Literature DB >> 33244441

Novel galenic formulations for delivering immunochemotherapies: kill intelligently, remove the checkpoint and let the T cells in!

Oliver Kepp1,2, Guido Kroemer1,2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33244441      PMCID: PMC7678943          DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1846358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


× No keyword cloud information.
Anticancer immunotherapy has revolutionized the clinical routine of antineoplastic regimen offering novel treatment options for patients with advanced and therapy-resistant disease. In particular immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with monoclonal antibodies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction to restore T cell function, has shown promising effects that last beyond treatment discontinuation. Nevertheless, ICB is often overshadowed by severe side effects and only efficient in a minority of patients, resulting in an objective response rate of only 20–40% even under optimal conditions.[1] The cocktail therapy consists of a nanoparticle-mediated targeted delivery to the tumor of doxorubicin and a co-delivery of plasmids coding for a small hairpin RNA specific to PD-L1 (pshPD-L1) and hyaluronidase (pSpam1). The immunogenic chemotherapeutic doxorubicin induces immunogenic cell death (ICD) in the tumor and leads to the emission of danger associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that facilitate the attraction and maturation dendritic cells (DCs) and the priming of T cells. shRNA-mediated PD-L1 downregulation in the tumor mimics the effect of immune checkpoint blockade, thus reestablishing T-cell functionality. Furthermore, hyaluronidase expression targets the immunosuppressive extracellular matrix (ECM) and facilitates the infiltration of peripheral T cells. The combination of immunogenic chemotherapy with gene therapy-mediated immune checkpoint blockade and ECM degradation results in efficient anticancer immunity The induction of immunogenic cell death (ICD) in malignant cells is yet another immunotherapeutic approach that aims at increasing the adjuvanticity of cancers, thus favoring the dendritic cell (DC)-mediated presentation of tumor antigens to cytotoxic T lymphocytes. ICD leads to the release of danger associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) such as ATP and annexin A1 from stressed and dying cancer cells. ATP and annexin A1 facilitate the chemoattraction and chemotaxis of DCs. Moreover, the ICD-associated surface exposure of calreticulin and the exodus of HMGB1 from the malignant cells promote the transfer of tumor antigens into DCs and their subsequent processing, thus favoring the ignition of T cell-mediated adaptive immunity.[2] Recently, the inhibition of DNA-to-RNA transcription by cytotoxic drugs was described as a cardinal mechanism governing ICD.[3] Several preclinical studies have shown that ICD induced by chemotherapy or radiotherapy sensitizes to subsequent immunotherapy.[4] Thus, ICD induction with oxaliplatin and cyclophosphamide sensitized non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) expressing oncogenic Kras and lacking Trp53 to anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1-mediated double ICB.[5] Along similar lines the combination of cisplatin with the ICD enhancer crizotinib sensitized NSCLC models to subsequent PD-1 blockade, leading to the cure of ~90% of orthotopic lung cancers.[6] These findings have been corroborated by a clinical trial showing that the pretreatment with the ICD inducer doxorubicin increased the likelihood of response to PD-1 blockade in women with triple negative breast cancer.[7,8] It needs to be mentioned that this trial had only a limited number of patients in Phase I and that the results showed some degree of inter-arm variability.[9] In a recent issue of Science Advances, Wu and colleagues described a novel approach for the functional combination of ICD and ICB with the additional expression of extracellular matrix (ECM)-degrading hyaluronidase, together yielding elevated levels of tumor associated CD8+ T-cells and resulting anticancer immunity in several subcutaneous models of cancer.[10] This so-called “cocktail therapy” consists of an acid-responsive nanoparticle-delivery system facilitating the tumor-specific delivery of ICD-inducing doxorubicin and the parallel distribution of a plasmid encoding a small hairpin RNA targeting PD-L1 as an alternative to antibody-mediated ICB. Indeed, this cocktail therapy can be administered intravenously, and the nanoparticles (which either contain doxorubicin or DNA) are then preferentially taken up by tumor cells located in an acidic milieu, thus avoiding the cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin and the immune-related (systemic) adverse effects of PD-L1 blockade, but achieving a local ICD and ICB effect.[10] However, the immunogenic chemotherapy and PD-L1-targeting gene therapy had to be combined with the delivery of DNA encoding for hyaluronidase to be optimally efficient, pointing to an important immunosuppressive role for the ECM that inhibits tumor infiltration by peripheral T cells (Figure 1). Cocktail therapy achieved tumor eradication of B16F10 melanoma in 5 out of 6 mice and allowed prolonged tumor growth control in several other models of subcutaneous cancers. Furthermore, cocktail therapy led to the generation of CD8+ effector memory T cells in the spleen, inhibited the establishment of lung metastasis and prolonged overall survival. Altogether, this study underlines the efficacy of combinations of ICD and ICB, that can be optimized by tumor-targeted delivery systems as well as by approaches targeting ECM.[10]
Figure 1.

