BACKGROUND: Tumor hypoxia has been widely reported to promote metastasis. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying metastasis-associated hypoxia remain unclear. Formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) has been reported to be highly expressed under hypoxic conditions. This study aimed to explore the role of FPR1 in tumor cells under hypoxic conditions. METHODS: The expressions of FPR1 and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) in A549 cells under hypoxic conditions were detected using western blot. The expression of FPR1 in A549 cells under hypoxic conditions was suppressed using the FPR1 antagonist Boc2. Wound-healing and Transwell assays were performed to investigate the migration and invasion of cells. Furthermore, the tumorigenicity of A549 cells was evaluated by constructing a hypoxic mouse model of lung adenocarcinoma. The expression levels of HIF-1α and FPR1 in tumors were measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and western blot. RESULTS: The expression levels of FPR1 and HIF-1α increased in a time-dependent manner after exposure to hypoxic conditions. Wound-healing and Transwell assays showed that hypoxia promoted the migration and invasion abilities of A549 cells, whereas downregulation of FPR1 blocked the effects of hypoxia on A549 cells. Our in vivo results demonstrated that the tumor volumes and weights of mice exposed to hypoxic conditions were significantly higher than those of untreated mice. Furthermore, the downregulation of FPR1 blocked the effects of hypoxia in the mice. Meanwhile, the expressions of HIF-1α and FPR1 at the protein and mRNA levels were increased after hypoxic exposure, whereas FPR1 antagonist Boc2 suppressed the effect of hypoxia on the expression of FPR1. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that FPR1 could be a therapeutic target for suppressing the invasion and tumorigenicity of lung adenocarcinoma cells. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Tumor hypoxia has been widely reported to promote metastasis. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying metastasis-associated hypoxia remain unclear. Formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) has been reported to be highly expressed under hypoxic conditions. This study aimed to explore the role of FPR1 in tumor cells under hypoxic conditions. METHODS: The expressions of FPR1 and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) in A549 cells under hypoxic conditions were detected using western blot. The expression of FPR1 in A549 cells under hypoxic conditions was suppressed using the FPR1 antagonist Boc2. Wound-healing and Transwell assays were performed to investigate the migration and invasion of cells. Furthermore, the tumorigenicity of A549 cells was evaluated by constructing a hypoxic mouse model of lung adenocarcinoma. The expression levels of HIF-1α and FPR1 in tumors were measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and western blot. RESULTS: The expression levels of FPR1 and HIF-1α increased in a time-dependent manner after exposure to hypoxic conditions. Wound-healing and Transwell assays showed that hypoxia promoted the migration and invasion abilities of A549 cells, whereas downregulation of FPR1 blocked the effects of hypoxia on A549 cells. Our in vivo results demonstrated that the tumor volumes and weights of mice exposed to hypoxic conditions were significantly higher than those of untreated mice. Furthermore, the downregulation of FPR1 blocked the effects of hypoxia in the mice. Meanwhile, the expressions of HIF-1α and FPR1 at the protein and mRNA levels were increased after hypoxic exposure, whereas FPR1 antagonist Boc2 suppressed the effect of hypoxia on the expression of FPR1. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that FPR1 could be a therapeutic target for suppressing the invasion and tumorigenicity of lung adenocarcinoma cells. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.
