Literature DB >> 33249092

A graded prognostic model for patients surviving 3 years or more (GPM ≥ 3Ys) after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis.

Yasunori Sato1, Masaaki Yamamoto2, Toru Serizawa3, Kei-Ichiro Yamada4, Yoshinori Higuchi5, Hidetoshi Kasuya6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: As more cancer patients with brain metastases (BMs) are surviving longer due to recent advancements in various treatment modalities, we developed a grading system for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)-treated BM patients with long survival. This is a Graded Prognostic Model for Patients Surviving 3 Years or More (GPM ≥ 3Ys).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, using clinical factor-survival time analysis of 3237 patients in whom gamma knife (GK) SRS was performed by the second author (test cohort), we developed the GPM ≥ 3Ys based on survival ≥3 years as the objective variable. The validity of this model was then tested using another series of 3317 patients independently undergoing GK SRS performed by the third author (verification cohort). Number of patients surviving 3 years or more were 289 (8.9%) and 348 (10.5%), respectively.
RESULTS: Using the test series, among various pre-SRS clinical factors, noted below, five were shown to be highly correlated with survival of ≥3 years. Therefore, we assigned scores for these five factors, i.e., "tumor numbers 1/2-4/≥5 (score; 6/1/0)", "female/male (5/0)", "KPS ≥80%/<80% (5/0)", "primary cancers of breast/lung/gastrointestinal tract/other (score; 1/0/3/0)", "controlled primary cancer/not (8/0)" and "existing extra-cerebral metastases/not (5/0). Patients were categorized into four grades according to the sum of scores, i.e., 0-9, 10-19, 20-29 and 30-36. Post-SRS mean survival times (MSTs) differed significantly (p < 0.0001) with no overlapping of 95% confidence intervals (CIs) among the four grades. Also, in the verification series, MSTs differed significantly (p < 0.0001) with no overlapping of 95% CI among the four grades of the GPM ≥ 3Ys system.
CONCLUSION: Although this was a retrospective study, the GPM ≥ 3Ys system was shown to be very useful to physicians selecting among more aggressive treatment modalities for patients in whom longer survival can be expected.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain metastases; Gamma knife; Grading system; Prognosis; Radiation therapy; Radiosurgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 33249092     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  4 in total

1.  Validation of a Graded Prognostic Model in Patients With Brain Metastases Treated With Whole-brain Radiotherapy Instead of Radiosurgery.

Authors:  Carsten Nieder; Bård Mannsåker; Rosalba Yobuta
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Stereotactic radiosurgery results for brain metastasis patients with renal cancer: A validity study of Renal Graded Prognostic Assessment and proposal of a new grading index (JLGK2101 Study).

Authors:  Rena Okuno-Ito; Masaaki Yamamoto; Yasunori Sato; Toru Serizawa; Jun Kawagishi; Takashi Shuto; Shoji Yomo; Atsuya Akabane; Kyoko Aoyagi; Takuya Kawabe; Yasuhiro Kikuchi; Kiyoshi Nakasaki; Masazumi Gondo; Yoshinori Higuchi; Toru Takebayashi
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-11-12

3.  The Usefulness of Prognostic Tools in Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Joanna Kufel-Grabowska; Anna Niwińska; Barbara S Radecka; Shan Ali; Tomasz Mandat; Renata Duchnowska
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Long-Term Survival after Linac-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Radiotherapy with a Micro-Multileaf Collimator for Brain Metastasis.

Authors:  Ryosuke Matsuda; Masatoshi Hasegawa; Tetsuro Tamamoto; Nobuyoshi Inooka; Mei Nikimoto; Tomoko Ochi; Toshiteru Miyasaka; Shigeto Hontsu; Kaori Yamaki; Sachiko Miura; Takayuki Morimoto; Takaaki Mitsui; Takanori Furuta; Shohei Yokoyama; Masashi Kotsugi; Shuichi Yamada; Ichiro Nakagawa; Young-Soo Park; Hiroyuki Nakase
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.109

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.