The cocktail therapy consists of a nanoparticle-mediated targeted delivery to the tumor of doxorubicin and a co-delivery of plasmids coding for a small hairpin RNA specific to PD-L1 (pshPD-L1) and hyaluronidase (pSpam1). The immunogenic chemotherapeutic doxorubicin induces immunogenic cell death (ICD) in the tumor and leads to the emission of danger associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that facilitate the attraction and maturation dendritic cells (DCs) and the priming of T cells. shRNA-mediated PD-L1 downregulation in the tumor mimics the effect of immune checkpoint blockade, thus reestablishing T-cell functionality. Furthermore, hyaluronidase expression targets the immunosuppressive extracellular matrix (ECM) and facilitates the infiltration of peripheral T cells. The combination of immunogenic chemotherapy with gene therapy-mediated immune checkpoint blockade and ECM degradation results in efficient anticancer immunity

In sum, the work by Wu et al. introduces a toolbox for the targeted induction of ICD, subversion of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, as well as the restoration of T-cell mediated immunity. It will be interesting to witness if all (or some) of these strategies will have translational value and hence will be successfully evaluated in cancer patients.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Immunogenic cell death in cancer and infectious disease.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galluzzi; Aitziber Buqué; Oliver Kepp; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 53.106

2.  Clinical evidence that immunogenic cell death sensitizes to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade.

Authors:  Oliver Kepp; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 8.110

3.  Immunogenic Chemotherapy Sensitizes Tumors to Checkpoint Blockade Therapy.

Authors:  Christina Pfirschke; Camilla Engblom; Steffen Rickelt; Virna Cortez-Retamozo; Christopher Garris; Ferdinando Pucci; Takahiro Yamazaki; Vichnou Poirier-Colame; Andita Newton; Younes Redouane; Yi-Jang Lin; Gregory Wojtkiewicz; Yoshiko Iwamoto; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Tiffany G Huynh; Richard O Hynes; Gordon J Freeman; Guido Kroemer; Laurence Zitvogel; Ralph Weissleder; Mikael J Pittet
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 4.  Safety of combining radiotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibition.

Authors:  William L Hwang; Luke R G Pike; Trevor J Royce; Brandon A Mahal; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  An immune cocktail therapy to realize multiple boosting of the cancer-immunity cycle by combination of drug/gene delivery nanoparticles.

Authors:  Jiayan Wu; Jie Chen; Yuanji Feng; Sijia Zhang; Lin Lin; Zhaopei Guo; Pingjie Sun; Caina Xu; Huayu Tian; Xuesi Chen
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Immune induction strategies in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer to enhance the sensitivity to PD-1 blockade: the TONIC trial.

Authors:  Leonie Voorwerk; Maarten Slagter; Hugo M Horlings; Karolina Sikorska; Koen K van de Vijver; Michiel de Maaker; Iris Nederlof; Roelof J C Kluin; Sarah Warren; SuFey Ong; Terry G Wiersma; Nicola S Russell; Ferry Lalezari; Philip C Schouten; Noor A M Bakker; Steven L C Ketelaars; Dennis Peters; Charlotte A H Lange; Erik van Werkhoven; Harm van Tinteren; Ingrid A M Mandjes; Inge Kemper; Suzanne Onderwater; Myriam Chalabi; Sofie Wilgenhof; John B A G Haanen; Roberto Salgado; Karin E de Visser; Gabe S Sonke; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Sabine C Linn; Ton N Schumacher; Christian U Blank; Marleen Kok
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 7.  Immunological impact of cell death signaling driven by radiation on the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Maria Esperanza Rodriguez-Ruiz; Ilio Vitale; Kevin J Harrington; Ignacio Melero; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 25.606

8.  Crizotinib-induced immunogenic cell death in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Liwei Zhao; Jonathan Pol; Sarah Levesque; Adriana Petrazzuolo; Christina Pfirschke; Camilla Engblom; Steffen Rickelt; Takahiro Yamazaki; Kristina Iribarren; Laura Senovilla; Lucillia Bezu; Erika Vacchelli; Valentina Sica; Andréa Melis; Tiffany Martin; Lin Xia; Heng Yang; Qingqing Li; Jinfeng Chen; Sylvère Durand; Fanny Aprahamian; Deborah Lefevre; Sophie Broutin; Angelo Paci; Amaury Bongers; Veronique Minard-Colin; Eric Tartour; Laurence Zitvogel; Lionel Apetoh; Yuting Ma; Mikael J Pittet; Oliver Kepp; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Inhibition of transcription by dactinomycin reveals a new characteristic of immunogenic cell stress.

Authors:  Juliette Humeau; Allan Sauvat; Giulia Cerrato; Wei Xie; Friedemann Loos; Francesca Iannantuoni; Lucillia Bezu; Sarah Lévesque; Juliette Paillet; Jonathan Pol; Marion Leduc; Laurence Zitvogel; Hugues de Thé; Oliver Kepp; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 12.137

10.  Immune induction strategies to enhance responses to PD-1 blockade: lessons from the TONIC trial.

Authors:  Sandra Demaria; Emanuela Romano; Muriel Brackstone; Silvia C Formenti
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 13.751

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.