Literature DB >> 33243823

Proposal of a scale for COVID-19 stigma-discrimination toward health workers.

Adalberto Campo-Arias1, Isabel Álvarez-Solorza2, Andrés Felipe Tirado-Otálvaro3, Carlos Arturo Cassiani-Miranda4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  psychological; stress

Year:  2020        PMID: 33243823      PMCID: PMC7692020          DOI: 10.1136/jim-2020-001647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Investig Med        ISSN: 1081-5589            Impact factor:   2.895


× No keyword cloud information.
Stigma-discrimination occurs in three situations: exploitation-domination, social control, and avoiding diseases.1 It has been thought that, as with other infectious diseases, COVID-19 would be a source of stigma-discrimination in affected people.2 However, it was thought unlikely that stigma-discrimination would fall on health workers who care for patients with COVID-19.3 Stigma-discrimination may be associated with a high level of anxiety. Monterrosa-Castro et al4 recently reported a prevalence of 39% of symptoms of anxiety among Colombian general practitioners. The study aimed to design a scale to quantify COVID-19 stigma-discrimination. An online psychometric study was performed, and the questionnaire included informed consent and demographic information, and was sent to students’ email available on the institution’s platform. The questionnaire was available from July 3 to August 10, 2020. The study included 1108 students of a university who take pregraduate and postgraduate programs; all were residents of Mexico and were aged between 18 and 60 years old (M=21.5, SD=4.4), 80.4% of whom were women and 97.0% with a bachelor’s degree. The subjects completed an 18-point questionnaire with a dichotomous response pattern, and included questions about foreign people, patients with COVID-19, and health workers. Table 1 presents all the items studied. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were applied to select items with the best performance. Robust diagonally weighted least squares were used as the extraction method, with a tetrachoric correlation matrix for factor extraction; this method is specific for factor analysis of ordinal data.5 Internal consistency was tested using Kuder-Richardson’s coefficient,6 an equivalent of Cronbach’s alpha for a dichotomous answer,7 and McDonald’s omega.8 Factor analyses were done in the Factor Analysis program,9 and internal consistency was computed in Jamovi V.1.2.27.0.10
Table 1

COVID-19 Stigma-Discrimination Toward Health Workers Scale

ItemYesNo
1. Are all foreign nationals at higher risk of transmitting COVID-19?
2. Is COVID-19 a divine punishment?
3. Should people fear those who are sick with COVID-19?
4. Are people sick with COVID-19 afraid to tell others that they have this disease?
5. When I see news and stories about COVID-19 on television, press, or social media, do I get nervous or anxious?
6. Is it embarrassing to be sick with COVID-19?
7. Should people feel sorry for persons who are sick with COVID-19?
8. Do people get sick with COVID-19 due to irresponsible behaviors?
9. Should people who work in health services and are in contact with COVID-19 patients be isolated from society?*
10. Should family members treat people with COVID-19 with less respect?
11. Should people sick with COVID-19 be rejected by society?
12. Can people sick with COVID-19 be neighbors of those who do not suffer from this disease?
13. Am I afraid of being infected by the health personnel I meet in public transportation, on the street, or at home?*
14. Are people sick with COVID-19 guilty of having acquired this disease?
15. Should people who have recovered from COVID-19 stay away from their worksites?
16. Should people who work in health services avoid using public transport so as not to infect the population?*
17. Should health personnel avoid returning home so as not to infect their family?*
18. Should health personnel avoid going out to the street so as not to infect the population?*

*Items that showed better performance as a scale in the factor analysis.

COVID-19 Stigma-Discrimination Toward Health Workers Scale *Items that showed better performance as a scale in the factor analysis. Five items showed the best performance in the subsequent factor analysis. The polychoric correlation matrix showed good adequacy (Bartlett’s χ2=2184.5, df=10, p<0.001, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test=0.83, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.860). The exploratory factor analysis showed one factor with eigenvalue of 3.07, which explained 61.3% of the variance. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the structure, and goodness-of-fit indicators were excellent (table 2). The Kuder-Richardson’s coefficient was 0.67, while the McDonald’s omega was 0.68.
Table 2

Goodness-of-fit indicators

IndicatorValue
Robust mean and variance-adjusted χ210.2, df=5, p=0.07
Root mean square error of approximation0.03 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.05)
Comparative fit index0.99
Tucker-Lewis index0.99
Weighted root mean square residual0.02 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.03)
Goodness-of-fit indicators Factor analysis is the best technique to construct health scales. The present investigation showed the scale on stigma-discrimination toward health personnel due to COVID-19 showed excellent goodness-of-fit indicators11 12 and acceptable internal consistency.13 It is crucial to have an instrument that measures stigma-discrimination toward health professionals during the COVID-19 epidemic as negative attitudes can affect healthcare-seeking and increase COVID-19 collateral damage.14 It also opens the possibility of stigma-discrimination persisting among professionals who work in areas with people with different types of infections. Stigma-discrimination is a stressor with a negative impact on the health of the victims.15 The findings of this study suggest that this scale can be used to quantify stigma-discrimination toward health workers.
  4 in total

1.  Mental health outcomes and risk factors among female physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Daniela León Rojas; Fabiola Castorena Torres; Barbara Garza Ornelas; Julieta Rodríguez-de-Ita
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-04-28

2.  Development & validation of scales to assess stigma related to COVID-19 in India.

Authors:  Saritha Nair; Aparna Joshi; Sumit Aggarwal; Tulsi Adhikari; Nupur Mahajan; Vishal Diwan; A Stephen; K Rekha Devi; Bijaya Kumar Mishra; Girijesh Kumar Yadav; Rewa Kohli; Damodar Sahu; Bal Kishan Gulati; Saurabh Sharma; Jeetendra Yadav; Senthanro Ovung; Chetna Duggal; Moina Sharma; Sampada Dipak Bangar; Rushikesh Andhalkar; Pricilla B Rebecca; S Rani; Pradeep Selvaraj; Gladston G Xavier; Vanessa Peter; Basilea Watson; T Kannan; K S Md Asmathulla; Debdutta Bhattacharya; Jyotirmayee Turuk; Subrata Kumar Palo; Srikanta Kanungo; Ajit Kumar Behera; Ashok Kumar Pandey; Kamran Zaman; Brij Ranjan Misra; Niraj Kumar; Sthita Pragnya Behera; Rajeev Singh; Abu Hasan Sarkar; Kanwar Narain; Rajni Kant; Seema Sahay; Rajnarayan Ramshankar Tiwari; Beena Elizabeth Thomas; Samiran Panda; M Vishnu Vardhana Rao
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.274

3.  Validity and Reliability of a COVID-19 Stigma Scale Using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis in a Sample of Egyptian Physicians: E16-COVID19-S.

Authors:  Aya Mostafa; Nayera S Mostafa; Nashwa Ismail
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  [Network relationships of the stigma-discrimination complex and fear of COVID-19 during the second pandemic wave in Peruvian adults].

Authors:  Cristian Ramos-Vera
Journal:  Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed)       Date:  2021-06-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.