| Literature DB >> 33248817 |
Eduardo Vadillo1, Keiko Taniguchi-Ponciano2, Constantino Lopez-Macias3, Roberto Carvente-Garcia4, Hector Mayani1, Eduardo Ferat-Osorio5, Guillermo Flores-Padilla6, Javier Torres7, Cesar Raul Gonzalez-Bonilla8, Abraham Majluf9, Alejandra Albarran-Sanchez6, Juan Carlos Galan6, Eduardo Peña-Martínez2, Gloria Silva-Román2, Sandra Vela-Patiño2, Aldo Ferreira-Hermosillo2, Claudia Ramirez-Renteria2, Nancy Adriana Espinoza-Sanchez1, Rosana Pelayo-Camacho10, Laura Bonifaz3, Lourdes Arriaga-Pizano3, Carlos Mata-Lozano4, Sergio Andonegui-Elguera2, Niels Wacher11, Francisco Blanco-Favela12, Roberto De-Lira-Barraza6, Humberto Villanueva-Compean6, Alejandra Esquivel-Pineda6, Rubén Ramírez-Montes-de-Oca6, Carlos Anda-Garay6, Maura Noyola-García6, Luis Guizar-García6, Arturo Cerbulo-Vazquez3, Horacio Zamudio-Meza3, Daniel Marrero-Rodríguez13, Moises Mercado14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2, the etiological agent causing COVID-19, has infected more than 27 million people with over 894000 deaths worldwide since its emergence in December 2019. Factors for severe diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity have been identified however, the precise pathogenesis is poorly understood. To understand its pathophysiology and to develop effective therapeutic strategies, it is essential to define the prevailing immune cellular subsets.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Critically ill; Emergency myelopoiesis; Immune cell profile; SARS-CoV-2; Trained immunity; scRNAseq
Year: 2020 PMID: 33248817 PMCID: PMC7670924 DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.11.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Res ISSN: 0188-4409 Impact factor: 2.235
Clinical and biochemical characteristics of critically ill patients with COVID-19 (OW: overweight, DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus, BMI: body mass index)
| Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | Patient 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, yrs | 57 | 46 | 43 | 41 | 52 |
| BMI, Kg/cm2 | 29 | 26.3 | 31 | 24 | 29 |
| Comorbidities | OW | None | DM, OW | None | DM, OW |
| Admission to intub, days | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| Leukocytes per mm3 | 9130 | 8760 | 7760 | 8900 | 5060 |
| Lymphocytes, x 103/mm3 | 650 | 520 | 160 | 1130 | 1600 |
| Hb, g/dL | 16.4 | 15.9 | 17 | 12.9 | 15.8 |
| Platelets, x 103/mm3 | 193 | 357 | 380 | 523 | 169 |
| CRP, mg/L | 23.6 | 35 | 11.9 | 27 | 11.6 |
| Procalcitonin, ng/mL | 2.32 | 1.87 | 0.07 | 0.22 | 0.33 |
| D-Dimer, ng/mL | 2410 | 3320 | 1100 | 2980 | 2020 |
| Fibrinogen, mg/dL | 834 | 788 | 753 | 789 | 773 |
| Final outcome | Dead | Dead | Dead | Alive | Alive |
Figure 1Cell populations identified in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Panel A. depicts the t-SNE from COVID-19 critically ill patients scRNAseq data. Twelve clusters are represented by immature myeloid populations such as band neutrophils, metamyelocytes, promyelocytes-myelocytes, monocytoid precursor, immature monocytes. Mature lineages such as segmented neutrophils, mature monocytes and finally monocyte-macrophages are observed. Scarce lymphoid cell populations, represented by B, T and NK cells are present in these patients. In contrast, panel B. shows the t-SNE from scRNAseq data from healthy donors with lymphoid T, Th1, NK and B cells predominance compared to monocytes.
Figure 2Molecular markers identifying cell clusters. Panel A. portrays the hierarchical cluster from the differentially expressed genes among the cell populations identified in the COVID-19 patients. Panels B, C, and D. shows the t-SNE displaying expression of S100A9 and S100A8, ITGAM and ITGAL, respectively, in myeloid cell subsets depicting immature features. Whereas panels E, F, and G. Shows mature monocyte cell subset expressing CD14, LYZ and S100A9 genes, B cells expressing CD79A, CD79B, CD19 and NK cells expressing NKG7 and GZMA, respectively.
Figure 3Trajectory analysis. Panel A. Trajectory analysis with pseudotime represented potential transitional states. Node 2 gathers the immature cell populations and showed time 0, follow throughout the trajectory path to node 1 were it bifurcates into 2 nodes, the second bifurcation showed the mature or differentiated cell states. Panel B. depicts the cell populations identified by their transcriptomes and their potential transitional states according to pseudotime. As expected, metamyelocytes, promyelocytes-myelocytes and immature monocytes are in node 2 and mature monocytes and B and T lymphocytes, along with NK cells were among the most mature cells in the opposite node.
Figure 4Gene Ontology terms. Gene ontology results in myeloid cell subsets are represented in panel A. myeloid cell activation in immune response as well as granulocyte and leukocyte activation, B. Iron metabolism and anion homeostasis, C. Cell cycle control, DNA and RNA processing and D) defense response to virus, response to type 1 interferon and innate immune response.
Figure 5Immunity trained gene expression. Violin plots show gene expression of CEBPβ, IRF1, FOSL2 and ATF3 in the critically ill COVID-19 patients immune cells analyzed in panels A, B, C, and D respectively.