Sarra Jazi1, Leila Ben-Amor1,2, Pascale Abadie1,3,4, Marie-Line Menard5, Rachel Choquette6, Claude Berthiaume1,4, Laurent Mottron1,3,4, Drigissa Ilies1,3,4. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Addictology, 5622University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2. Department of Child and Adolescents Psychiatry, CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 3. Child and Adolescents Psychiatry Division, Department of Psychiatry, Rivière-des-Prairies Mental Health Hospital, CIUSSS-NIM, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 4. CIUSSS-NIM Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 5. Children's Hospital of Nice, University Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Côte d'Azur University, Nice, France. 6. Faculty of Pharmacy, 5622University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The potential metabolic adverse effects of second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) need to be monitored. The Canadian Alliance for Monitoring Effectiveness and Safety of Antipsychotics (CAMESA) offers guidelines for this purpose. We aimed to evaluate the long-term rates of youths receiving monitoring in mental health clinics and document the factors that may influence them. METHOD: The charts of 180 patients (13.3 ± 3.1 years, 54.4% males) receiving SGA treatment for the first time between January 2016 and June 2018 were reviewed. Monitoring was divided into baseline and 1- to 6-month and 9- to 24-month periods. Population under study was stratified into children (4 to 12 years) and adolescents (13 to 18 years). Sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric diagnosis and comorbidities, prescribed SGAs and comedications, anthropometric measures (AM), blood pressure (BP), blood tests (BT), electrocardiogram, and the psychiatrist's years of practice were collected. Cross tables were used to present the monitoring rates. Categories were compared by covariate analysis. Rates of patients monitored across categories were compared using Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Monitoring rates for AM, BT, and BP were 55%, 47.8%, and 46.7% at baseline; 50%, 41.7%, and 45.2% at 1 to 6 months; and 47.2%, 41.5%, and 40.6% at 9 to 24 months, respectively. Higher monitoring rates were significantly associated with adolescent status (baseline, 1 to 6 months), a diagnosis of psychotic and/or affective disorder (baseline, 1 to 6 months, 9 to 24 months), having ≤1 psychiatric comorbidities (1 to 6 months), high SGA dose (baseline, 1 to 6 months), and clinician's experience (baseline, 9 to 24 months). Significantly lower monitoring rates were associated with the psychostimulant/atomoxetine comedication (baseline, 1 to 6 months, 9 to 24 months). CONCLUSION: Five years after publication of the CAMESA guidelines, metabolic monitoring is conducted for less than half of patients. In our sample, age, diagnostic category, psychiatric comorbidities, SGA dose, clinician's experience, and comedications influenced the monitoring rates. Major progress still needs to be made before reaching a satisfactory level of monitoring.
OBJECTIVE: The potential metabolic adverse effects of second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) need to be monitored. The Canadian Alliance for Monitoring Effectiveness and Safety of Antipsychotics (CAMESA) offers guidelines for this purpose. We aimed to evaluate the long-term rates of youths receiving monitoring in mental health clinics and document the factors that may influence them. METHOD: The charts of 180 patients (13.3 ± 3.1 years, 54.4% males) receiving SGA treatment for the first time between January 2016 and June 2018 were reviewed. Monitoring was divided into baseline and 1- to 6-month and 9- to 24-month periods. Population under study was stratified into children (4 to 12 years) and adolescents (13 to 18 years). Sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric diagnosis and comorbidities, prescribed SGAs and comedications, anthropometric measures (AM), blood pressure (BP), blood tests (BT), electrocardiogram, and the psychiatrist's years of practice were collected. Cross tables were used to present the monitoring rates. Categories were compared by covariate analysis. Rates of patients monitored across categories were compared using Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Monitoring rates for AM, BT, and BP were 55%, 47.8%, and 46.7% at baseline; 50%, 41.7%, and 45.2% at 1 to 6 months; and 47.2%, 41.5%, and 40.6% at 9 to 24 months, respectively. Higher monitoring rates were significantly associated with adolescent status (baseline, 1 to 6 months), a diagnosis of psychotic and/or affective disorder (baseline, 1 to 6 months, 9 to 24 months), having ≤1 psychiatric comorbidities (1 to 6 months), high SGA dose (baseline, 1 to 6 months), and clinician's experience (baseline, 9 to 24 months). Significantly lower monitoring rates were associated with the psychostimulant/atomoxetine comedication (baseline, 1 to 6 months, 9 to 24 months). CONCLUSION: Five years after publication of the CAMESA guidelines, metabolic monitoring is conducted for less than half of patients. In our sample, age, diagnostic category, psychiatric comorbidities, SGA dose, clinician's experience, and comedications influenced the monitoring rates. Major progress still needs to be made before reaching a satisfactory level of monitoring.
Authors: Marc De Hert; Johan Detraux; Ruud van Winkel; Weiping Yu; Christoph U Correll Journal: Nat Rev Endocrinol Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 43.330
Authors: Rebecca F McKnight; Marc Adida; Katie Budge; Sarah Stockton; Guy M Goodwin; John R Geddes Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: David Fraguas; Christoph U Correll; Jessica Merchán-Naranjo; Marta Rapado-Castro; Mara Parellada; Carmen Moreno; Celso Arango Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Chadi A Calarge; Laura Acion; Samuel Kuperman; Michael Tansey; Janet A Schlechte Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.576