| Literature DB >> 33247913 |
Bengt Herweg1,2, Allan Welter-Frost1,2, Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman3.
Abstract
In chronic systolic heart failure and conduction system disease, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is the only known non-pharmacologic heart failure therapy that improves cardiac function, functional capacity, and survival while decreasing cardiac workload and hospitalization rates. While conventional bi-ventricular pacing has been shown to benefit patients with heart failure and conduction system disease, there are limitations to its therapeutic success, resulting in widely variable clinical response. Limitations of conventional CRT evolve around myocardial scar, fibrosis, and inability to effectively simulate diseased tissue. Studies have shown endocardial stimulation in closer proximity to the specialized conduction system is more effective when compared with epicardial stimulation. Several observational and acute haemodynamic studies have demonstrated improved electrical resynchronization and echocardiographic response with conduction system pacing (CSP). Our objective is to provide a systematic review of the evolution of CRT, and an introduction to CSP as an intriguing, though experimental physiologic alternative to conventional CRT. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: Bi-ventricular pacing; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Conduction system pacing; Heart failure; His-bundle-pacing; Left-bundle-branch block; Left-bundle-branch pacing
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33247913 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Europace ISSN: 1099-5129 Impact factor: 5.214