| Literature DB >> 33246887 |
Francesco Muntoni1, Enrico Bertini2, Giacomo Comi3, Janbernd Kirschner4, Anna Lusakowska5, Eugenio Mercuri6, Mariacristina Scoto7, W Ludo van der Pol8, Carole Vuillerot9, Alexander Burdeska10, Muna El-Khairi11, Paulo Fontoura12, Jane Ives11, Ksenija Gorni13, Carol Reid11, Sabine Fuerst-Recktenwald12.
Abstract
In a previous Phase 2 study, olesoxime had a favorable safety profile. Although the primary endpoint was not met, analyses suggested that olesoxime might help in the maintenance of motor function in patients with Types 2/3 SMA. This open-label extension study (OLEOS) further characterizes the safety, tolerability and efficacy of olesoxime over longer therapy durations. In OLEOS, no new safety risks were identified. Compared to matched natural history data, patients treated with olesoxime demonstrated small, non-significant changes in motor function over 52 weeks. Motor function scores were stable for 52 weeks but declined over the remainder of the study. The greatest decline in motor function was seen in patients ≤15 years old, and those with Type 2 SMA had faster motor function decline versus those with Type 3 SMA. Previous treatment with olesoxime in the Phase 2 study was not protective of motor function in OLEOS. Respiratory outcomes were stable in patients with Type 3 SMA >15 years old but declined in patients with Type 2 SMA and in patients with Type 3 SMA ≤15 years old. Overall, with no stabilization of functional measures observed over 130 weeks, OLEOS did not support significant benefit of olesoxime in patients with SMA.Entities:
Keywords: Longitudinal study; Motor function measure; Natural history data; Olesoxime; Spinal muscular atrophy
Year: 2020 PMID: 33246887 DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2020.10.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuromuscul Disord ISSN: 0960-8966 Impact factor: 4.296