| Literature DB >> 33242972 |
M Fabre1, S Ruiz-Martinez2,3, M E Monserrat Cantera2, A Cortizo Garrido2, Z Beunza Fabra2, M Peran1, R Benito4, P Mateo2, C Paules2,3, D Oros2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An increasing body of evidence has revealed that SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women could increase the risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Careful monitoring of pregnancies with COVID-19 and measures to prevent neonatal infection are warranted. Therefore, rapid antibody tests have been suggested as an efficient screening tool during pregnancy. CASES: We analysed the clinical performance during pregnancy of a rapid, lateral-flow immunochromatographic assay for qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM antibodies. We performed a universal screening including 169 patients during their last trimester of pregnancy. We present a series of 14 patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 immunochromatographic assay rapid test result. Immunochromatographic assay results were always confirmed by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassays for quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM+IgA antibodies as the gold standard. We observed a positive predictive value of 50% and a false positive rate of 50% in pregnant women, involving a significantly lower diagnostic performance than reported in non-pregnant patients. DISCUSSION: Our data suggest that although immunochromatographic assay rapid tests may be a fast and profitable screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection, they may have a high false positive rate and low positive predictive value in pregnant women. Therefore, immunochromatographic assay for qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM antibodies must be verified by other test in pregnant patients.Entities:
Keywords: Clinical studies; immunoassay; laboratory methods; pregnancy
Year: 2020 PMID: 33242972 DOI: 10.1177/0004563220980495
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Biochem ISSN: 0004-5632 Impact factor: 2.057