Literature DB >> 33248966

Long-Term Prognosis of Patients With Coronary Microvascular Disease Using Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.

Wenli Zhou1, Jonan Chun Yin Lee2, Siu Ting Leung3, Alta Lai3, Tang-Fei Lee3, Jeanie Betsy Chiang2, Yuet Wong Cheng4, Hiu-Lam Chan5, Kai-Hang Yiu6, Victor King-Man Goh7, Dudley John Pennell8, Ming-Yen Ng9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the prognosis of coronary microvascular disease (CMD) as determined by stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with ischemic symptoms but without significant coronary artery disease (CAD).
BACKGROUND: Patients with CMD have poorer prognosis with various cardiac diseases. The myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) derived from noninvasive stress perfusion CMR has been established to diagnose microvascular angina with a threshold MPRI <1.4. The prognosis of CMD as determined by MPRI is unknown.
METHODS: Chest pain patients without epicardial CAD or myocardial disease from January 2009 to December 2017 were retrospectively included from 3 imaging centers in Hong Kong (HK). Stress perfusion CMR examinations were performed using either adenosine or adenosine triphosphate. Adequate stress was assessed by achieving splenic switch-off sign. Measurement of MPRI was performed in all stress perfusion CMR scans. Patients were followed for major adverse cardiovascular events defined as all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), epicardial CAD development, heart failure hospitalization and non-fatal stroke.
RESULTS: A total of 218 patients were studied (mean age 59 ± 12 years; 49.5% male) and the average MPRI of that cohort was 1.56 ± 0.33. Females and a history of hyperlipidemia were predictors of lower MPRI. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred in 15.6% of patients during a median follow-up of 5.5 years (interquartile range: 4.6 to 6.8 years). The optimal cutoff value of MPRI in predicting MACE was found with a threshold MPRI ≤1.47. Patients with MPRI ≤1.47 had three-fold increased risk of MACE compared with those with MPRI >1.47 (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.58 to 6.25; p = 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression after adjusting for age and hypertension demonstrated that MPRI was an independent predictor of MACE (HR: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.34; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Stress perfusion CMR-derived MPRI is an independent imaging marker that predicts MACE in patients with ischemic symptom and no overt CAD over the medium term.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MPRI; coronary microvascular disease; prognosis; stress CMR

Year:  2020        PMID: 33248966     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.09.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  13 in total

Review 1.  Coronary Arterial Function and Disease in Women With No Obstructive Coronary Arteries.

Authors:  Harmony R Reynolds; C Noel Bairey Merz; Colin Berry; Rohit Samuel; Jacqueline Saw; Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Ana Carolina do A H de Souza; Robert Sykes; Viviany R Taqueti; Janet Wei
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 2.  State of the field: cellular and exosomal therapeutic approaches in vascular regeneration.

Authors:  Evan Paul Tracy; Virginia Stielberg; Gabrielle Rowe; Daniel Benson; Sara S Nunes; James B Hoying; Walter Lee Murfee; Amanda Jo LeBlanc
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 3.  Vasomotor Dysfunction in Patients with Ischemia and Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Amr Abouelnour; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-11-26

Review 4.  Coronary Microvascular Angina: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Francesco Spione; Victor Arevalos; Rami Gabani; Manel Sabaté; Salvatore Brugaletta
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-30

Review 5.  Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Chest Pain.

Authors:  Ashley S Manchanda; Alan C Kwan; Mariko Ishimori; Louise E J Thomson; Debiao Li; Daniel S Berman; C Noel Bairey Merz; Caroline Jefferies; Janet Wei
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-15

6.  Subclinical hepatic fibrosis is associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction by myocardial perfusion reserve index: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alan C Kwan; Janet Wei; Brian P Lee; Eric Luong; Gerran Salto; Trevor-Trung Nguyen; Patrick G Botting; Yunxian Liu; David Ouyang; Joseph E Ebinger; Debiao Li; Mazen Noureddin; Louise Thomson; Daniel S Berman; C Noel Bairey Merz; Susan Cheng
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 7.  Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: PET, CMR and CT Assessment.

Authors:  Elisabetta Tonet; Graziella Pompei; Evelina Faragasso; Alberto Cossu; Rita Pavasini; Giulia Passarini; Matteo Tebaldi; Gianluca Campo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 8.  Role of advanced imaging in COVID-19 cardiovascular complications.

Authors:  Federica Catapano; Livia Marchitelli; Giulia Cundari; Francesco Cilia; Giuseppe Mancuso; Giacomo Pambianchi; Nicola Galea; Paolo Ricci; Carlo Catalano; Marco Francone
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-02-24

Review 9.  Contemporary Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in the Management of Patients with Suspected or Known Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  George Bazoukis; Stamatis S Papadatos; Archontoula Michelongona; Konstantinos Lampropoulos; Dimitrios Farmakis; Vassilis Vassiliou
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 10.  Microvascular Angina: Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Haider Aldiwani; Suzan Mahdai; Ghaith Alhatemi; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.