| Literature DB >> 33244761 |
Mylyne Tham1, Josa M Frischer2, Stephen D Weigand3, Patrick D Fitz-Gibbon3, Samuel M Webb4, Yong Guo5, Reginald C Adiele1, Christopher A Robinson6, Wolfgang Brück7, Hans Lassmann8, Kendra L Furber1, M Jake Pushie9, Joseph E Parisi10, Claudia F Lucchinetti5, Bogdan F Popescu1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a heterogeneous inflammatory demyelinating disease. Iron distribution is altered in MS patients' brains, suggesting iron liberation within active lesions amplifies demyelination and neurodegeneration. Whether the amount and distribution of iron are similar or different among different MS immunopatterns is currently unknown.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33244761 PMCID: PMC7986227 DOI: 10.1002/ana.25974
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Neurol ISSN: 0364-5134 Impact factor: 10.422
Acute Case Reference Table
| Case # | IP Class | Autopsy or Biopsy | Gender | Age, yr | Disease Duration, mo | ROIs, n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | B | F | 9 | NA | 2 |
| 2 | 2 | B | F | 37 | 156 | 3 |
| 3 | 2 | A | M | 46 | 9 | 2 |
| 4 | 2 | A | F | 50 | 96 | 4 |
| 5 | 2 | B | F | 68 | 1 | 2 |
| 6 | 2 | B | M | 69 | 1.8 | 1 |
| 7 | 2 | A | M | 71 | 144 | 5 |
| 8 | 2 | B | M | 72 | 0.1 | 6 |
| 9 | 3 | A | F | 17 | 0.5 | 4 |
| 10 | 3 | A | M | 28 | 0.8 | 4 |
| 11 | 3 | A | F | 28 | 2 | 5 |
| 12 | 3 | B | M | 33 | NA | 2 |
| 13 | 3 | A | F | 34 | 13 | 4 |
| 14 | 3 | A | M | 35 | 1.5 | 4 |
| 15 | 3 | B | M | 37 | 1.8 | 1 |
| 16 | 3 | B | M | 38 | 0.3 | 1 |
| 17 | 3 | A | F | 40 | 120 | 5 |
| 18 | 3 | A | F | 45 | 0.2 | 3 |
| 19 | 3 | A | M | 45 | 0.6 | 5 |
| 20 | 3 | A | M | 58 | 3 | 1 |
| 21 | 3 | A | M | 78 | 2 | 4 |
A = autopsy; B = biopsy; F = female; IP = immunopattern; M = male; NA = not available; ROI = region of interest.
FIGURE 1Iron in early active (EA) multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions: (A–F) Immunopattern (IP) II MS (Case 7 in Table 1 and Fig 3A; first block). (G–L) IP III MS (Case 9 in Table 1 and Fig 3A). (A) Iron is increased in IP II EA lesions (X‐ray fluorescence imaging [XFI]). (B) The circumscribed loss of proteolipid protein (PLP) immunoreactivity highlights demyelination; the various regions of interest are outlined and named (EA = early active lesion; LA = late active lesion; NAWM = normal‐appearing white matter; PPWM = periplaque white matter) on this map (PLP); inset shows the presence of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) immunoreactive myelin debris within macrophages (MOG). (C) The lack of Luxol fast blue (Lfb) staining indicates demyelination; the areas imaged with microfocused XFI (see Fig 4A, B, E, F) are indicated (rectangles) on this map (Lfb/hematoxylin and eosin [HE]). (D) Loss of myelin‐associated glycoprotein (MAG) is equal to loss of PLP (compare with B; MAG). (E) The lesion is infiltrated by activated macrophages (higher magnification shown in lower left panel); activated microglia are present in the PPWM (higher magnification shown in lower right panel; KiM1P). (F) Complement deposition is present within the lesion, on myelin (lower left panel) and within macrophages (lower right panel; C9neo). (G) Iron is decreased in IP III EA lesions (XFI). (H) PLP immunoreactivity is still present in the EA lesion; the various regions of interest are outlined and named on this map (PLP); inset shows the presence of MOG immunoreactive myelin debris within macrophages (MOG). (I) Lfb staining is lost in the EA lesion; the areas imaged with microfocused XFI (see Fig 4C, D, G, H) are indicated (rectangles) on this map (Lfb/HE). (J) There is preferential loss of myelin‐associated glycoprotein (MAG; compare with H; MAG). (K) The lesion is infiltrated by activated macrophages (higher magnification shown in lower left panel); activated microglia are present in the PPWM (higher magnification shown in lower right panel; KiM1P). (L) Complement deposition is not present in lesion (C9neo). Color scales (A, G) represent the normalized total Kα fluorescence counts, proportional to total metal present, from blue (lowest) to red (highest). Scale bars = 3mm. Inset scale bars = 25μm (B, H, F), 75μm (E, K).
