Literature DB >> 33246035

Sex and age differences in symptoms and signs of dry eye disease in a Norwegian cohort of patients.

Sara Tellefsen Nøland1, Reza A Badian2, Tor P Utheim3, Øygunn A Utheim4, Aleksandar Stojanovic5, Behzod Tashbayev6, Sten Raeder7, Darlene A Dartt8, Xiangjun Chen9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate sex and age differences in symptoms and signs in a Norwegian clinic-based cohort of patients with dry eye disease (DED).
METHODS: Visitors at the Norwegian Dry Eye Clinic were examined using Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire score, tear osmolarity, tear break-up time (TFBUT), ocular surface staining, corneal sensitivity, Schirmer I test, and meibum expressibility (ME) and quality (MQ). A diagnosis of DED was made by an ophthalmologist based on symptoms and signs, and only DED patients were enrolled in the study: 1823 patients (338 males; mean age 51.2 ± 16.2 years; 1485 females; mean age 52.5 ± 16.0 years). The patients were divided into age subgroups: 20-39 years, 40-59 years and ≥60 years. Sex differences in the aforementioned tests were analyzed. Values were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and intergroup comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U test. Multiple regression was used to analyze sex and age influences on symptoms and signs.
RESULTS: When patients of all ages were analyzed, females had increased osmolarity, shorter TFBUT, reduced MQ and ME and higher corneal sensitivity. OSDI, Schirmer I test, ocular surface staining and corneal staining were not significantly different between the sexes. Only with TFBUT and ME were the sex difference present in all age subgroups. Multiple regression showed that all parameters were influenced by either sex or age, but only TFBUT and ME were influenced by both sex and age. (all p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Sex and age differences in dry eye were most consistent in TFBUT and ME, that indicate differences in meibomian gland functionality. Sex and age subgroup stratification is important in future studies investigating DED in other populations.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Dry eye disease; Ocular surface; Sex differences; Tear film

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33246035     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2020.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ocul Surf        ISSN: 1542-0124            Impact factor:   5.033


  4 in total

1.  Utilizing Baidu Index to Investigate Seasonality, Spatial Distribution and Public Attention of Dry Eye Diseases in Chinese Mainland.

Authors:  Haozhe Yu; Weizhen Zeng; Mengyao Zhang; Gezheng Zhao; Wenyu Wu; Yun Feng
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-06

2.  Economic burden and loss of quality of life from dry eye disease in Canada.

Authors:  Clara Chan; Setareh Ziai; Varun Myageri; James G Burns; C Lisa Prokopich
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-15

3.  The Eyelid Meibomian Gland Deficiency in Fucosyltransferase 1 Knockout Mice.

Authors:  Chang Ho Yoon; Jin Suk Ryu; Jung Hwa Ko; Yeon Kyung Kim; Jang-Hee Oh; Jin Ho Chung; Joo Youn Oh
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-21       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Sex-based differences in conjunctival goblet cell responses to pro-inflammatory and pro-resolving mediators.

Authors:  Menglu Yang; Haakon K Fjærvoll; Ketil A Fjærvoll; Nicholas H Wang; Tor P Utheim; Charles N Serhan; Darlene A Dartt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.