| Literature DB >> 33248632 |
Yinglian Zhu1, Liping Guo2, Wenting Tang2, Qingli Yang2.
Abstract
This study aimed to improve the nutritional quality of Harbin dry sausages using natural plant-based Jerusalem artichoke powder (JAP) and olive oil as animal fat replacers. Low-fat Harbin dry sausages were manufactured with 2 different formulations containing JAP and olive oil as pork fat replacers. The texture, rheological properties, microstructure, water holding capacity, muscle protein structure, physicochemical indices, microbiological characteristics, and sensory evaluation of the sausages were analyzed. The result showed that Harbin dry sausages with JAP and olive oil were healthier than control sausages based on the lower fat content and improved fatty acid composition. Scanning electron microscopy showed gel network formation in sausages with a high JAP content. Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance illustrated that the water-holding capacity of the modified sausages was improved, suggesting that the replacers enhanced protein gel formation by changes in C-H stretching and bending vibrations, a reduction in α-helixes, and increases in β-sheets and random coils accompanying the exposure of reactive groups and microenvironment of the tertiary structure. Dynamic rheological and texture tests indicated that the replacers improved the elasticity of sausages. The reduction of fat and addition of replacers significantly enhanced lipid oxidative resistance. Overall, JAP and olive oil improved the fatty acid composition, gel structure, lipid oxidative resistance, and sensory quality of the sausages. These results may contribute to the development of healthy meat products to further reduce animal fat.Entities:
Keywords: Jerusalem artichoke powder; LF-NMR; Raman spectroscopy; fat replacer; olive oil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33248632 PMCID: PMC7704733 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Fatty acid and fat contents.
| Physicochemical indexes | Treatments | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Group A | Group B | |
| Fat content (%) | 9.32 ± 1.11a | 7.76 ± 0.58b | 6.17 ± 0.39c |
| Fatty acids (%) | |||
| Tricosane acid C 23:0 | 0.51 ± 0.00c | 0.74 ± 0.00a | 0.68 ± 0.01b |
| Octadecenoic acid C18:1 | 0.51 ± 0.01c | 0.74 ± 0.00a | 0.68 ± 0.01b |
| Margaric acid C17:0 | 0.51 ± 0.02 | ud | ud |
| Miristic acid C14:0 | 1.04 ± 0.02a | 0.74 ± 0.01b | 0.68 ± 0.00c |
| Eicosadienoic acid C20:2 | 0.51 ± 0.00a | 0.74 ± 0.00a | 0.68 ± 0.01b |
| Eicosenoic acid C20:1 | 0.51 ± 0.01c | 0.74 ± 0.01a | 0.68 ± 0.02b |
| Oleic acid C18:1 | 40.51 ± 2.30b | 44.85 ± 1.55a | 46.62 ± 1.32a |
| Linolenic acid C18:3 | 0.51 ± 0.00c | 0.74 ± 0.02a | 0.68 ± 0.001b |
| Linoleic acid C18:2 | 15.39 ± 0.16a | 15.44 ± 1.32a | 14.86 ± 0.95a |
| Stearic acid C18:0 | 12.82 ± 0.13a | 11.03 ± 0.24b | 10.14 ± 0.06c |
| Palmitic acid C16:0 | 25.13 ± 0.14a | 22.79 ± 0.77b | 22.30 ± 0.94b |
| Palmitoleic acid C16:1 | 2.00 ± 0.10a | 1.78 ± 0.19a | 1.87 ± 0.25a |
| Total SFA | 40.02 ± 0.26a | 35.37 ± 0.77b | 33.80 ± 1.16b |
| Total UFA | 59.48 ± 2.37b | 63.99 ± 0.29a | 65.54 ± 0.37a |
| UFA/SFA | 1.49 ± 0.06c | 1.81 ± 0.05b | 1.94 ± 0.07a |
Control represents sausages contained 90% lean meat and 10% back fat. Group A represents fat-reduction group A contained 90% lean meat, 4% back fat, 2% JAP, and 4% pre-emulsified olive oil. Group B represents fat-reduction group B contained 90% lean meat, 2% back fat, 4% JAP, and 4% pre-emulsified olive oil. The meaning of the control, group A, and group B were consistent with those of other figures and tables in this article. Values are expressed as means ± SD; a, b, and c indicate that values in the same row are significantly different (P < 0.05). In addition, ud indicates undetected.
Abbreviations: JAP, Jerusalem artichoke powder; SFA, saturated fatty acid; UFA, unsaturated fatty acid.
Figure 1Storage modulus G′ (A) and loss modulus G″ (B) curves for sausages during the dynamic frequency test.
Figure 2Summary of changes in the pH (A), water content (B), TBARS (C), and aerobic plate counts (D) in the sausages during storage at 4°C. Values are expressed as means ± SD; a, b, c indicate significant differences between different sausages at the same time (P < 0.05). Abbreviation: TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances.
Figure 3Microstructure at 5,000 × magnification in the 3 groups of sausages (A). Note that a, b, and c denote group A, group B, and the control, respectively. The distribution of T2 (B) and water populations of 3 components (C) in the 3 groups of sausages. P2b, P21, and P22 represent proportions of water closely associated with macromolecules, water located in the myofibrillar network, and free water outside of the myofibrillar network, respectively.
