Literature DB >> 33246190

Evaluation of a cycle-generative adversarial network-based cone-beam CT to synthetic CT conversion algorithm for adaptive radiation therapy.

Miriam Eckl1, Lea Hoppen2, Gustavo R Sarria3, Judit Boda-Heggemann1, Anna Simeonova-Chergou1, Volker Steil1, Frank A Giordano3, Jens Fleckenstein1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Image-guided radiation therapy could benefit from implementing adaptive radiation therapy (ART) techniques. A cycle-generative adversarial network (cycle-GAN)-based cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-to-synthetic CT (sCT) conversion algorithm was evaluated regarding image quality, image segmentation and dosimetric accuracy for head and neck (H&N), thoracic and pelvic body regions.
METHODS: Using a cycle-GAN, three body site-specific models were priorly trained with independent paired CT and CBCT datasets of a kV imaging system (XVI, Elekta). sCT were generated based on first-fraction CBCT for 15 patients of each body region. Mean errors (ME) and mean absolute errors (MAE) were analyzed for the sCT. On the sCT, manually delineated structures were compared to deformed structures from the planning CT (pCT) and evaluated with standard segmentation metrics. Treatment plans were recalculated on sCT. A comparison of clinically relevant dose-volume parameters (D98, D50 and D2 of the target volume) and 3D-gamma (3%/3mm) analysis were performed.
RESULTS: The mean ME and MAE were 1.4, 29.6, 5.4 Hounsfield units (HU) and 77.2, 94.2, 41.8 HU for H&N, thoracic and pelvic region, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients varied between 66.7 ± 8.3% (seminal vesicles) and 94.9 ± 2.0% (lungs). Maximum mean surface distances were 6.3 mm (heart), followed by 3.5 mm (brainstem). The mean dosimetric differences of the target volumes did not exceed 1.7%. Mean 3D gamma pass rates greater than 97.8% were achieved in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The presented method generates sCT images with a quality close to pCT and yielded clinically acceptable dosimetric deviations. Thus, an important prerequisite towards clinical implementation of CBCT-based ART is fulfilled.
Copyright © 2020 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive radiation therapy; Cone-beam CT; Cycle-generative adversarial network-based image correction; Synthetic CT

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33246190     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  6 in total

1.  Geometric and Dosimetric Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based Automatic Delineation on CBCT-Synthesized CT and Planning CT for Breast Cancer Adaptive Radiotherapy: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Zhenhui Dai; Yiwen Zhang; Lin Zhu; Junwen Tan; Geng Yang; Bailin Zhang; Chunya Cai; Huaizhi Jin; Haoyu Meng; Xiang Tan; Wanwei Jian; Wei Yang; Xuetao Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  A cycle generative adversarial network for improving the quality of four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images.

Authors:  Keisuke Usui; Koichi Ogawa; Masami Goto; Yasuaki Sakano; Shinsuke Kyougoku; Hiroyuki Daida
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Head CT Image Segmentation and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Technology Based on Human Anatomy.

Authors:  Zhenyu Wu; Lin Wang; Yifei Li; Shuhui Dai; Dongliang Zhang
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 4.  Deep learning methods for enhancing cone-beam CT image quality toward adaptive radiation therapy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Branimir Rusanov; Ghulam Mubashar Hassan; Mark Reynolds; Mahsheed Sabet; Jake Kendrick; Pejman Rowshanfarzad; Martin Ebert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.506

5.  Clinical suitability of deep learning based synthetic CTs for adaptive proton therapy of lung cancer.

Authors:  Adrian Thummerer; Carmen Seller Oria; Paolo Zaffino; Arturs Meijers; Gabriel Guterres Marmitt; Robin Wijsman; Joao Seco; Johannes Albertus Langendijk; Antje-Christin Knopf; Maria Francesca Spadea; Stefan Both
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.506

6.  Dosimetric benefits of daily treatment plan adaptation for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors:  Miriam Eckl; Gustavo R Sarria; Sandra Springer; Marvin Willam; Arne M Ruder; Volker Steil; Michael Ehmann; Frederik Wenz; Jens Fleckenstein
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.481

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.