Literature DB >> 33246921

Role of predictive markers for severe postoperative complications in gynecological cancer surgery: a prospective study (RISC-Gyn Trial).

Melisa Guelhan Inci1,2, Rolf Richter3, Hannah Woopen3, Julia Rasch3, Kathrin Heise4, Louise Anders3, Kristina Mueller3, Sara Nasser3, Timo Siepmann2,5, Jalid Sehouli3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgery for gynecological cancer involves highly invasive and complex procedures potentially associated with various complications, which can cause extended hospital stays and delay of subsequent therapy, with a detrimental effect on the prognosis. The aim of this study was to explore and define the predictors of severe postoperative complications in patients undergoing surgery for gynecologic cancer.
METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for gynecologic cancers were analyzed prospectively from October 2015 through January 2017. Using validated assessment tools preoperatively, we assessed comorbidities, performance status, quality of life, nutritional and body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis, and the surgical data of each patient. Surgical complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo criteria. Using stepwise logistic regression models, we identified predictive markers for postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Of the 226 enrolled patients, 40 (17.7%) experienced a grade ≥IIIb complication according to the Clavien-Dindo criteria. In the regression analysis, overweight/obesity (body mass index >25) (OR 6.41, 95% CI 2.38 to 17.24; p<0.001) and impaired physical functioning defined by a quality of life questionnaire (OR 4.19, 95% CI 1.84 to 9.50; p=0.001) emerged as significant predictors of postoperative complications. Moreover, postoperative complications were predicted by phase angle of bioelectrical impedance analysis <4.75° (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.35 to 7.16; p=0.008) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >1 (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.06 to 5.92; p=0.04). Intraoperative factors associated with higher risk of postoperative complications were increased use of norepinephrine (>11 µg/kg/min) (OR 5.59, 95% CI 2.16 to 14.44; p<0.001) and performance of large bowel resection (OR 4.28, 95% CI 1.67 to 10.97; p=0.002).
CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing surgery for gynecological cancer, preoperative evaluation of performance status according to ECOG, domains of quality of life and nutritional status, as well as intraoperative monitoring of risk factors, might help to identify patients at high risk for severe postoperative complications, and thus reduce surgical morbidity and mortality. © IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gynecologic surgical procedures; operative; ovarian cancer; postoperative complications; quality of life (PRO)/palliative care; surgical procedures

Year:  2020        PMID: 33246921     DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  3 in total

1.  Obesity and gynecological cancers: A toxic relationship.

Authors:  Ignacio A Wichmann; Mauricio A Cuello
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 4.447

2.  Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: What Is Different Compared to Healthy Women?

Authors:  Melisa Guelhan Inci; Rolf Richter; Kathrin Heise; Ricarda Dukatz; Hannah Woopen; Jalid Sehouli
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Impact of Obesity on Major Surgical Outcomes in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Benshuo Cai; Kang Li; Gang Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.