| Literature DB >> 33248618 |
Minghui Wang1, Xiaoyan Lin1, Hongchao Jiao1, Victoria Uyanga1, Jingpeng Zhao1, Xiaojuan Wang1, Haifang Li2, Yunlei Zhou3, Shuhong Sun4, Hai Lin5.
Abstract
The present study aimed to research the effects of cyclic heat environment on the microbial diversity and structure of respiratory tract and cecum of chicken. A total of 360 layer-type pullets at 11 wk of age were subjected to different temperature treatments for 10 wk: constant 22°C; cyclic temperature 22°C to 24°C, 22°C to 26°C, 22°C to 28°C, 22°C to 30°C; the ambient temperature increased from 10:00, reached the set point within 1 h, and maintained until 18:00, thereafter the temperature was restored to 22°C; and the relative humidity was maintained at 60%. The result showed that feed intake of the chickens on ambient temperature 30°C group was significantly lower than that of the chickens on ambient temperature 24°C. The white blood cell, red blood cell, lymphocyte, hemoglobin, and pecked-cell volume content were highest at 24°C on 14, 16, and 18 wk. The ratio of CD3+CD4+/CD3+CD8+ T cells was lowest at 30°C. Meanwhile, the abundance of cecum bacteria in chickens at 30°C was lower than that at 24°C. Cyclic heat environment temperature treatment did not significantly affect the concentration of secretory immunoglobulin A in chicken bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) levels during 10 wk of trial. The diversity index analysis showed that the effect of 24°C on the cecum flora of chickens was optimal. Abundance of Firmicutes bacteria in the lung flora and cecum flora was lower at 30°C than at 24°C group. Similarly, the microorganism, Brevibacillus in the BALF was also significantly lower at 24°C. In conclusion, cyclic 24°C treatment was beneficial for the feed intake, blood routine indexes, microflora structure of the cecum, and respiratory tract in laying pullets.Entities:
Keywords: cecum microbiota; layer-type pullet; mild heat stress; respiratory microbiota
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33248618 PMCID: PMC7704960 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Composition and nutrient contents.
| Ingredients | 10–12 wk of age | 13–18 wk of age | 19–20 wk of age |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corn (7.5% crude protein) | 69 | 69 | 65 |
| Soybean meal (44% crude protein) | 26 | 25 | 25 |
| Limestone | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Soy oil | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Premix | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Calculated nutrient values | |||
| Metabolizable energy, Mcal/kg | 2.910 | 2.887 | 2.841 |
| Crude protein, % | 17.18 | 16.74 | 16.29 |
| Lysine, % | 0.685 | 0.685 | 0.95 |
| Methionine, % | 0.280 | 0.280 | 0.41 |
| Calcium, % | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3.50 |
| Effective phosphorus, % | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.41 |
The premix provides the follow quantities per kilogram of diet: salt, 32%; choline chloride (50%), 18%; vitamin A, 8,800 IU; vitamin D3, 3,300 IU; vitamin K, 2.2 mg; vitamin E, 16.5 IU; cholecalciferol, 2,800 IU; riboflavin, 18.0 mg; niacin, 50 mg; pantothenic acid, 28 mg; biotin, 0.1 mg; folic acid, 0.6 mg; iron (FeSo4 H2o), 55 mg; selenium (NaSeO3), 0.3 mg; copper (CuSo45H20), 5.5 mg; zinc (ZnO), 88 mg; I (KI), 1.7 mg; manganese (MnO), 88 mg.
Effect of cyclic temperature treatment on feed intake of layer-type pullets.
