Literature DB >> 33249099

A call for action on the development and implementation of new methodologies for safety assessment of chemical-based products in the EU - A short communication.

Derek J Knight1, Hubert Deluyker2, Qasim Chaudhry3, Jean-Marc Vidal4, Alie de Boer5.   

Abstract

Safety assessment of chemicals and products in the European Union (EU) is based on decades of practice using primarily animal toxicity studies to model hazardous effects in humans. Nevertheless, there has been a long-standing ethical concern about using experimental animals. In addition, animal models may fail to predict adverse effects in humans. This has provided a strong motivation to develop and use new approach methodologies and other alternative sources of evidence. A key challenge for this is integration of evidence from different sources. This paper is a call for action with regard to development, validation, and implementation of modern safety assessment approaches for human health assessment by means of focused applied research and development with three strands: (a) to improve screening and priority setting, (b) to enhance and partially replace animal studies under the current regulatory schemes and eventually (c) to fully replace animal studies, while achieving at least the same level of protection. For this gradual but systematic replacement of animal studies, a long-term concerted and coordinated effort with clear goals is needed at EU level, as a societal and political choice, to plan and motivate research and innovation in regulatory safety assessment.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3Rs; Animal welfare; Cosmetics; Food safety; Medicines; New approach methods; Next generation risk assessment; Non-animal-based testing; Risk assessment; Toxicology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33249099     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of endocrine disruptive properties of PFOS: EFSA/ECHA guidance case study utilising AOP networks and alternative methods.

Authors:  Marek Pípal; Linus Wiklund; Sara Caccia; Anna Beronius
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  The use of Bayesian methodology in the development and validation of a tiered assessment approach towards prediction of rat acute oral toxicity.

Authors:  James W Firman; Mark T D Cronin; Philip H Rowe; Elizaveta Semenova; John E Doe
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 3.  A matter of trust: Learning lessons about causality will make qAOPs credible.

Authors:  Nicoleta Spînu; Mark T D Cronin; Judith C Madden; Andrew P Worth
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2022-02

4.  Endocrine Disruptors in a New Era of Predictive Toxicology and Dealing With the "More is Different" Challenge.

Authors:  Terje Svingen
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-27

5.  Aerogels are not regulated as nanomaterials, but can be assessed by tiered testing and grouping strategies for nanomaterials.

Authors:  Johannes G Keller; Martin Wiemann; Sibylle Gröters; Kai Werle; Antje Vennemann; Robert Landsiedel; Wendel Wohlleben
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2021-05-19

6.  A framework for chemical safety assessment incorporating new approach methodologies within REACH.

Authors:  Nicholas Ball; Remi Bars; Philip A Botham; Andreea Cuciureanu; Mark T D Cronin; John E Doe; Tatsiana Dudzina; Timothy W Gant; Marcel Leist; Bennard van Ravenzwaay
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Extrapolating from acute to chronic toxicity in vitro.

Authors:  Peter Macko; Taina Palosaari; Maurice Whelan
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.500

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.