INTRODUCTION: Human regular U-500 insulin (U-500R) is approved for subcutaneous (SC) injection in patients with diabetes requiring >200 units/day of insulin. Here, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profiles following U-500R administered by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and SC injection in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on high-dose insulin were studied. METHODS: In this randomized, crossover, euglycemic clamp study, patients received a 100-unit bolus of U-500R via SC injection or CSII with basal infusion using a U-500R specific pump. PK parameters were estimated using non-compartmental methods. PD estimates were derived from the glucose infusion rate during the euglycemic clamp procedure. RESULTS: When corrected for the basal infusion, the PK profiles for the 100-unit bolus of U-500R were similar for CSII and SC injection. Without correction for basal infusion, PK and PD profiles showed a greater insulin concentration and effect when U-500R was administered via CSII compared to SC injection, primarily due to basal insulin infusion for CSII. The ratio of geometric least squares AUC0-tlast means SC:CSII (90% CI) is 0.857 (0.729, 1.01) with correction (mean AUC0-tlast: 5230 pmol*L/h [SC injection] and 6070 pmol*L/h [CSII, with correction]) and 0.424 (0.361, 0.499) without correction (mean AUC0-tlast: 12300 pmol*L/h [CSII, without correction]). Median time-to-peak insulin concentration was six hours (range 0.5-8 hours) via SC injection and five hours (0.5-12 hours) via CSII. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with T2D on high-dose insulin, U-500R PK/PD parameters were similar for a 100-unit bolus when given by SC injection or CSII via a U-500R pump.
INTRODUCTION: Human regular U-500 insulin (U-500R) is approved for subcutaneous (SC) injection in patients with diabetes requiring >200 units/day of insulin. Here, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profiles following U-500R administered by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and SC injection in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on high-dose insulin were studied. METHODS: In this randomized, crossover, euglycemic clamp study, patients received a 100-unit bolus of U-500R via SC injection or CSII with basal infusion using a U-500R specific pump. PK parameters were estimated using non-compartmental methods. PD estimates were derived from the glucose infusion rate during the euglycemic clamp procedure. RESULTS: When corrected for the basal infusion, the PK profiles for the 100-unit bolus of U-500R were similar for CSII and SC injection. Without correction for basal infusion, PK and PD profiles showed a greater insulin concentration and effect when U-500R was administered via CSII compared to SC injection, primarily due to basal insulin infusion for CSII. The ratio of geometric least squares AUC0-tlast means SC:CSII (90% CI) is 0.857 (0.729, 1.01) with correction (mean AUC0-tlast: 5230 pmol*L/h [SC injection] and 6070 pmol*L/h [CSII, with correction]) and 0.424 (0.361, 0.499) without correction (mean AUC0-tlast: 12300 pmol*L/h [CSII, without correction]). Median time-to-peak insulin concentration was six hours (range 0.5-8 hours) via SC injection and five hours (0.5-12 hours) via CSII. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with T2D on high-dose insulin, U-500R PK/PD parameters were similar for a 100-unit bolus when given by SC injection or CSII via a U-500R pump.
Authors: Wendy S Lane; Elaine K Cochran; Jeffrey A Jackson; Jamie L Scism-Bacon; Ilene B Corey; Irl B Hirsch; Jay S Skyler Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2009 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Robert C Hood; Richard F Arakaki; Carol Wysham; Ying G Li; Julie A Settles; Jeffrey A Jackson Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Elizabeth L Eby; Anthony J Zagar; Ping Wang; Bradley H Curtis; Jin Xie; Diane C Haldane; Iskandar Idris; Anne L Peters; Robert C Hood; Jeffrey A Jackson Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Elizabeth L Eby; Ping Wang; Bradley H Curtis; Jin Xie; Diane C Haldane; Iskandar Idris; Anne L Peters; Robert C Hood; Jeffrey A Jackson Journal: J Med Econ Date: 2013-02-12 Impact factor: 2.448
Authors: Amparo de la Peña; Matthew Riddle; Linda A Morrow; Honghua H Jiang; Helle Linnebjerg; Adam Scott; Khin M Win; Marcus Hompesch; Kenneth F Mace; Jennie G Jacobson; Jeffrey A Jackson Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Rupendra T Shrestha; Anjali F Kumar; Abdisa Taddese; Ameer A Khowaja; Amir Moheet; Evan Olawsky; Lynn E Eberly; Elizabeth R Seaquist Journal: Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Date: 2018-09-10
Authors: George Grunberger; Anuj Bhargava; Trang Ly; Howard Zisser; Liza L Ilag; James Malone; Ludi Fan; Shuyu Zhang; Jennal Johnson Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2020-01-26 Impact factor: 6.577