Emily C L Wong1, Elisa Buffone2, So Jeong Lee1, Parambir S Dulai3, John K Marshall1, Walter Reinisch4, Neeraj Narula1. 1. Department of Medicine [Division of Gastroenterology] and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada. 2. Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 3. Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 4. Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is unclear whether early symptom improvement in Crohn's disease [CD] provides any prognostic information for patients long-term. This paper aims to investigate the relationship between early patient-reported outcomes [PROs] after completion of induction of infliximab, and their relationship with long-term clinical remission [CR] and endoscopic remission [ER]. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis [Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02096861] used data from 220 CD patients to evaluate the relationship of Weeks 6 and 14 PRO variables and Week 54 clinical remission (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI <150), PRO2 remission (mean score abdominal pain [AP] ≤1 and stool frequency [SF] ≤1.5), and endoscopic remission (Simple Endoscopic Score-CD [SES-CD <3). Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for confounders were used to assess the relationships between post-induction PROs and outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Patients with moderate or severe AP after induction had reduced odds of achieving 1-year CR and PRO2 remission compared with those with mild AP (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for CR 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.57, p = 0.0002). Similarly, patients with moderately to severely elevated SF after induction had reduced odds of 1-year CR and PRO2 remission compared with patients with less SF [aOR for CR 0.31, 95% CI 0.16-0.58, p = 0.0003]. No significant differences were found when comparing higher Weeks 6 or 14 PRO scores of AP and/or SF with lower PRO scores in the odds of achieving 1-year ER. CONCLUSIONS: Post-induction PROs of AP and SF strongly predict likelihood of 1-year CR but are not associated with 1-year ER. Clinical symptoms alone should not be relied upon when assessing response to therapies for CD.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is unclear whether early symptom improvement in Crohn's disease [CD] provides any prognostic information for patients long-term. This paper aims to investigate the relationship between early patient-reported outcomes [PROs] after completion of induction of infliximab, and their relationship with long-term clinical remission [CR] and endoscopic remission [ER]. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis [Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02096861] used data from 220 CD patients to evaluate the relationship of Weeks 6 and 14 PRO variables and Week 54 clinical remission (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI <150), PRO2 remission (mean score abdominal pain [AP] ≤1 and stool frequency [SF] ≤1.5), and endoscopic remission (Simple Endoscopic Score-CD [SES-CD <3). Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for confounders were used to assess the relationships between post-induction PROs and outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Patients with moderate or severe AP after induction had reduced odds of achieving 1-year CR and PRO2 remission compared with those with mild AP (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for CR 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.57, p = 0.0002). Similarly, patients with moderately to severely elevated SF after induction had reduced odds of 1-year CR and PRO2 remission compared with patients with less SF [aOR for CR 0.31, 95% CI 0.16-0.58, p = 0.0003]. No significant differences were found when comparing higher Weeks 6 or 14 PRO scores of AP and/or SF with lower PRO scores in the odds of achieving 1-year ER. CONCLUSIONS: Post-induction PROs of AP and SF strongly predict likelihood of 1-year CR but are not associated with 1-year ER. Clinical symptoms alone should not be relied upon when assessing response to therapies for CD.
Authors: Jennifer Jones; Edward V Loftus; Remo Panaccione; Li-Sheng Chen; Sandra Peterson; Joseph McConnell; Linnea Baudhuin; Karen Hanson; Brian G Feagan; Scott W Harmsen; Alan R Zinsmeister; Emelie Helou; William J Sandborn Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2008-09-17 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: R Khanna; G Zou; G D'Haens; B G Feagan; W J Sandborn; M K Vandervoort; R L Rolleri; E Bortey; C Paterson; W P Forbes; B G Levesque Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2014-10-27 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Neeraj Narula; Emily C L Wong; Parambir S Dulai; John K Marshall; Jean-Frederic Colombel; Walter Reinisch Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 9.071
Authors: William J Sandborn; Brian G Feagan; Paul Rutgeerts; Stephen Hanauer; Jean-Frédéric Colombel; Bruce E Sands; Milan Lukas; Richard N Fedorak; Scott Lee; Brian Bressler; Irving Fox; Maria Rosario; Serap Sankoh; Jing Xu; Kristin Stephens; Catherine Milch; Asit Parikh Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alain M Schoepfer; Christoph Beglinger; Alex Straumann; Michael Trummler; Stephan R Vavricka; Lukas E Bruegger; Frank Seibold Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Brian G Feagan; William J Sandborn; Christopher Gasink; Douglas Jacobstein; Yinghua Lang; Joshua R Friedman; Marion A Blank; Jewel Johanns; Long-Long Gao; Ye Miao; Omoniyi J Adedokun; Bruce E Sands; Stephen B Hanauer; Severine Vermeire; Stephan Targan; Subrata Ghosh; Willem J de Villiers; Jean-Frédéric Colombel; Zsolt Tulassay; Ursula Seidler; Bruce A Salzberg; Pierre Desreumaux; Scott D Lee; Edward V Loftus; Levinus A Dieleman; Seymour Katz; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245