| Literature DB >> 33248197 |
Marta Lavrador1, M Margarida Castel-Branco2, Ana C Cabral3, Manuel T Veríssimo4, Isabel V Figueiredo5, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos6.
Abstract
The use of anticholinergic drugs and other drugs with anticholinergic activity is highly prevalent in older people. Cumulative anticholinergic effects, known as anticholinergic burden, are associated with important peripheral and central adverse effects and outcomes. Several methods have been developed to quantify anticholinergic burden and to estimate the risk of adverse anticholinergic effects. Serum anticholinergic activity (SAA) and anticholinergic burden scoring systems are the most commonly used methods to predict the occurrence of important negative outcomes. These tools could guide clinicians in making more rational prescriptions to enhance patient safety, especially in older people. However, the literature has reported conflicting results about the predictive ability of these tools. The majority of these instruments ignore relevant pharmacologic aspects such as the doses used, differential muscarinic receptor subtype affinities, and blood-brain barrier permeability. To increase the clinical relevance of these tools, mechanistic and clinical pharmacology should collaborate. This narrative review describes the rational and pharmacological basis of anticholinergic burden tools and provides insight about their predictive value for adverse outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: Aged; Amitriptyline; Anticholinergic effects; Atropine; Cholinergic antagonists; Citalopram; Clozapine; Darifenacin; Diazepam; Digoxin; Furosemide; Oxybutynin; Reproducibility of results; Risk assessment; Trospium chloride
Year: 2020 PMID: 33248197 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmacol Res ISSN: 1043-6618 Impact factor: 7.658