| Weeks | T22C | T24C | T26C | T28C | T30C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | 78.2 ± 1.2 | 76.9 ± 0.8 | 74.2 ± 2.7 | 77.1 ± 2.3 | 74.7 ± 1.6 | 0.509 |
| Week 2 | 86.5 ± 1.6 | 80.2 ± 0.9 | 81.7 ± 2.0 | 81.9 ± 2.1 | 82.7 ± 1.0 | 0.108 |
| Week 3 | 83.0 ± 1.9 | 80.8 ± 3.2 | 79.9 ± 3.0 | 75.6 ± 2.2 | 79.3 ± 0.7 | 0.281 |
| Week 4 | 90.0 ± 2.5a | 88.1 ± 1.2a | 80.7 ± 1.2b | 81.0 ± 1.5b | 85.9 ± 1.0a | 0.000 |
| Week 5 | 87.5 ± 2.1 | 84.8 ± 1.5 | 80.0 ± 1.4 | 79.4 ± 3.5 | 83.4 ± 1.7 | 0.079 |
| Week 6 | 85.7 ± 1.7a | 82.3 ± 3.0a | 82.0 ± 1.5a | 71.6 ± 2.9b | 80.9 ± 1.2a | 0.002 |
| Week 7 | 74.0 ± 4.5 | 94.3 ± 4.1 | 83.0 ± 5.8 | 80.3 ± 8.8 | 74.5 ± 4.5 | 0.130 |
| Week 8 | 84.5 ± 2.3a,b | 89.5 ± 2.0a | 78.5 ± 3.6b | 88.2 ± 5.0a | 76.7 ± 1.7b | 0.028 |
| Average | 83.7 ± 1.2a | 84.6 ± 0.6a | 76.9 ± 1.3b | 76.9 ± 1.3b | 79.6 ± 1.0b | 0.000 |
Means with different superscript letters within the same line differ significantly, P < 0.05; data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 6).
Effect of cyclic temperature treatment on blood cell profiles at 14 wk.
| Item | T22C | T24C | T26C | T28C | T30C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 4 | ||||||
| WBC, 109/L | 180 ± 3 | 195 ± 11 | 180 ± 3 | 183 ± 4 | 178 ± 8 | 0.420 |
| Lymphocyte, 109/L | 146 ± 2 | 170 ± 4 | 148 ± 2 | 147 ± 3 | 146 ± 7 | 0.120 |
| RBC, 1012/L | 2.63 ± 0.05b | 3.06 ± 0.13a | 2.66 ± 0.06b | 2.58 ± 0.06b | 2.42 ± 0.18b | 0.009 |
| Hb, g/L | 142 ± 3b | 166 ± 7a | 144 ± 3b | 146 ± 3b | 143 ± 9b | 0.043 |
| PCV, % | 30.2 ± 1.0b | 35.9 ± 1.6a | 31.1 ± 0.6b | 30.3 ± 0.6b | 28.4 ± 2.4b | 0.020 |
| Week 6 | ||||||
| WBC, 109/L | 190 ± 3 | 201 ± 9 | 184 ± 3 | 187 ± 6 | 193 ± 4 | 0.102 |
| Lymphocyte, 109/L | 151 ± 3 | 161 ± 2 | 149 ± 2 | 152 ± 5 | 155 ± 4 | 0.153 |
| RBC, 1012/L | 2.87 ± 0.10 | 3.15 ± 0.08 | 2.82 ± 0.07 | 3.18 ± 0.17 | 2.87 ± 0.11 | 0.074 |
| Hb, g/L | 148 ± 6 | 163 ± 5 | 145 ± 4 | 160 ± 8 | 154 ± 6 | 0.208 |
| PCV, % | 33.0 ± 1.1 | 36.1 ± 1.6 | 31.9 ± 0.8 | 35.5 ± 1.7 | 33.4 ± 1.1 | 0.091 |
| Week 8 | ||||||
| WBC, 109/L | 182 ± 5 | 203 ± 4 | 200 ± 12 | 199 ± 4 | 194 ± 1 | 0.605 |
| Lymphocyte, 109/L | 145 ± 4b | 161 ± 4a | 154 ± 3a,b | 157 ± 3a,b | 148 ± 5b | 0.034 |
| RBC, 1012/L | 3.12 ± 0.17a | 3.12 ± 0.18a | 2.76 ± 0.10a,b | 3.08 ± 0.10a | 2.78 ± 0.13a,b | 0.022 |
| Hb, g/L | 147 ± 3 | 166 ± 5 | 150 ± 6 | 163 ± 5 | 150 ± 7 | 0.064 |
| PCV, % | 31.2 ± 2.4b | 36.8 ± 1.2a | 33.0 ± 1.2a,b | 36.7 ± 1.1a | 33.0 ± 1.5a,b | 0.034 |
Means with different superscript letters within the same line differ significantly, P < 0.05; data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 12).
Abbreviations: Hb, hemoglobin; PCV, pecked-cell volume; RBC, red blood cell; WBC, white blood cell.
Figure 1Effect of cyclic temperature treatment on T-cell populations of CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 12).
