise and validation of the event ascertainment approach using interrater reliability. By applying the JCAHO taxonomy to the current literature, we provide an example of a structured approach that can be used for future analyses of NREs.
Authors: Nathan J Curtis; Godwin Dennison; Chris S B Brown; Peter J Hewett; George B Hanna; Andrew R L Stevenson; Nader K Francis Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Douglas A Wiegmann; Andrew W ElBardissi; Joseph A Dearani; Richard C Daly; Thoralf M Sundt Journal: Surgery Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Sarah E Henrickson Parker; Aaron A Laviana; Rishi K Wadhera; Douglas A Wiegmann; Thoralf M Sundt Journal: World J Surg Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: William Runciman; Peter Hibbert; Richard Thomson; Tjerk Van Der Schaaf; Heather Sherman; Pierre Lewalle Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: You Chen; Mhd Wael Alrifai; Yang Gong; Rhodes Evan; Jason Slagle; Bradley Malin; Daniel France Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform Date: 2022-06-06