| Literature DB >> 33243140 |
Takashi Seiko1, Takushi Kishida2, Mina Toyama3, Takahiko Hariyama3, Takashi Okitsu4, Akimori Wada4, Mamoru Toda5, Yoko Satta1, Yohey Terai6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evolutionary transitions from terrestrial to aquatic life history cause drastic changes in sensory systems. Indeed, the drastic changes in vision have been reported in many aquatic amniotes, convergently. Recently, the opsin genes of the full-aquatic sea snakes have been reported. However, those of the amphibious sea snakes have not been examined in detail.Entities:
Keywords: Aquatic amniotes; Opsin genes; Sea snakes; Visual adaptation; Visual pigments
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33243140 PMCID: PMC7690139 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-020-01725-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1The amino acid replacements at spectra tuning positions of RH1 (left) and LWS (right) among the species analyzed in the study. Amino acids identical to the top line are indicated by dots. The amino acid replacements shown on or under the branches. Amino acid replacement in RH1 is shown as “RH1: S292A”. “H/N” indicates heterozygous at this position. A phylogenetic tree was modified based on previous studies [5]
Chromophore usage in snakes
| Family | Subfamily | Genus | Species | Chromophore usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colubridae | Colubrinae | A1-derived | ||
| A1-derived | ||||
| A1-derived | ||||
| Elapidae | Laticaudinae | A1-derived | ||
| A1-derived | ||||
| Hydrophiinae | A1-derived |
Fig. 2Absorption spectra of RH1 and LWS pigments evaluated by dark–light difference spectra. RH1 pigments were constructed from a S. japonicus boettgeri, b L. semifasciata, c E. ijimae, and d H. ornatus. LWS pigments were constructed from e H. ornatus. The absorption from mutants of RH1 pigments are shown in f A292 and 292P, and g 181H and 181N
Fig. 3The λmax values for (a) LWS and (b) RH1. The values in bold and regular font are from measurements and prediction, respectively. The λmax values in ancestors are shown in parentheses on or under the branches. The values with plus and minus indicate red and blue shifts, respectively. Phylogenetic trees were modified based on previous studies [5]. Solid and gray blanches indicate terrestrial and aquatic lineages, respectively. c The λmax distributions are shown in gray boxes (RH1) and circles (LWS). The λmax values from H. platurus LWS are predicted from both the 181H and 181N alleles
Fig. 4The depth distribution ranges of the prey fish species identified from the stomach contents of a L. semifasciata, b L. laticaudata, and c L. colbrina. The boxes indicate the water-depth distribution range of each species. Each lane indicates the species as follows: a 1 Halichoeres trimaculatus, 2 Suezichthys soelae, 3 Acanthurus mata, 4 Ctenochaetus striatus, 5 Thalassoma amblycephalum, 6 Abudefduf sexfasciatus, 7 Parapercis clathrata, 8 Parapercis schauinslandii, 9 Caesio diagramma, 10 Chirrhitichthys aprinus, 11 Grammistes sexlineatus, 12 Centropyge heraldi; b 1 Cirrimaxilla Formosa, 2 Myrichthys colubrinus, 3 Myrichthys maculosus, 4 Scolecenchelys laticaudata, 5 Gymnothorax undulates, 6 G. margaritophorus, 7 Conger cf. ‘cinereus’, 8 C. cinereus, 9 G. albimarginatus, 10 G. chilospilus, 11 G. eurostus, 12 G. moluccensis, 13 G. nudivomer, 14 G. pindae, 15 G. reevesi, 16 G. reticularis, 17 G. richardsonii, 18 Myrichtys maculosus, 19 Myrophis microchir, 20 Plotosus lineatus, 21 Strophidon sathete, 22 Uropterygius concolor; c 1 Echidna polyzona 2 Echidna nebulosi, 3 Gymnomuraena zebra, 4 G. javanicus, 5 Uropterygius nagoensis, 6 C. cinereus
Fig. 5Comparison of opsin evolution between aquatic amniote groups