Literature DB >> 33247391

Risk of Cancer in Association with Ranitidine and Nizatidine vs Other H2 Blockers: Analysis of the Japan Medical Data Center Claims Database 2005-2018.

Masao Iwagami1,2, Ryosuke Kumazawa3, Yoshihisa Miyamoto4, Yuri Ito5, Miho Ishimaru6, Kojiro Morita6, Shota Hamada7, Nanako Tamiya6, Hideo Yasunaga8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In September 2019, ranitidine and nizatidine were suggested to contain N-nitrosodimethylamine, a carcinogenic substance. People have since been concerned about the potential impact of ranitidine/nizatidine use on the risk of cancer.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the risk of cancer among people receiving ranitidine or nizatidine compared with other histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2 blockers) [cimetidine, famotidine, roxatidine, and lafutidine].
METHODS: In the Japan Medical Data Center claims database (comprising people aged < 75 years) from 2005 to 2018, we identified new adult users of H2 blockers and classified them into ranitidine/nizatidine users and other H2 blocker users. We estimated the incidence of cancer diagnosis in each group and conducted a multivariable Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: We identified 113,745 new users of ranitidine/nizatidine (median age 41.2 years [interquartile range 31.7-51.1]; 49.1% men; median follow-up 2.4 years [1.1-4.5]) and 503,982 new users of other H2 blockers (median age 40.9 years [31.1-51.2]; 51.0% men; median follow-up 2.3 years [0.9-4.2]). The incidence rate of cancer diagnosis was 6.39 (95% confidence interval 6.13-6.66) cases per 1000 person-years (top three sites: breast 14.8%; colorectal 14.6%; and stomach 11.5%) in the ranitidine/nizatidine group and 6.17 (6.05-6.30) cases per 1000 person-years (colorectal 14.7%; breast 13.5%; and stomach 11.2%) in the other H2 blockers group. The adjusted hazard ratio (ranitidine/nizatidine users vs other H2 blocker users) was 1.02 (0.98-1.07). The results were similar by follow-up length, by cancer site, and when ranitidine and nizatidine users were separately compared with the other H2 blockers group. By cumulative dose, the adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was 1.03 (0.98-1.08) from 1 to 180 defined daily doses (DDDs), 1.00 (0.73-1.39) from 181 to 365 DDDs, 0.95 (0.61-1.48) from 366 to 730 DDDs, and 0.83 (0.45-1.55) at > 730 DDDs.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that ranitidine/nizatidine is associated with an increased risk of cancer, although further studies with more accurate measurement of exposure, inclusion of older people, and longer follow-up may be needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33247391     DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-01024-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  17 in total

1.  Atypical Antipsychotics and the Risk of Hyperlipidemia: A Sequence Symmetry Analysis.

Authors:  Yoshinori Takeuchi; Kazuhiro Kajiyama; Chieko Ishiguro; Yoshiaki Uyama
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  The accuracy of Japanese claims data in identifying breast cancer cases.

Authors:  Izumi Sato; Hiroshi Yagata; Yasuo Ohashi
Journal:  Biol Pharm Bull       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.233

3.  Ranitidine: all products are out of stock as investigations continue.

Authors:  Elisabeth Mahase
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-11-28

4.  Ranitidine: doctors should switch patients to alternative, says health department.

Authors:  Elisabeth Mahase
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-10-17

5.  GSK recalls ranitidine products over potential carcinogen contamination.

Authors:  Elisabeth Mahase
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-10-08

6.  Immortal time bias in pharmacoepidemiological studies on cancer patient survival: empirical illustration for beta-blocker use in four cancers with different prognosis.

Authors:  Janick Weberpals; Lina Jansen; Myrthe P P van Herk-Sukel; Josephina G Kuiper; Mieke J Aarts; Pauline A J Vissers; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Pregabalin and injury: A nested case-control and case-crossover study.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Miyamoto; Masao Iwagami; Shotaro Aso; Hiroki Matsui; Kent Doi; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in Japanese administrative data.

Authors:  Hayato Yamana; Mutsuko Moriwaki; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Mariko Kodan; Kiyohide Fushimi; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.211

9.  Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors and Risk of Malignant Melanoma: Matched Cohort Study Using Primary Care Data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

Authors:  Anthony Matthews; Sinéad M Langan; Ian J Douglas; Liam Smeeth; Krishnan Bhaskaran
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Use of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) contaminated valsartan products and risk of cancer: Danish nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Anton Pottegård; Kasper Bruun Kristensen; Martin Thomsen Ernst; Nanna Borup Johansen; Pierre Quartarolo; Jesper Hallas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-09-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Pharmacoepidemiological Research on N-Nitrosodimethylamine-Contaminated Ranitidine Use and Long-Term Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chun-Hsiang Wang; I-I Chen; Chung-Hung Chen; Yuan-Tsung Tseng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Effect of Oral Ranitidine on Urinary Excretion of N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA): A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jeffry Florian; Murali K Matta; Ryan DePalma; Victoria Gershuny; Vikram Patel; Cheng-Hui Hsiao; Robbert Zusterzeel; Rodney Rouse; Kristin Prentice; Colleen Gosa Nalepinski; Insook Kim; Sojeong Yi; Liang Zhao; Miyoung Yoon; Susan Selaya; David Keire; Joyce Korvick; David G Strauss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 56.272

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.