Literature DB >> 33241304

Technical details of the hand-sewn and circular-stapled anastomosis in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Eline M de Groot1, Thorben Möller2, B Feike Kingma1, Peter P Grimminger3, Thomas Becker2, Richard van Hillegersberg1, Jan-Hendrik Egberts2, Jelle P Ruurda1.   

Abstract

The circular mechanical and hand-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis are most often used in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE). The aim of this study was to describe the technical details of both techniques that were pioneered in two high volume centers for RAMIE. A prospectively maintained database was used to identify patients with esophageal cancer who underwent RAMIE with intrathoracic anastomosis. The primary outcome was anastomotic leakage, which was analyzed using a moving average curve. For the hand-sewn anastomosis, video recordings were reviewed to evaluate number of sutures and distances between the anastomosis and the longitudinal staple line or gastric conduit tip. Between 2016 and 2019, a total of 68 patients with a hand-sewn anastomosis and 60 patients with a circular-stapled anastomosis were included in the study. For the hand-sewn anastomosis, the moving average curve for anastomotic leakage (including grade 1-3) started at a rate of 40% (cases 1-10) and ended at 10% (cases 59-68). For the circular-stapled anastomosis, the moving average started at 10% (cases 1-10) and ended at 20% (cases 51-60). This study showed the technical details and refinements that were applied in developing two different anastomotic techniques for RAMIE. Results markedly improved during the period of development with specific changes in technique for the hand-sewn anastomosis. The circular-stapled anastomosis showed a more stable rate of performance.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RAMIE; intrathoracic anastomosis; technique

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33241304     DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Treatment recommendations for early esophageal cancer : Endoscopic and surgical options].

Authors:  T Schlosser; A Hoffmeister; J Feisthammel; S Niebisch; R Thieme; I Gockel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Why pay more for robot in esophageal cancer surgery?

Authors:  Fabrizio Rebecchi; Elettra Ugliono; Marco Ettore Allaix; Mario Morino
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-08-11

3.  Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center.

Authors:  E M de Groot; L Goense; B F Kingma; J W van den Berg; J P Ruurda; R van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  [Change of strategy to minimally invasive esophagectomy-Results at a certified center].

Authors:  Felix Merboth; Jasmin Hasanovic; Daniel Stange; Marius Distler; Sandra Kaden; Jürgen Weitz; Thilo Welsch
Journal:  Chirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2021-12-21

5.  Technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  A Peri; N Furbetta; J Viganò; L Pugliese; G Di Franco; F S Latteri; N Mineo; F C Bruno; V Gallo; L Morelli; A Pietrabissa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Double purse-string suture technique for circular-stapled anastomosis during robotic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hanlu Zhang; Zeping Zuo; Xiuji Yan; Fuqiang Wang; Lin Yang; Guanghao Qiu; Long-Qi Chen; Yun Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.