Literature DB >> 3324574

Q fever vaccines for animals.

N Schmeer1, P Müller, J Langel, H Krauss, J W Frost, J Wieda.   

Abstract

The results of different workgroups and those obtained in own investigations with Q fever vaccines for cattle and sheep are reviewed and discussed. In field trials Coxiella (C.) burnetii vaccines of inactivated whole cells (WC) in phase (ph) I as well as WC ph II vaccines prevented infections of cows exposed to naturally infected environments, provided they were vaccinated as noninfected calves. To monitor calves for this purpose the sensitive ELISA has superseded the complement fixation test (CF). WC ph I vaccines failed to prevent shedding by uninfected cattle and sheep which were vaccinated and subsequently challenged by parenteral inoculation with viable organisms, but reduced shedding, and prevented pathological lesions and clinical symptoms. The results obtained in field trials with a commercially available vaccine consisting of killed WC ph II of C. burnetii and inactivated WC of Chlamydia psittaci indicated that vaccination had significantly improved fertility in vaccinated herds. However, the mechanism of protection is unclear because the function of the chlamydial component in this vaccine is not yet defined. Cattle given this vaccine can be distinguished from naturally infected cattle because the former produce predominantly non-complement-binding IgG2, detectable by ELISA. This vaccine frequently causes undesirable local reactions. Antigens of C. burnetii (strain "Frankfurt", ph II) prepared by propagation in cell cultures and successive purification by guanidinium hydrochloride- and chloroform/methanol-extraction (CMR), as well as a major protein extracted from these CMR preparations represent potential vaccine candidates without such side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3324574     DOI: 10.1016/s0176-6724(87)80191-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A        ISSN: 0176-6724


  8 in total

1.  Clinical aspects and prevention of Q fever in animals.

Authors:  H Krauss
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent fluorescence assay and high-pressure liquid chromatography for analysis of humoral immune responses to Coxiella burnetti proteins.

Authors:  N Schmeer; H P Müller; W Baumgärtner; J Wieda; H Krauss
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Serological response in sheep vaccinated against Coxiella burnetii (Q fever).

Authors:  G H Lang; J F Prescott; J C Williams
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 4.  Q fever.

Authors:  M Maurin; D Raoult
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Control of rickettsial diseases.

Authors:  J Kazár; R Brezina
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Bayesian Validation of the Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Its Superiority to the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and the Complement Fixation Test for Detecting Antibodies against Coxiella burnetii in Goat Serum.

Authors:  Michael Muleme; John Stenos; Gemma Vincent; Angus Campbell; Stephen Graves; Simone Warner; Joanne M Devlin; Chelsea Nguyen; Mark A Stevenson; Colin R Wilks; Simon M Firestone
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2016-06-06

Review 7.  Clinical aspects and prevention of Q fever in animals.

Authors:  I D Aitken
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Q Fever: current state of knowledge and perspectives of research of a neglected zoonosis.

Authors:  Sarah Rebecca Porter; Guy Czaplicki; Jacques Mainil; Raphaël Guattéo; Claude Saegerman
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.