| Literature DB >> 33242374 |
Francesco Saraceni1, Myriam Labopin2, Edouard Forcade3, Nicolaus Kröger4, Gerard Socié5, Riitta Niittyvuopio6, Jan J Cornelissen7, Hélène Labussière-Wallet8, Didier Blaise9, Goda Choi10, Jenny L Byrne11, Gaelle Guillerm12, Tony Marchand13, Jordi Esteve14, Ali Bazarbachi15, Bipin Savani16, Attilio Olivieri1, Arnon Nagler17, Mohamad Mohty2.
Abstract
Limited data are currently available on the outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) with a reduced performance status. We herein present the results of a registry study on 2,936 AML patients undergoing allo-SCT in first remission (CR1) with a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score less than or equal to 80%. Two-year leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, and relapse-free survival (GRFS) rates were 54%, 59%, and 41%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, patients with a KPS score = 80% had lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) and superior OS in comparison to patients with a KPS score <80% (p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients with a KPS score =80%, a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen was associated with an increased risk of relapse (p = 0.002) and lower GRFS (p < 0.001) compared to myeloablative conditioning (MAC). Differently, in patients with a KPS score <80%, a RIC regimen resulted in lower NRM (p < 0.001), whereas relapse incidence did not differ, thus leading to an improved GRFS (p = 0.008) as compared to MAC. A transplant from a matched sibling donor (MSD) was associated with a reduced incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD (p < 0.01) and NRM (p < 0.01) in comparison to other donor types. In conclusion, allo-SCT appears feasible in AML patients with a jeopardized KPS score. Survival is significantly affected by the conditioning intensity, which should be adjusted according to the severity of KPS impairment.Entities:
Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia; allogeneic stem cell transplant; karnofsky performance status score; myeloablative conditioning; reduced intensity conditioning
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33242374 PMCID: PMC7826477 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Med ISSN: 2045-7634 Impact factor: 4.452