INTRODUCTION: High-risk human papillomavirus infection impacts staging and prognosis of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs). Determination of HPV status in tumor tissue by p16-immunohistochemistry (p16-IHC) can be challenging; therefore, complementary methodologies could be useful in a clinical setting. OBJECTIVE: To test for accuracy and clinical relevance of HPV-DNA detection in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty OPSCCs were tested for p16-IHC status followed by HPV-16/18 DNA detection/quantification in FFPE-recovered DNA using ddPCR. Accuracy for HPV status determination and association with patient information were also evaluated. RESULTS: 32.0% (16/50) of the cases were p16-IHC positive (p16 +), 42.0% (21/50) had detectable levels of HPV-16 DNA, and none were positive for HPV-18 DNA. A higher median viral load of HPV-16 DNA was observed in p16 + cases (p < 0.0001). Concordance between p16-IHC and HPV-16 DNA ranged from 78.0 to 86.0% and accuracy rates were between 78.0 and 86.0%. P16-IHC and HPV-16 DNA detection was associated with gender, smoking status, and tumor subsite, while only HPV-16 DNA was associated with cT stage. The combination of HPV positivity by p16-IHC and ddPCR showed higher overall survival rates in comparison with p16 + /HPV-DNA- and p16 - /HPV-DNA- results. CONCLUSIONS: Type-specific HPV-DNA detection by ddPCR is highly specific but moderately sensitive for the determination of HPV status and showed clinical relevance, mainly when associated with p16-IHC status. Results highlight the importance of performing HPV-DNA testing in combination with p16-IHC for proper identification of HPV-associated OPSCC and to improve clinical management of OPSCC patients.
INTRODUCTION: High-risk human papillomavirus infection impacts staging and prognosis of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs). Determination of HPV status in tumor tissue by p16-immunohistochemistry (p16-IHC) can be challenging; therefore, complementary methodologies could be useful in a clinical setting. OBJECTIVE: To test for accuracy and clinical relevance of HPV-DNA detection in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty OPSCCs were tested for p16-IHC status followed by HPV-16/18 DNA detection/quantification in FFPE-recovered DNA using ddPCR. Accuracy for HPV status determination and association with patient information were also evaluated. RESULTS: 32.0% (16/50) of the cases were p16-IHC positive (p16 +), 42.0% (21/50) had detectable levels of HPV-16 DNA, and none were positive for HPV-18 DNA. A higher median viral load of HPV-16 DNA was observed in p16 + cases (p < 0.0001). Concordance between p16-IHC and HPV-16 DNA ranged from 78.0 to 86.0% and accuracy rates were between 78.0 and 86.0%. P16-IHC and HPV-16 DNA detection was associated with gender, smoking status, and tumor subsite, while only HPV-16 DNA was associated with cT stage. The combination of HPV positivity by p16-IHC and ddPCR showed higher overall survival rates in comparison with p16 + /HPV-DNA- and p16 - /HPV-DNA- results. CONCLUSIONS: Type-specific HPV-DNA detection by ddPCR is highly specific but moderately sensitive for the determination of HPV status and showed clinical relevance, mainly when associated with p16-IHC status. Results highlight the importance of performing HPV-DNA testing in combination with p16-IHC for proper identification of HPV-associated OPSCC and to improve clinical management of OPSCC patients.
Authors: Andrew P Stein; Sandeep Saha; Jennifer L Kraninger; Adam D Swick; Menggang Yu; Paul F Lambert; Randall J Kimple Journal: Cancer J Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.360
Authors: Kevin D Shield; Jacques Ferlay; Ahmedin Jemal; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; Anil K Chaturvedi; Freddie Bray; Isabelle Soerjomataram Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Gypsyamber D'Souza; Aimee R Kreimer; Raphael Viscidi; Michael Pawlita; Carole Fakhry; Wayne M Koch; William H Westra; Maura L Gillison Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-05-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Anil K Chaturvedi; William F Anderson; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Maria Paula Curado; Jacques Ferlay; Silvia Franceschi; Philip S Rosenberg; Freddie Bray; Maura L Gillison Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: José Guilherme Datorre; Ana Carolina de Carvalho; Mariana Bisarro Dos Reis; Monise Dos Reis; Marcus Matsushita; Florinda Santos; Denise Peixoto Guimarães; Rui Manuel Reis Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-01-05