Figure 4Raman spectra for the 3 groups in the region 500–3,500 cm−1 (A) and 2,800–3,100 cm−1 (B).
Figure 5Secondary structure components of the tree group sausages calculated from the amide I band.
Normalized intensities of tryptophan and tyrosine residues in sausages.
| Treatment | Trp band (I760/I1003 cm−1) | Tyr doublet (I850/I830 cm−1) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.836 ± 0.021a | 1.651 ± 0.121a |
| Group A | 0.667 ± 0.043b | 1.013 ± 0.053c |
| Group B | 0.668 ± 0.13b | 1.201 ± 0.049b |
Values are expressed as means ± SD; a, b, and c indicate that values in the same column are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Texture of sausages during storage at 4°C.
| Texture | Storage time (D) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 24 | 30 | |
| Hardness | ||||||
| Control | 1,400.01 ± 165.90a,F | 8,242.17 ± 501.78a,E | 26,380.04 ± 1,466.24a,D. | 36,603.67 ± 951.58a,C | 52,268.38 ± 2,806.25a,B | 56,521.74 ± 1,119.68a,A |
| Group A | 1,503.73 ± 155.58a,F | 8,466.07 ± 329.87a,E | 26,752.52 ± 1,002.86a,D | 36,840.17 ± 1,149.83a,C | 52,640.33 ± 4,332.78a,B | 56,805.27 ± 1,049.26a,A |
| Group B | 1,384.23 ± 144.07a,F | 8,080.11 ± 424.51a,E | 26,126.67 ± 997.31a,D | 35,275.08 ± 1,057.91a,C | 51,587.33 ± 3,505.65a,B | 56,281.33 ± 2,809.91a,A |
| Springiness | ||||||
| Control | 0.525 ± 0.05a,B | 0.795 ± 0.03b,A | 0.669 ± 0.07b,A | 0.776 ± 0.02b,A | 0.763 ± 0.07b,A | 0.737 ± 0.05b,A |
| Group A | 0.557 ± 0.07a,B | 0.809 ± 0.04b,A | 0.679 ± 0.08b,A,B | 0.793 ± 0.10b,A | 0.810 ± 0.07b,A | 0.777 ± 0.12b,A |
| Group B | 0.6167 ± 0.09a,B | 0.936 ± 0.04a,A | 0.854 ± 0.03a,A | 0.956 ± 0.05a,A | 0.947 ± 0.05a,A | 0.927 ± 0.08a,A |
| Cohesiveness | ||||||
| Control | 0.452 ± 0.03b,C | 0.608 ± 0.07a,B | 0.743 ± 0.10a,A | 0.630 ± 0.09a,A,B | 0.568 ± 0.01a,B,C | 0.474 ± 0.06a,C |
| Group A | 0.560 ± 0.05a,C | 0.653 ± 0.06a,A,B | 0.780 ± 0.135a,A | 0.673 ± 0.11a,A,B | 0.655 ± 0.08a,A,B | 0.509 ± 0.04a,C |
| Group B | 0.476 ± 0.05b,C | 0.630 ± 0.01a,B | 0.725 ± 0.09a,A | 0.625 ± 0.06a,B | 0.572 ± 0.04a,B | 0.464 ± 0.02a,C |
| Chewiness | ||||||
| Control | 6,152.73 ± 632.40a,E | 14,933.53 ± 1,174.65a,D | 22,532.50 ± 1,401.57a,B | 25,057.33 ± 1,111.94a,A | 26,264.57 ± 1,012.75b,A | 20,076.81 ± 2,216.89b,C |
| Group A | 5,061.83 ± 659.21b,E | 12,559.48 ± 687.27a,D | 21,645.52 ± 1,193.83a,C | 24,350.27 ± 906.22a,B | 28,122.78 ± 1,607.56a,b,A | 25,814.74 ± 1,065.73a,B |
| Group B | 5,435.87 ± 540.48a,b,E | 13,883.87 ± 1,342.03a,D | 20,950.95 ± 997.10a,C | 24,044.25667 ± 192.60a,B | 29,174.33 ± 1,065.69a,A | 24,142.51 ± 1,635.48a,B |
| Resilience | ||||||
| Control | 0.130 ± 0.02a,E | 0.277 ± 0.01b,A | 0.256 ± 0.03a,A,B | 0.222 ± 0.03b,B,C | 0.204 ± 0.03a,C,D | 0.173 ± 0.04a,D,E |
| Group A | 0.118 ± 0.01a,D | 0.292 ± 0.03a,b,A | 0.282 ± 0.02a,b,A,B | 0.244 ± 0.02a,b,A,B,C | 0.236 ± 0.02a,b,B,C | 0.215 ± 0.02a,C |
| Group B | 0.132 ± 0.01a,D | 0.334 ± 0.04a,A | 0.318 ± 0.02a,A | 0.278 ± 0.02a,B | 0.251 ± 0.01a,B,C | 0.232 ± 0.03a,C |
Values are expressed as means ± SD; a, b, and c indicate that values in the same column are significantly different (P < 0.05); A, B, and C indicate that values in the same row are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Figure 6The sensory properties of the 3 group sausages.