FIGURE 3Early active (EA) immunopattern (IP) II lesions contain significantly more iron than EA IP III lesions. (A) Distribution of iron concentrations for each of the 26 blocks in the study. Each point represents one region of interest (ROI) on a particular block. The value displayed for each ROI is the median concentration over the entire ROI shown on a log‐transformed scale. The subject age (years) and disease duration (Dur.; months) are provided on the y‐axis, noting that 4 subjects have multiple blocks. (B) Age‐adjusted iron concentration on the log scale by IP in EA lesions. The data are shown as the iron concentration found in the ROI minus the contribution attributed to age relative to the median age of 40 years. A broken x‐axis is used to include the highest value of 1.9. In sensitivity analyses that omitted this individual age‐adjusted iron remained higher in pattern II versus pattern III (p = 0.01). (C) Distribution of the EA/periplaque white matter (PPWM) iron ratio by IP classification (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank sum/Mann–Whitney U test). Each point in the figure represents the within‐subject ratio of EA iron to PPWM iron. Note the break in the x‐axis. (D) Distribution of macrophage densities in IP II versus IP III. We do not find a statistically significant difference in the distribution of macrophage densities between IP II and IP III (p = 0.11). (E) Relationship of iron concentration (y‐axis) to macrophage density (x‐axis). The colored dots represent IP II (purple) and IP III (green). We do not find a significant association between iron concentration and macrophage density overall (p = 0.74), within IP II (p = 0.88), nor within IP III (p = 0.30). LA = late active; WM = white matter.
FIGURE 4Microfocused X‐ray fluorescence imaging of early active lesions. (A) Ferric iron (Fe3+) in immunopattern (IP) II early active lesions is increased and localized within macrophages. (B) Ferrous iron (Fe2+) in IP II early active lesions is unremarkable. (C) Ferric iron in IP III early active lesions is decreased. (D) Ferrous iron in IP III early active lesions is unremarkable. (E) There is less ferric iron in the periplaque white matter (PPWM) than in lesions of IP II patients. (F) Ferrous iron in IP II PPWM is unremarkable. (G) There is more ferric iron in the PPWM than in lesions of IP III patients. (H) Ferrous iron in IP III PPWM is unremarkable. Color scales (A–H) represent the normalized total Kα fluorescence counts, proportional to total metal present, from blue (lowest) to red (highest). Scale bar = 100μm.