Lung cancer is responsible for more than 1 million deaths annually, making it the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Adenocarcinoma is the most common histological type of lung cancer (1). In China, lung cancer is ranked first for tumor-related morbidity and mortality in men, and second and first for tumor-related morbidity and mortality, respectively, in women. Over the past decade, significant progress has been made in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer, including screening, diagnostic examination, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Biological targeted therapies have significantly improved the prognoses of patients whose tumors harbor somatically activated oncogenes, such as translocated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) (2,3) or mutant epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (EGFR1) (4). However, some lung adenocarcinomas lack an identifiable driver oncogene or harbor mutations in KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene), meaning they are not sensitive to current biological treatments (1). Characterizing the signaling pathways that control cell survival, proliferation, and invasion in different tumors is pivotal to the development of more effective cancer treatments.Hypoxia has been put forward as a decisive marker of the biological behavior of malignant solid tumors. Some experimental studies have demonstrated that tumor hypoxia leads to increased risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis, as well as radiotherapy and chemotherapy resistance (5,6). Investigators recently confirmed that hypoxia induces tumor metastasis, with a strong correlation existing between tumor hypoxia, metastasis, and poor prognosis in cancer patients (7,8).Formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) is a G protein-coupled receptor that was initially identified in phagocytic leukocytes. Subsequent studies found that FFR1 could mediate cell chemotaxis and be activated by N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (9). FFR1 is involved in the pathophysiological processes in tumors, including inflammation (10-13), glioblastoma progression (14,15), migration (16), invasion (17), and tumorigenicity (9,18). Cai et al. showed that hypoxia induced the expression of FPR1 in cancer tissues (19). The involvement of FPR1 in tumorigenesis is seemingly correlated with the specific conditions (specific tumor, stage). For instance, an association has been documented between high expression of FPR1 and poor survival in gastric cancer and advanced disease (20). However, FPR1 has also been reported to inhibit angiogenesis in gastric cancer (21).In the present study, we examined changes in FPR1 expression at the protein and mRNA levels by establishing a tumor hypoxia model in vitro and in vivo. Additionally, we investigated the effects of FPR1 on the growth, migration, and invasion of tumor cells after hypoxic exposure. We found that inhibition of FPR1 activity suppressed the migration and invasion abilities of A549 cells, and also suppressed tumor growth following hypoxia in a nude mice tumor model constructed with stably transfected A549 cells. We present the following article in accordance with the ARRIVE reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5864).
Methods
Cell culture and treatment
A549 cells (Kunming Institute of Zoology, Kunming, China) were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium (Invitrogen, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humid atmosphere containing 5% CO2 and 5–7% O2 (hypoxic conditions) for 0 h (21% O2), 12, 24, or 48 h. After incubation, the expression levels of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) and FPR1 in the cells were detected by western blot. Boc2, an antagonist of FPR1, was supplied by Shanghai Apeptide Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). A549 cells grown to 90% confluence and pretreated with Boc2 (10 mM) for 30 min were subsequently cultured in non-hypoxic (the Boc2 group) or hypoxic (the hypoxia + Boc2 group) conditions for 24 h. Cells cultured for 24 h without Boc2 in a humid atmosphere containing 5% CO2 in non-hypoxic or hypoxic conditions served as the control and hypoxia groups, respectively.
Cell viability
A549 cells were seeded overnight in a 96-well plate at a concentration of 2×104 cells/well, and then treated with or without Boc2 (10 mM) for 30 min. Following that, the cells were cultured in non-hypoxic or hypoxic conditions for 24 h. The cell viability was measured by MTT assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The results were expressed as percentages, with the control group taken as 100%.
Wound-healing assay
To examine cell migration ability, A549 cells were seeded in 6-well plates with RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and grown to 90% confluence. The cells were starved by changing the medium to serum-free RPMI-1640 and then subjected to different treatments for 24 h. The cells were scratched with a 100 µL plastic pipette tip and then washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before treatment. The wound was then photographed using an inverted phase contrast microscope (Nikon; magnification: 10×), and the migration distances were measured 24 hours after treatment.
Cell invasion assay
The invasive capacity of A549 cells after different treatments were detected in 8.0-µm pore size Transwell 24-insert plate chambers. Cells (5×104/well) were seeded in the upper chamber with 200 µL serum-free medium, while complete culture medium with a high concentration of serum was placed in the lower chamber to trap invading cells. After incubation for 24 h, the cells in the upper chamber were removed. The cells that had penetrated the Matrigel-coated membranes and migrated into the lower chamber were stained with crystal violet (0.1%) and photographed. The invasion activity in each sample was quantified by counting the crystal violet-stained cells.
