Literature DB >> 33243843

Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm detecting 10 common abnormalities on chest radiographs.

Ju Gang Nam1,2, Minchul Kim3, Jongchan Park3, Eui Jin Hwang1,2, Jong Hyuk Lee1,2, Jung Hee Hong1,2, Jin Mo Goo1,2,4, Chang Min Park5,2,4.   

Abstract

We aimed to develop a deep learning algorithm detecting 10 common abnormalities (DLAD-10) on chest radiographs, and to evaluate its impact in diagnostic accuracy, timeliness of reporting and workflow efficacy.DLAD-10 was trained with 146 717 radiographs from 108 053 patients using a ResNet34-based neural network with lesion-specific channels for 10 common radiological abnormalities (pneumothorax, mediastinal widening, pneumoperitoneum, nodule/mass, consolidation, pleural effusion, linear atelectasis, fibrosis, calcification and cardiomegaly). For external validation, the performance of DLAD-10 on a same-day computed tomography (CT)-confirmed dataset (normal:abnormal 53:147) and an open-source dataset (PadChest; normal:abnormal 339:334) was compared with that of three radiologists. Separate simulated reading tests were conducted on another dataset adjusted to real-world disease prevalence in the emergency department, consisting of four critical, 52 urgent and 146 nonurgent cases. Six radiologists participated in the simulated reading sessions with and without DLAD-10.DLAD-10 exhibited area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.895-1.00 in the CT-confirmed dataset and 0.913-0.997 in the PadChest dataset. DLAD-10 correctly classified significantly more critical abnormalities (95.0% (57/60)) than pooled radiologists (84.4% (152/180); p=0.01). In simulated reading tests for emergency department patients, pooled readers detected significantly more critical (70.8% (17/24) versus 29.2% (7/24); p=0.006) and urgent (82.7% (258/312) versus 78.2% (244/312); p=0.04) abnormalities when aided by DLAD-10. DLAD-10 assistance shortened the mean±sd time-to-report critical and urgent radiographs (640.5±466.3 versus 3371.0±1352.5 s and 1840.3±1141.1 versus 2127.1±1468.2 s, respectively; all p<0.01) and reduced the mean±sd interpretation time (20.5±22.8 versus 23.5±23.7 s; p<0.001).DLAD-10 showed excellent performance, improving radiologists' performance and shortening the reporting time for critical and urgent cases.
Copyright ©ERS 2021.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33243843     DOI: 10.1183/13993003.03061-2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  9 in total

1.  External Validation of Deep Learning Algorithms for Radiologic Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alice C Yu; Bahram Mohajer; John Eng
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Development and Validation of a Multimodal-Based Prognosis and Intervention Prediction Model for COVID-19 Patients in a Multicenter Cohort.

Authors:  Jeong Hoon Lee; Jong Seok Ahn; Myung Jin Chung; Yeon Joo Jeong; Jin Hwan Kim; Jae Kwang Lim; Jin Young Kim; Young Jae Kim; Jong Eun Lee; Eun Young Kim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Applications of artificial intelligence in the thorax: a narrative review focusing on thoracic radiology.

Authors:  Yisak Kim; Ji Yoon Park; Eui Jin Hwang; Sang Min Lee; Chang Min Park
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Role of Deep Learning in Predicting Aging-Related Diseases: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Jyotsna Talreja Wassan; Huiru Zheng; Haiying Wang
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Development and validation of an abnormality-derived deep-learning diagnostic system for major respiratory diseases.

Authors:  Chengdi Wang; Jiechao Ma; Shu Zhang; Jun Shao; Yanyan Wang; Hong-Yu Zhou; Lujia Song; Jie Zheng; Yizhou Yu; Weimin Li
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-08-23

6.  Successful Implementation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection System for Chest Radiography in Daily Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Seungsoo Lee; Hyun Joo Shin; Sungwon Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 7.109

7.  Association of Artificial Intelligence-Aided Chest Radiograph Interpretation With Reader Performance and Efficiency.

Authors:  Jong Seok Ahn; Shadi Ebrahimian; Shaunagh McDermott; Sanghyup Lee; Laura Naccarato; John F Di Capua; Markus Y Wu; Eric W Zhang; Victorine Muse; Benjamin Miller; Farid Sabzalipour; Bernardo C Bizzo; Keith J Dreyer; Parisa Kaviani; Subba R Digumarthy; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-08-01

8.  Localization-adjusted diagnostic performance and assistance effect of a computer-aided detection system for pneumothorax and consolidation.

Authors:  Sun Yeop Lee; Sangwoo Ha; Min Gyeong Jeon; Hao Li; Hyunju Choi; Hwa Pyung Kim; Ye Ra Choi; Hoseok I; Yeon Joo Jeong; Yoon Ha Park; Hyemin Ahn; Sang Hyup Hong; Hyun Jung Koo; Choong Wook Lee; Min Jae Kim; Yeon Joo Kim; Kyung Won Kim; Jong Mun Choi
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-07-30

Review 9.  The Added Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Physicians' Performance in Detecting Thoracic Pathologies on CT and Chest X-ray: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dana Li; Lea Marie Pehrson; Carsten Ammitzbøl Lauridsen; Lea Tøttrup; Marco Fraccaro; Desmond Elliott; Hubert Dariusz Zając; Sune Darkner; Jonathan Frederik Carlsen; Michael Bachmann Nielsen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.