Literature DB >> 33241477

Beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors: Could frailty and other morbidities explain the worse prognosis in patients undergoing pharmacologic stress?

Patricia Rodriguez Lozano1,2, Jamieson M Bourque3,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2020        PMID： 33241477      PMCID： PMC8144235          DOI： 10.1007/s12350-020-02441-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  39 in total

1.  Comparison of the current reasons for undergoing pharmacologic stress during echocardiographic and radionuclide stress testing.

Authors:  Edgar Argulian; Jose Ricardo F Po; Seth Uretsky; Kiran K Kommaraju; Suketukumar Patel; Vikram Agarwal; Randy Cohen; Alan Rozanski
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Does risk for major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing vasodilator stress with adjunctive exercise differ from patients undergoing either standard exercise or vasodilator stress with myocardial perfusion imaging?

Authors:  Sanjeev U Nair; Alan W Ahlberg; Deborah M Katten; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Trends in noninvasive testing for coronary artery disease: less exercise, less information.

Authors:  S Michael Gharacholou; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Cardiovascular outcomes are predicted by exercise-stress myocardial perfusion imaging: Impact on death, myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization procedures.

Authors:  Douglas S Lee; Flavia Verocai; Mansoor Husain; Darar Al Khdair; Xuesong Wang; Michael Freeman; Robert M Iwanochko
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Influence of mode of stress and coronary risk factor burden upon long-term mortality following normal stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging.

Authors:  Azhar Supariwala; Seth Uretsky; E Gordon Depuey; Gargi Thotakura; Sirisha Kanneganti; Narasimhanaidu Guriginjakunta; Radhika Vala; Mahesh Kuruba; Alan Rozanski
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing.

Authors:  Jonathan Myers; Manish Prakash; Victor Froelicher; Dat Do; Sara Partington; J Edwin Atwood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Gianrossi; R Detrano; D Mulvihill; K Lehmann; P Dubach; A Colombo; D McArthur; V Froelicher
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  The degree of ST-segment depression on symptom-limited exercise testing: relation to the myocardial ischemic burden as determined by thallium-201 scintigraphy.

Authors:  A J Taylor; M C Sackett; G A Beller
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Usefulness of Achieving ≥10 METs With a Negative Stress Electrocardiogram to Screen for High-Risk Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Referred for Coronary Angiography After Exercise Stress Testing.

Authors:  Adrián I Löffler; Margarita V Perez; Emmanuel O Nketiah; Jamieson M Bourque; Ellen C Keeley
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Prognostic value of estimated functional capacity incremental to cardiac biomarkers in stable cardiac patients.

Authors:  W H Wilson Tang; Eric J Topol; Yiying Fan; Yuping Wu; Leslie Cho; Cindy Stevenson; Stephen G Ellis; Stanley L Hazen
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 5.501
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.