Hypoxic mouse model of lung adenocarcinoma
Nude BALB/C mice (weight, 21–23 g) were supplied by Chongqing Medical University (Chongqing, China). The mice were individually housed in plastic cages (cage size, 20 cm × 15 cm × 15 cm) under a 12-h light–dark cycle. The mice had free access to food and water in their cages, but not during experimental procedures.The mouse hypoxia model was established by subcutaneously injecting the mice with 2×104 A549 cells (500 µL) according to the previous study (22). Briefly, unanesthetized, the mice were placed in 6-liter incubator chambers, where they were exposed to a continuous flow of a humidified gas mixture to induce hypoxia. The mixed gas intervention involved exposure to 5–7% O2 and 95–93% N2, for 2 h once a day, 7 days a week. During the treatments, the flow rate was monitored and maintained at 3–6 liters/min, and the temperature was kept constant at room temperature. During the phases of hypoxia treatment, mice were treated with Boc2 (50 µg/kg, the hypoxia + Boc2 group) or saline (the hypoxia group) once a day. Mice in the Boc2 and control groups were placed in the same chambers and exposed to a continuous mixed flow of humidified room air with saline and Boc2 treatment, respectively. Tumor growth in the mice was observed once a day, and the tumor volumes were measured once every 2 days. After 2 weeks of hypoxia exposure, the mice were sacrificed. Only one tumor was observed in the animals in our study. The maximum diameter of a single tumor was 1.5 cm. This subcutaneous tumor was rapidly dissected 7 days after the injection, and its weight and volume were measured. The volume of the tumor was calculated using the following formula: V= πabc/6 (a, tumor length; b, tumor width; c, tumor height). Pathological changes in the tumor were examined using. All procedures involved in the animal experiments in this study were performed in line with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Wuhan Third Hospital.
Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
Real-time PCR assay was carried out to detect the mRNA expression of HIF-1α and FPR1 in the tumor tissue. The Premix Ex Taq kit (Takara, Japan) and a 7300 real-time PCR system (Life Technologies, USA) were used to perform of real-time PCR, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The thermocycler conditions for PCR were set as follows: 25 °C for 5 min, 42 °C for 60 min, 75 °C for 5 min, and 4 °C for 5 min (23). The mRNA expression levels of HIF-1α and FPR1 were normalized to the endogenous expression of β-actin. The relative mRNA level was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method (24). The real-time PCR primer used was: mouse β-actin F: 5' -CAGTTCGCCATGGATGAC GAT-3', R: 5'-ATCTGGGTCATCTTTTCACGGTTG-3'; mouse HIF-α F: 5'-CCCAT CCATGTGACCATGAGG-3, R:5'-TCAGCACCAAGCACGTCATAGG-3'; mouse FPR1 F: 5'-GCTACTAACTTCTCT CTATTAAAGCAAGCAGGAGACGTGGAAGA AAACCCAGGTCCTATGGAGACAAATTCCTCTCTCCC-3', R: 5' -GCGGAGGCC ACGCGTCTACTTTGCCTGTAACTCCACC-3'.
Western blot
Western blot was performed to evaluate the protein expressions of HIF-1α and FPR1 in A549 cells exposed to a hypoxic atmosphere for different lengths of time (0, 12, 24, and 48 h), as well as in tumor tissues. Cells were washed three times in ice-cold PBS. Cell lysis buffer (R0010, SOLARBIO, Beijing, China) was subsequently added, and the cells were incubated on ice for 1 h for protein extraction. The obtained tumor tissues were homogenized in RIPA lysis buffer (Bioswamp, Wuhan, China) and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min. Protein concentration was measured using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, China) in line with the manufacturer’s instruction. Equal amounts of protein (20 µg) were separated with 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and then transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). The membrane was blocked with 10% skimmed milk (in Tris-buffered saline (TBS), PH 7.2, containing 0.1% Tween-20) for 2 h and incubated at 4 °C overnight with primary antibody (working dilutions of antibodies: HIF-1α (#36169, CST, MA, USA): 1:1,000; FPR1 (ab113531, Abcam, Cambridge, UK): 1:1,000; and β-actin 20536-1-AP, Proteintech, MI, USA): 1:400. Then, the membrane was incubated with peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (1:5,000, sc-20026, KPL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) for 1 h at room temperature and visualized by chemiluminescence (Milipore Corporation, USA). ImageJ software (NIH, USA) was used to perform densitometry analysis.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS 23.0 software (Illinois, USA). Continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student’s t-test was used to compare the data between two groups from the cellular experiments. Comparisons between multiple groups were performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a Bonferroni post-hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to show statistical significance.