FIGURE 2Iron in early active (EA) multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions. (A–C) Immunopattern (IP) II MS (Case 4 in Table 1 and Fig 3A); (D–F) IP III MS (Case 11 in Table 1 and Fig 3A; second block). (A) Iron is increased in IP II EA lesions (X‐ray fluorescence imaging [XFI]). (B) The lack of proteolipid protein (PLP) immunoreactivity indicates demyelination; the various regions of interest are outlined and named (EA = early active lesion; LA = late active lesion; PPWM = periplaque white matter) on this map (PLP). (C) The lack of Luxol fast blue (Lfb) staining indicates demyelination (Lfb/hematoxylin and eosin [HE]). (D) Complement deposition is present in the EA lesion (C9neo). (E) Iron is decreased in IP III EA lesions (XFI). (F) PLP immunoreactivity is still present in the EA lesions; the various regions of interest are outlined and named on this map (PLP). (G) The lack of Lfb staining indicates demyelination (Lfb/HE). (H) There is preferential loss of myelin‐associated glycoprotein (MAG; compare with F; MAG). Color scales (A, E) represent the normalized total Kα fluorescence counts, proportional to total metal present, from blue (lowest) to red (highest). Scale bar = 3mm.
Summary of Patient Clinical Characteristics
| Characteristic | IP II | IP III | All Cases |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects, n | 8 | 13 | 21 |
| Gender, n (%) | |||
| F | 4 (50%) | 5 (38%) | 9 (43%) |
| M | 4 (50%) | 8 (62%) | 12 (57%) |
| Age, yr | |||
| Median | 59 | 37 | 40 |
| Q1, Q3 | 44, 70 | 33, 45 | 34, 58 |
| Range | 9–72 | 17–78 | 9–78 |
| Disease duration, mo | |||
| Median | 9 | 2 | 2 |
| Q1, Q3 | 1, 120 | 1, 2 | 1, 11 |
| Range | 0–156 | 0–120 | 0–156 |
| Missing | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Clinical course, n (%) | |||
| Uncertain/unavailable | 2 (25%) | 3 (23%) | 5 (24%) |
| RRMS | 2 (25%) | 2 (15%) | 4 (19%) |
| SPMS with attacks | 3 (38%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (14%) |
| Monophasic to death within 1 year | 0 (0%) | 8 (62%) | 8 (38%) |
| Isolated demyelinating syndrome | 1 (12%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (5%) |
| Regions of interest per patient | |||
| Median | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Q1, Q3 | 2, 4 | 2, 5 | 2, 5 |
| Range | 1–6 | 1–5 | 1–6 |
F = female; IP = immunopattern; M = male; MS = multiple sclerosis; RRMS = relapsing–remitting MS; SPMS = secondary progressive MS.
Comparing IP II and IP III on Iron by Early Active, Late Active, and PPWM
| Tissue | IP II | IP III | Difference |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early active | 0.004 | |||
| Age 20 yr | 0.17 (0.12–0.25) | 0.11 (0.08–0.13) | 64% (17 to 127%) | |
| Age 40 yr | 0.21 (0.16–0.27) | 0.13 (0.11–0.15) | 64% (17 to 127%) | |
| Age 60 yr | 0.25 (0.19–0.32) | 0.15 (0.12–0.19) | 64% (17 to 127%) | |
| Late active | 0.40 | |||
| Age 20 yr | 0.14 (0.08–0.23) | 0.11 (0.07–0.16) | 29% (−29 to 130%) | |
| Age 40 yr | 0.16 (0.10–0.26) | 0.13 (0.09–0.18) | 29% (−29 to 130%) | |
| Age 60 yr | 0.19 (0.12–0.31) | 0.15 (0.10–0.23) | 29% (−29 to 130%) | |
| PPWM | 0.54 | |||
| Age 20 yr | 0.13 (0.09–0.19) | 0.15 (0.12–0.19) | −10% (−36 to 25%) | |
| Age 40 yr | 0.16 (0.12–0.21) | 0.18 (0.14–0.22) | −10% (−36 to 25%) | |
| Age 60 yr | 0.19 (0.15–0.24) | 0.21 (0.16–0.28) | −10% (−36 to 25%) |
Values shown are groupwise geometric means expressed in μg/cm2 with 95% confidence intervals, differences for IP II compared to IP III on a percentage scale with 95% confidence intervals, and p value for the difference. Mean iron levels depend on age, but the difference does not.
IP = immunopattern; PPWM = periplaque white matter.