| Literature DB >> 33246421 |
Jian Chen1, Xie-Xiang Shao1, Wen-Yuan Sui1, Jing-Fan Yang1, Yao-Long Deng1, Jing Xu1, Zi-Fang Huang2, Jun-Lin Yang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Difficult procedures of severe rigid spinal deformity increase the risk of intraoperative neurological injury. Here, we aimed to investigate the preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for postoperative neurological complications when treating severe rigid spinal deformity.Entities:
Keywords: Neurological complication; Osteotomy; Risk factor; Severe spinal deformity
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33246421 PMCID: PMC7697368 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-020-02012-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
The demographics, spinal cord function classification, and surgical parameters of patients
| Characteristic | Mean ± SEM |
|---|---|
| Age | 21.0 (8–56) |
| Sex(M/F) | 84/93 |
| Diagnosis | IS(78),CS(29),NM(32),NF(17), TB(9),revision(8), others(4) |
| Curve type | |
| Scoliosis | 25 |
| Kyphosis | 11 |
| Kyphoscoliosis | 141 |
| Spinal cord function classification | |
| Type A | 108 |
| Type B | 51 |
| Type C | 18 |
| Halo gravity traction | 55/177 |
| Osteotomy | |
| SPO | 39 |
| PSO | 29 |
| PDO | 43 |
| VCR | 53 |
| MVCR | 35 |
Yang’s Classification System of Severe Spinal Deformities
| Classification | Neurological Symptoms | MRI Findings | Evoked Potentials |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type A | – | – | – |
| Type B | – | -or+ | -or+ |
| Type C | + | -or+ | + |
MRI magnetic resonance imaging; No, neurological symptoms not present, no spinal cord malformations found on MRI, no positive change in evoked potentials; Yes, neurological symptoms present, spinal cord malformations found on MRI, positive change in evoked potentials
Fig. 1Data of spinal deformity correction and neurological complications incidence in all patients a The patient’s preoperative and postoperative scoliosis angle and kyphosis angle. b The incidence of evoked potential events and neurological complications
Data of Intraoperative Outcomes in NC group
| Case | Preoperative traction | Osteotomy grade | Blood loss (mL) | Operative time (min) | The stage of EP events | Postoperative Spinal Cord Function | Complication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yes | 2 | 1000 | 600 | Correction | Frankel grade C | Pulmonary infection |
| 2 | No | 3 | 2000 | 370 | Osteotomy | Frankel grade D | – |
| 3 | No | 4 | 1550 | 420 | Screw insertion and osteotomy | Frankel grade D | – |
| 4 | No | 4 | 8200 | 550 | Correction | Frankel grade A | – |
| 5 | Yes | 5 | 5900 | 1100 | Osteotomy and correction | Frankel grade C | – |
| 6 | Yes | 5 | 3600 | 445 | Osteotomy | Frankel grade D | – |
| 7 | No | 3 | 3200 | 510 | Osteotomy | Frankel grade D | Wound infection and urinary tract infection |
| 8 | Yes | 5 | 3700 | 600 | Correction | Frankel grade C | – |
| 9 | Yes | 5 | 5968 | 975 | Osteotomy and correction | Frankel grade B | – |
| 10 | No | 5 | 4999 | 665 | Correction | Frankel grade C | – |
| 11 | Yes | 5 | 4050 | 580 | Osteotomy and correction | Frankel grade C | – |
| 12 | Yes | 6 | 1200 | 420 | Osteotomy | Frankel grade D | Wound infection |
| 13 | Yes | 6 | 1200 | 390 | Osteotomy | Frankel grade D | Wound infection |
| 14 | Yes | 6 | 960 | 353 | Screw insertion and osteotomy | Frankel grade D | – |
| 15 | Yes | 6 | 2400 | 560 | Correction | Frankel grade D | Wound infection |
| 16 | No | 4 | 1100 | 440 | Osteotomy | Frankel grade C | Hemopneumothorax |
| 17 | Yes | 5 | 3800 | 590 | Osteotomy and correction | Frankel grade B | Hemorrhage |
| 18 | No | 6 | 2500 | 550 | Correction | Frankel grade D | – |
| 19 | Yes | 6 | 5779 | 590 | Osteotomy and correction | Frankel grade C | Cerebrospinal fluid leakage |
| 20 | Yes | 5 | 3300 | 615 | Correction | Frankel grade D | – |
| 21 | Yes | 6 | 4600 | 550 | Osteotomy | Frankel grade C | – |
| 22 | No | 6 | 1500 | 550 | Correction | Frankel grade D | – |
Related factors of neurogical complications between NC group and non-NC group
| Factors | NC group( | Non-NC group( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 24.6 ± 8.7 | 20.5 ± 8.2 | 0.032 |
| Sex(M/F) | 12/10 | 72/83 | 0.459 |
| Diagnosis | IS(7),CS(5),NM(6), TB(2),revision(2) | IS(71),CS(24),NM(26),NF(17), TB(7),revision(6),other(4) | 0.032 |
| Osteotomy | |||
| SPO | 1 | 38 | 0.001 |
| PSO | 2 | 27 | |
| PDO | 3 | 40 | |
| VCR | 8 | 45 | |
| MVCR | 8 | 27 | |
| Curve type | |||
| Scoliosis | 0 | 25 | 0.122 |
| Kyphosis | 2 | 9 | |
| Kyphoscoliosis | 20 | 121 | |
| Spinal cord function | |||
| Type A | 6 | 102 | < 0.001 |
| Type B | 7 | 44 | |
| Type C | 9 | 9 | |
| Angle of scoliosis (°) | 129.6 ± 26.2 | 114.9 ± 25.6 | 0.017 |
| Scoliosis correction rate (%) | 50.5% ± 18.8% | 55.4% ± 12.4% | 0.123 |
| Angle of kyphosis (°) | 130.8 ± 31.3 | 105.5 ± 33.2 | 0.001 |
| Kyphosis correction rate (%) | 49.8% ± 20.4% | 59.3% ± 14.3% | 0.008 |
| C-DAR | 19.3 ± 6.6 | 18.1 ± 5.5 | 0.344 |
| S-DAR | 23.2 ± 7.9 | 18.1 ± 8.1 | 0.007 |
| T-DAR | 40.8 ± 12.6 | 32.4 ± 13.2 | 0.006 |
| Flexibility (%) | 14.4 ± 11.5 | 15.6 ± 10.9 | 0.672 |
| Halo gravity traction | 14/22 | 41/113 | < 0.001 |
| Osteotomy site | |||
| HT | 2 | 6 | 0.037 |
| MT | 10 | 58 | |
| LT | 10 | 72 | |
| L | 0 | 19 | |
| Anterior strut graft | 7/22 | 27/155 | 0.115 |
| Shortening distance of osteotomy gap (cm) | 3.8 ± 0.8 | 3.5 ± 0.8 | 0.159 |
| Blood loss | 2605.7 ± 131.3 | 3295.7 ± 425.3 | 0.073 |
| Operative time | 472.1 ± 8.3 | 564.5 ± 37.8 | 0.001 |
The incidence of evoked potentials and neurological complication for different types of spinal cord function classification
| Classification | Incidence of EP events | Incidence of NC events |
|---|---|---|
| Type A | 26.90% | 5.60% |
| Type B | 39.20% | 13.70% |
| Type C | 50% | 50% |
| 0.078 | < 0.001 |