Results
Hypoxia induced the expressions of HIF-1α and FPR1 in A549 cells
As the main regulator of gene expression induced by low oxygen levels, HIF-1α is able to respond to a wide range of environmental oxygen concentrations (25). We examined the expressions of HIF-1α and FPR1 in A549 cells after hypoxic exposure for 0, 12, 24, and 48 h. The results showed that the expression of HIF-1α increased in a time-dependent manner (). Similarly, the expression of FPR1 also increased in a time-dependent manner ().
Figure 1
The expression levels of HIF-1α and FPR1 in A549 cells under hypoxic conditions. Hypoxia induced the expression of (A) HIF-1α and (B) FPR1 after treatment for 12, 24, and 48 h. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (**, P<0.01, ***, P<0.001). Data are presented as the means ± SD (n=3). HIF-1α, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α; FPR1, formyl peptide receptor 1; SD, standard deviation.
The expression levels of HIF-1α and FPR1 in A549 cells under hypoxic conditions. Hypoxia induced the expression of (A) HIF-1α and (B) FPR1 after treatment for 12, 24, and 48 h. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (**, P<0.01, ***, P<0.001). Data are presented as the means ± SD (n=3). HIF-1α, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α; FPR1, formyl peptide receptor 1; SD, standard deviation.
Inhibition of FPR1 activity suppressed the migration and invasion abilities of A549 cells under hypoxic conditions
To evaluate the biological effect of FPR1 on the migration and invasion abilities of lung adenocarcinoma cells, Boc2, a specific antagonist of FPR1, was used to inhibit FPR1 activity in A549 cells. A549 cells were pretreated with Boc2 for 30 min, and then exposed to hypoxic conditions for 24 h. As shown in , hypoxia significantly increased the viability of A549 cells, while Boc2 partially inhibited the hypoxia-induced changes. Cells viability in the Boc2 group was similar to that in the control group. Wound-healing assay showed that hypoxia enhanced the migration of A549 cells in the hypoxia group compared with that in the control group, whereas the inhibition of FPR1 activity suppressed wound healing in the hypoxia + Boc2 group compared with in the hypoxia group (). These results indicate that hypoxia promotes tumor cell migration, while the inhibition of FPR1 suppresses the migration of A549 cells induced by hypoxia. The most damaging malignant characteristic of lung adenocarcinoma is the potential for invasion and metastases induced by hypoxia. Here, Transwell assay was conducted to examine whether FPR1 also affects cell invasion. The number of cells in the lower chamber after exposure to hypoxia was significantly greater than that in the control group, whereas the inhibition of FPR1 activity via the administration of Boc2 suppressed the invasion ability of A549 cells (). These results indicated that inhibition of FPR1 activity suppressed the migration and invasion of A549 cells under hypoxic conditions.
Figure 2
The migration and invasion of A549 cells under hypoxic conditions. Inhibition of FPR1 activity suppressed the (A) viability, (B) migration (×100), and (C) invasion of A549 cells induced by hypoxia (×200). Asterisks indicate statistical significance (**, P<0.01, ***, P<0.001). Data are presented as the means ± SD (n=3). FPR1, formyl peptide receptor 1; SD, standard deviation.
The migration and invasion of A549 cells under hypoxic conditions. Inhibition of FPR1 activity suppressed the (A) viability, (B) migration (×100), and (C) invasion of A549 cells induced by hypoxia (×200). Asterisks indicate statistical significance (**, P<0.01, ***, P<0.001). Data are presented as the means ± SD (n=3). FPR1, formyl peptide receptor 1; SD, standard deviation.
