Anup Kumar1, Manisha Dhanshetty1, Kaushik Banerjee1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Aflatoxin (AF) contamination is one of the major regulatory concerns for animal feed. As feed is a complex analytical matrix, validated methods on AFs in feed are scanty. The available methods involve a derivatization step before AF analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection (FLD). The aim of this study was thus to develop and validate a simple and rapid method for direct analysis of AFs (AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, AFG2) in a range of animal feed matrices.
METHODS: Feed samples were extracted with 80% methanol, followed by dilution with water and immmunoaffinity column cleanup. AFs were estimated using an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) instrument. Use of a large volume flow cell in FLD allowed direct analysis of all AFs with high sensitivity. The method was thoroughly validated in a range of feed matrices.
RESULTS: This sample preparation workflow minimized co-extractives, along with matrix interferences. In pigeon pea husk feed, the method provided a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.5 ng/g for each AF with recoveries of AF- B1, B2, G1, and G2 as 71.5, 75.6, 82.4, and 78.2%, respectively. The precision (relative standard deviation, RSD) was below 5%. A similar method performance was also recorded in other matrices, including wheat bran feed and poultry feed.
CONCLUSIONS: The optimized method is suitable for regulatory testing because it is simple, robust, cost-effective, and high throughput in nature, with high sensitivity and selectivity. HIGHLIGHTS: Our workflow has provided a straightforward method for the analysis of AFs in a wide range of animal feed matrices with high sensitivity, selectivity, throughput, and cost-effectiveness. The method allowed a direct analysis of AFs by UHPLC-FLD without a step of derivatization. © AOAC INTERNATIONAL 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Aflatoxin (AF) contamination is one of the major regulatory concerns for animal feed. As feed is a complex analytical matrix, validated methods on AFs in feed are scanty. The available methods involve a derivatization step before AF analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection (FLD). The aim of this study was thus to develop and validate a simple and rapid method for direct analysis of AFs (AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, AFG2) in a range of animal feed matrices.
METHODS: Feed samples were extracted with 80% methanol, followed by dilution with water and immmunoaffinity column cleanup. AFs were estimated using an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) instrument. Use of a large volume flow cell in FLD allowed direct analysis of all AFs with high sensitivity. The method was thoroughly validated in a range of feed matrices.
RESULTS: This sample preparation workflow minimized co-extractives, along with matrix interferences. In pigeon pea husk feed, the method provided a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.5 ng/g for each AF with recoveries of AF- B1, B2, G1, and G2 as 71.5, 75.6, 82.4, and 78.2%, respectively. The precision (relative standard deviation, RSD) was below 5%. A similar method performance was also recorded in other matrices, including wheat bran feed and poultry feed.
CONCLUSIONS: The optimized method is suitable for regulatory testing because it is simple, robust, cost-effective, and high throughput in nature, with high sensitivity and selectivity. HIGHLIGHTS: Our workflow has provided a straightforward method for the analysis of AFs in a wide range of animal feed matrices with high sensitivity, selectivity, throughput, and cost-effectiveness. The method allowed a direct analysis of AFs by UHPLC-FLD without a step of derivatization. © AOAC INTERNATIONAL 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Entities:
Mesh：
Substances：
Year: 2020
PMID： 33241328 DOI： 10.1093/jaoacint/qsz037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J AOAC Int ISSN： 1060-3271 Impact factor: 1.913