Literature DB >> 33244707

Virtual anthropology? Reliability of three-dimensional photogrammetry as a forensic anthropology measurement and documentation technique.

Rita Omari1, Cahill Hunt1, John Coumbaros1,2, Brendan Chapman3.   

Abstract

Osseous remains provide forensic anthropologists with morphological and osteometric information that can be used in building a biological profile. By conducting a visual and physical examination, an anthropologist can infer information such as the sex and age of the deceased. Traditionally, morphological and osteometric information is gathered by physically handling remains for analysis. With the advancement of digital technology, there has been a shift from direct to indirect methods of analysis by utilizing models generated from three-dimensional (3D) imaging, which includes computed tomography (CT) scanning and 3D photogrammetry. Although CT scanning is more common, photogrammetry has found application in a range of fields such as architecture, geography and road accident reconstruction. The application of modern-day photogrammetry for forensic anthropology purposes, however, has not been discussed extensively. The aim of this research was to validate the accuracy of 3D models generated by photogrammetry by comparing them to both 3D models generated by CT scanning and the actual physical models. In this study, six 3D models were created using photogrammetry (n = 3) and CT scanning (n = 3). The 3D models were generated from three different Bone Clone® human skulls. A mobile phone camera was used to capture images, which were then processed in Agisoft Metashape®. Intrarater, interrater, and intermethod reliability tests gave correlation coefficients of at least 0.9980, 0.9871, and 0.9862, respectively; rTEM results ranged from 0.250 to 6.55%; and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) yielded P values under 0.05 for all measurements except one. Statistical tests therefore showed photogrammetry to be a reliable and accurate alternative to more expensive CT scanning approaches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D reconstruction; Anthropometry; CT scan; Forensic anthropology; Photogrammetry; Skull

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33244707     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-020-02473-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  23 in total

1.  Analysis of patterned injuries and injury-causing instruments with forensic 3D/CAD supported photogrammetry (FPHG): an instruction manual for the documentation process.

Authors:  W Brüschweiler; M Braun; R Dirnhofer; M J Thali
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems.

Authors:  Zacharias Fourie; Janalt Damstra; Peter O Gerrits; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Digital forensic osteology--possibilities in cooperation with the Virtopsy project.

Authors:  Marcel A Verhoff; Frank Ramsthaler; Jonathan Krähahn; Ulf Deml; Ralf J Gille; Silke Grabherr; Michael J Thali; Kerstin Kreutz
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Using virtual reality for forensic examinations of injuries.

Authors:  Stephanie Koller; Lars C Ebert; Rosa Maria Martinez; Till Sieberth
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Forensic 3D documentation of skin injuries.

Authors:  Chiara Villa
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Photogrammetry using visible, infrared, hyperspectral and thermal imaging of crime scenes.

Authors:  G J Edelman; M C Aalders
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images.

Authors:  Julielynn Y Wong; Albert K Oh; Eiichi Ohta; Anne T Hunt; Gary F Rogers; John B Mulliken; Curtis K Deutsch
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2008-05

8.  Picture perfect? Reliability of craniofacial anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry.

Authors:  Carrie L Heike; Michael L Cunningham; Anne V Hing; Erik Stuhaug; Jacqueline R Starr
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  Contributions of forensic anthropology to positive scientific identification: a critical Review.

Authors:  Douglas H Ubelaker; Austin Shamlou; Amanda Kunkle
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2018-10-08

Review 10.  The role of forensic anthropology in disaster victim identification (DVI): recent developments and future prospects.

Authors:  Hans H de Boer; Soren Blau; Tania Delabarde; Lucina Hackman
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2018-10-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Digital pair-matching of iliac bones: pilot study on a three-dimensional approach with models acquired through stereophotogrammetry.

Authors:  Andrea Palamenghi; Debora Mazzarelli; Annalisa Cappella; Danilo De Angelis; Chiarella Sforza; Cristina Cattaneo; Daniele Gibelli
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 2.791

2.  Pharmacological History of Missing Subjects: Perspective of a Correction Factor to Aid in the Study of Bone Remains.

Authors:  Camilla Cecannecchia; Benedetta Baldari; Andrea Cioffi
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.