Inhibition of FPR1 activity suppressed tumor growth in nude mice under hypoxia
To investigate the effect of FPR1 on the lung adenocarcinoma tumor growth in vivo, A549 cells (2×104) were injected into right forelimbs of 7-week-old nude mice to establish a tumor xenograft model. After the injection, the mice were exposed to hypoxia for 2 h, 7 days a week for 2 weeks; during this period, mice were also treated with Boc2 (50 µg/kg) or saline once a day. The tumor size was first measured at 2 days after the injection. After 14 days of observation, the tumors were removed from the mice, and the tumor volumes and weights were measured. The hypoxia group had larger and heavier tumors than the control group; however, the inhibition of FPR1 activity resulted in a significant reduction in tumor growth in the hypoxia + Boc2 group compared with in the hypoxia group (). shows the pathological changes in the tumors, revealing that the proliferation of tumor cells was significantly increased by hypoxia, but this was attenuated by Boc2. Meanwhile, compared to the control group, the inhibition of FPR1 activity under normoxic conditions had little effect on the proliferation of the tumor cells. These results indicated that inhibition of FPR1 activity not only inhibited the migration and invasion of lung adenocarcinoma cells but also significantly reduced hypoxia-induced tumor growth.
Figure 3
Tumor growth in nude mice under hypoxic condition. Inhibition of FPR1 activity suppressed the hypoxia-induced increase in (A) tumor volume and (B) tumor weight. (C) Inhibition of FPR1 activity suppressed the proliferation of tumor cells. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (***, P<0.001). Data are presented as the mean ± SD (experiments, n=3). Scale bar =100 µm. FPR1, formyl peptide receptor 1; SD, standard deviation.
Tumor growth in nude mice under hypoxic condition. Inhibition of FPR1 activity suppressed the hypoxia-induced increase in (A) tumor volume and (B) tumor weight. (C) Inhibition of FPR1 activity suppressed the proliferation of tumor cells. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (***, P<0.001). Data are presented as the mean ± SD (experiments, n=3). Scale bar =100 µm. FPR1, formyl peptide receptor 1; SD, standard deviation.
Inhibition of FPR1 activity suppressed FPR1 expression in the tumors of nude mice under hypoxic conditions
After the tumor volumes and weights were measured, we further examined the expression levels of HIF-1α and FPR1 in the tumors. As shown in , the expression of HIF-1α and FPR1 at both protein and mRNA level increased after hypoxia treatment, whereas inhibition of FPR1 activity suppressed the effect of hypoxia on the expression of FPR1.
Figure 4
The expression levels of HIF-1α and FPR1 in the tumor tissues of nude mice. The expression levels of (A) HIF-1α and (B) FRP1 mRNA in the tumor tissues. The protein expression levels of (C) HIF-1α and FRP1 (D) in the tumor tissues. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (*, P<0.05, ***, P<0.001). Data are presented as the mean ± SD (experiments, n=3). HIF-1α, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α; FPR1, formyl peptide receptor 1; SD, standard deviation.
The expression levels of HIF-1α and FPR1 in the tumor tissues of nude mice. The expression levels of (A) HIF-1α and (B) FRP1 mRNA in the tumor tissues. The protein expression levels of (C) HIF-1α and FRP1 (D) in the tumor tissues. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (*, P<0.05, ***, P<0.001). Data are presented as the mean ± SD (experiments, n=3). HIF-1α, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α; FPR1, formyl peptide receptor 1; SD, standard deviation.