Effect of cyclic temperature treatment on the SIgA concentration (mg/mL).
| Item | T22C | T24C | T26C | T28C | T30C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BALF | 1,173 ± 58a,b | 1,168 ± 35a,b | 1,251 ± 39a | 1,062 ± 24b | 1,159 ± 54a,b | 0.025 |
| DLF | 1,334 ± 204 | 1,251 ± 238 | 1,728 ± 143 | 1,681 ± 211 | 1,494 ± 273 | 0.117 |
| JLF | 957 ± 137 | 1,045 ± 102 | 1,082 ± 128 | 1,085 ± 44 | 1,301 ± 142 | 0.454 |
| ILF | 1,669 ± 167 | 1,732 ± 159 | 1,843 ± 91 | 1,922 ± 70 | 1,635 ± 141 | 0.214 |
Means with different superscript letters within the same line differ significantly, P < 0.05; data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 12).
Abbreviations: BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; DLF, lavage fluids from duodenum; ILF, lavage fluids from ileum; JLF, lavage fluids from jejunum; SIgA, secretory immunoglobulin A.
Figure 2Effect of cyclic temperature treatment on the microbiota diversity in respiratory tract. (A) The lung microbiota analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA); (B) Venn diagram of the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in different treatments; (C) statistics of OTUs clustering and annotation of each sample; data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 4).
Figure 3Distribution of lung bacteria at phylum level. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 4). ∗P < 0.05.
Figure 4Effect of cyclic temperature treatment on the bacterial community structure in respiratory tract. (A) Distribution of lung bacteria at phylum level; (B) distribution of lung bacteria at genus level. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 4). ∗P < 0.05.
Figure 5Effect of cyclic temperature treatment on the cecum bacterial community structure at the phylum level. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 5). ∗∗P < 0.01.
Effect of cyclic temperature treatment on the cecum microbiota compositions at the phylum level.
| Taxonomy | T24C | T30C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteroidetes | 0.42 ± 0.02b | 0.55 ± 0.02a | 0.002 |
| Firmicutes | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 0.437 |
| Proteobacteria | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.008 | 0.616 |
| Verrucomicrobia | 0.03 ± 0.002 | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.776 |
| Euryarchaeota | 0.01 ± 0.003 | 0.001 ± 0.0002 | 0.057 |
| Fusobacteria | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.0004 ± 0.0001 | 0.112 |
Means with different superscript letters within the same line differ significantly, P < 0.05; data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 5).
Effect of cyclic temperature treatment on the cecum microbiota compositions at the order level.
| Taxonomy | T24C | T30C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteroidales | 0.42 ± 0.02b | 0.55 ± 0.02a | 0.002 |
| Clostridiales | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 0.423 |
| Fusobacteriales | 0.03 ± 0.006 | 0.0004 ± 0.0002 | 0.112 |
| Campylobacterales | 0.02 ± 0.004a | 0.007 ± 0.001b | 0.029 |
| Desulfovibrionales | 0.02 ± 0.002 | 0.03 ± 0.003 | 0.102 |
| Burkholderiales | 0.02 ± 0.003 | 0.013 ± 0.001 | 0.489 |
| Methanobacteriales | 0.01 ± 0.003 | 0.006 ± 0.002 | 0.065 |
| Aeromonadales | 0.01 ± 0.005 | 0.009 ± 0.001 | 0.688 |
Means with different superscript letters within the same line differ significantly, P < 0.05; data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 5).
Figure 6Effect of cyclic temperature treatment on the cecum bacterial community structure at the order level. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 5). ∗∗P < 0.01.
Effect of cyclic temperature treatment on the cecum microbiota compositions at the genus level.
| Taxonomy | T24C | T30C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.01 ± 0.005 | 0.009 ± 0.002 | 0.688 | |
| 0.01 ± 0.004 | 0.008 ± 0.002 | 0.688 | |
| 0.02 ± 0.002 | 0.03 ± 0.002 | 0.202 | |
| 0.02 ± 0.004 | 0.02 ± 0.004 | 0.677 | |
| 0.01 ± 0.002 | 0.007 ± 0.001 | 0.075 | |
| 0.04 ± 0.008 | 0.05 ± 0.001 | 0.500 | |
| 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.0061 ± 0.002 | 0.543 | |
| 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.0004 ± 0.0001 | 0.112 | |
| 0.02 ± 0.003 | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.473 | |
| 0.016 ± 0.002 | 0.02 ± 0.002 | 0.079 | |
| 0.0002 ± 0.00002 | 0.03 ± 0.008 | 0.070 |
Means with different superscript letters within the same line differ significantly, P < 0.05; data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 5).
Figure 7Effect of cyclic temperature treatment on the cecum bacterial community structure at the genus level. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 5).