Literature DB >> 33242419

Safety and efficacy of amantadine, modafinil, and methylphenidate for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover, double-blind trial.

Bardia Nourbakhsh1, Nisha Revirajan2, Bridget Morris3, Christian Cordano2, Jennifer Creasman4, Michael Manguinao2, Kristen Krysko2, Alice Rutatangwa2, Caroline Auvray2, Salman Aljarallah3, Chengshi Jin4, Ellen Mowry5, Charles McCulloch4, Emmanuelle Waubant2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Methylphenidate, modafinil, and amantadine are commonly prescribed medications for alleviating fatigue in multiple sclerosis; however, the evidence supporting their efficacy is sparse and conflicting. Our goal was to compare the efficacy of these three medications with each other and placebo in patients with multiple sclerosis fatigue.
METHODS: In this randomised, placebo-controlled, four-sequence, four-period, crossover, double-blind trial, patients with multiple sclerosis who reported fatigue and had a Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) score of more than 33 were recruited at two academic multiple sclerosis centres in the USA. Participants received oral amantadine (up to 100 mg twice daily), modafinil (up to 100 mg twice daily), methylphenidate (up to 10 mg twice daily), or placebo, each given for up to 6 weeks. All patients were intended to receive all four study medications, in turn, in one of four different sequences with 2-week washout periods between medications. A biostatistician prepared a concealed allocation schedule, stratified by site, randomly assigning a sequence of medications in approximately a 1:1:1:1 ratio, in blocks of eight, to a consecutive series of numbers. The statistician and pharmacists had no role in assessing the participants or collecting data, and the participants, caregivers, and assessors were masked to allocation. The primary outcome measure was the MFIS measured while taking the highest tolerated dose at week 5 of each medication period, analysed by use of a linear mixed-effect regression model. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03185065 and is closed.
FINDINGS: Between Oct 4, 2017, and Feb 27, 2019, of 169 patients screened, 141 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of four medication administration sequences: 35 (25%) patients to the amantadine, placebo, modafinil, and methylphenidate sequence; 34 (24%) patients to the placebo, methylphenidate, amantadine, and modafinil sequence; 35 (25%) patients to the modafinil, amantadine, methylphenidate, and placebo sequence; and 37 (26%) patients to the methylphenidate, modafinil, placebo, and amantadine sequence. Data from 136 participants were available for the intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome. The estimated mean values of MFIS total scores at baseline and the maximal tolerated dose were as follows: 51·3 (95% CI 49·0-53·6) at baseline, 40·6 (38·2-43·1) with placebo, 41·3 (38·8-43·7) with amantadine, 39·0 (36·6-41·4) with modafinil, and 38·6 (36·2-41·0) with methylphenidate (p=0·20 for the overall medication effect in the linear mixed-effect regression model). As compared with placebo (38 [31%] of 124 patients), higher proportions of participants reported adverse events while taking amantadine (49 [39%] of 127 patients), modafinil (50 [40%] of 125 patients), and methylphenidate (51 [40%] of 129 patients). Three serious adverse events occurred during the study (pulmonary embolism and myocarditis while taking amantadine, and a multiple sclerosis exacerbation requiring hospital admission while taking modafinil).
INTERPRETATION: Amantadine, modafinil, and methylphenidate were not superior to placebo in improving multiple sclerosis fatigue and caused more frequent adverse events. The results of this study do not support an indiscriminate use of amantadine, modafinil, or methylphenidate for the treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. FUNDING: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33242419      PMCID: PMC7772747          DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30354-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  16 in total

1.  Characterizing fatigue phenotypes with other symptoms and clinically relevant outcomes among people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Matthew Plow; Douglas D Gunzler; Julia H C Chang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.440

2.  Sleep Quality in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Arshia Eshtiaghi; David Eapen-John; Kirill Zaslavsky; Reza Vosoughi; Brian J Murray; Edward Margolin
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2021-08-18

3.  The Relationship between Fatigue and a Clinically Accessible Measure of Switching in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Fareshte Erani; Joshua McKeever; John D Medaglia; Maria T Schultheis
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.448

4.  Phase II study of ketogenic diets in relapsing multiple sclerosis: safety, tolerability and potential clinical benefits.

Authors:  J Nicholas Brenton; Diana Lehner-Gulotta; Emma Woolbright; Brenda Banwell; A G Christina Bergqvist; Shanshan Chen; Rachael Coleman; Mark Conaway; Myla D Goldman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 13.654

5.  High prevalence of fatigue in contemporary patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Line Broch; Cecilia Smith Simonsen; Heidi Øyen Flemmen; Pål Berg-Hansen; Åshild Skardhamar; Heidi Ormstad; Elisabeth Gulowsen Celius
Journal:  Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin       Date:  2021-03-18

6.  Prevalence and burden of multiple sclerosis-related fatigue: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Abril Oliva Ramirez; Alexander Keenan; Olivia Kalau; Evelyn Worthington; Lucas Cohen; Sumeet Singh
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 7.  Co-occurrence of Fatigue and Depression in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Joanna Tarasiuk; Katarzyna Kapica-Topczewska; Agata Czarnowska; Monika Chorąży; Jan Kochanowicz; Alina Kułakowska
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 8.  Symptomatic and restorative therapies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Andrea Salazar-Camelo; Naveen George; Hesham Abboud; Sarah M Planchon; Marcelo Matiello; Maureen A Mealy; Andrew Goodman
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-09-05       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Amantadine: reappraisal of the timeless diamond-target updates and novel therapeutic potentials.

Authors:  Wojciech Danysz; Andrzej Dekundy; Astrid Scheschonka; Peter Riederer
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 10.  Antiviral Drugs in Influenza.

Authors:  Magdalena Świerczyńska; Dagmara M Mirowska-Guzel; Edyta Pindelska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.