Discussion
This study investigated the role of FPR1 in the migration and invasion of lung adenocarcinoma cells, as well as in the growth of lung adenocarcinoma tumors under hypoxic conditions. Our results demonstrated that the expression level of FPR1 was increased significantly following hypoxia exposure, while the inhibition of FPR1 activity could suppress the migration and invasion abilities of tumor cells, as well as the growth of hypoxia-induced tumors in a mouse model. These results present FPR1 as a potential biomarker and possible therapeutic target in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma.HIF-1α, which is widely recognized to be a master regulator of the transcriptional response to low oxygen levels, responds to a wide range of environmental oxygen conditions (25). HIF-1α can regulate the expression of more than 100 genes and plays a key role in the body’s physiological and pathological processes. Based on previous studies, we first examined the expression of HIF-1α in A549 cells and mice after hypoxia exposure, which revealed a higher expression of HIF-1α under hypoxic conditions than under normoxic conditions, thus confirming the successful establishment of the hypoxia model in A549 cells and mice (26).A number of studies have suggested that tumor cell migration and invasion are strongly influenced by microenvironmental factors, including a lack of nutrients, changes in oxygen availability, and the composition of the extracellular matrix (27-29). In particular, low oxygen tension, or hypoxia, is associated with metastasis through its stimulation of events leading to angiogenesis and tissue invasion (30), as well as with poor patient prognosis (31). However, the molecular mechanisms underpinning the relationship between hypoxia and metastasis are poorly understood. Hypoxia has been shown to increase the expression of FPR1 (19). Previous studies have reported FPR1 to be involved in the processes of migration, invasion, and tumorigenicity in various tumor cells. For instance, formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine, a specific agonist of FPR1, was found to enhance the migration of BV-2 cells in a dose-dependent manner, whereas Boc2 was observed to inhibit these effects (32). Moreover, FPR1 was reported to enhance the invasiveness of ovarian cancer cells through its interaction with leucine leucine-37 (17). Prevete et al. showed that the activation of FRP1 induced proliferation, migration, and resistance to apoptosis in gastric cancer cells; however, these changes could be reverted by blocking FRP1 (21). Moreover, FPR1 mediates the tumorigenicity of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells and neuroblastoma cells (9,18). Thus, we hypothesize that the regulation of FPR1 activity may affect metastasis and tumor growth induced by hypoxia.This study found that the expression of FPR1 increased in a time-dependent manner in A549 cells after hypoxia exposure, while the inhibition of FPR1 activity suppressed the hypoxia-induced migration and invasion of A549 cells. These findings are consistent with those of the previous study, as mentioned above (9,18,21). The results of our in vivo experiment demonstrate that the volumes and weights of tumors in mice exposed to hypoxia were significantly higher than those of tumors in untreated mice, whereas the inhibition of FPR1 blocked the effects of hypoxia on tumor volumes and weights in mice. Meanwhile, FPR1 expression was increased at both the protein and mRNA levels following hypoxia exposure, while inhibition of FPR1 activity suppressed the effect of hypoxia on the expression of FPR1. Taken together, our results suggest that inhibition of FPR1 activity not only suppresses the migration and invasion of A549 cells, but also suppresses tumor growth.
Conclusions
In summary, we showed that hypoxia induced the expression of FPR1, enhanced tumor cell migration and invasion, and promoted tumor growth. The inhibition of FPR1 suppressed the migration and invasion of tumor cells in vitro and tumor growth in mice in vivo. Therefore, the pharmacological inhibition of FPR1 may be a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma. Further studies are needed to determine whether siRNA targeting of FPR1 has similar effects in the regulation of tumor growth and invasion in lung adenocarcinoma under hypoxic conditions.The article’s supplementary files as
Authors: Jian Huang; Jinyue Hu; Xiuwu Bian; Keqiang Chen; Wanghua Gong; Nancy M Dunlop; O M Zack Howard; Ji Ming Wang Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-06-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Seth B Coffelt; Suzanne L Tomchuck; Kevin J Zwezdaryk; Elizabeth S Danka; Aline B Scandurro Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2009-06-02 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: M Höckel; C Knoop; K Schlenger; B Vorndran; E Baussmann; M Mitze; P G Knapstein; P Vaupel Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 1993-01 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Farrokh Dehdashti; Mark A Mintun; Jason S Lewis; Jeffrey Bradley; Ramaswamy Govindan; Richard Laforest; Michael J Welch; Barry A Siegel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2003-04-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Concetta Ragone; Michele Minopoli; Vincenzo Ingangi; Giovanni Botti; Federica Fratangelo; Antonello Pessi; Maria Patrizia Stoppelli; Paolo Antonio Ascierto; Gennaro Ciliberto; Maria Letizia Motti; Maria Vincenza Carriero Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-12-08