| Literature DB >> 33241014 |
He-Hua Zhang1, Li Yang1, An-Hai Wei1,2, Ao-Wen Duan1, Yong-Ming Li2,3, Ping Zhao4,5, Yong-Qin Li6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A transthoracic impedance (TTI) signal is an important indicator of the quality of chest compressions (CCs) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We proposed an automatic detection algorithm including the wavelet decomposition, fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering, and deep belief network (DBN) to identify the compression and ventilation waveforms for evaluating the quality of CPR.Entities:
Keywords: Transthoracic impedance (TTI); automatic detection; deep belief network (DBN); fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering method; wavelet decomposition
Year: 2020 PMID: 33241014 PMCID: PMC7576062 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-5906
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839
Figure 1The segment examples of TTI signals collected in this experiment. (A) The waveforms of a standard signal; (B) an abnormal signal; (C) a signal affected by noise and baseline drift. TTI, transthoracic impedance.
Figure 2Detailed wavelet coefficients. (A) The 1st level; (B) the 2nd level; (C) the 3rd level; (D) the 4th level; (E) the 5th level; (F) the 6th level; (G) the 7th level; (H): the 8th level; (I) the 9th level.
Figure 3Feature curve of discrete wavelet transform Dw; the ratio of the original waveform’s amplitude to the energy of the 5th wavelet coefficient.
Figure 4Flow chart of automatic detection algorithm of TTI signals. This algorithm is conducted with preprocessing, waveform marking, wavelet decomposition and other steps. TTI, transthoracic impedance.
Figure 5Classification results of original data. (A) An abnormal signal (original data: ); (B) a signal affected by noise and baseline drift (original data: ). The circles and stars represent the peaks and troughs of compression waveforms, respectively. The triangles and squares represent the peaks and troughs of ventilation waveforms, respectively. TTI, transthoracic impedance.
Results of classification and identification
| Symbol TTI signal detection methods | Compression | Ventilation | Time (s) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPV (%) | Sensitivity (%) | PPV (%) | Sensitivity (%) | |||
| Adaptive threshold | 97.7 | 97.2 | 81.0 | 92.2 | – | |
| Neural network | – | – | 94.8 | 88.7 | – | |
| LDA | 97.7 | 96.1 | 95.1 | 96.1 | – | |
| Proposed FCM method | 99.7 | 99.8 | 95.7 | 95.1 | 0.3797 | |
| Proposed DBN method | 99.8 | 99.7 | 96.1 | 97.7 | 0.0886 | |
TTI, transthoracic impedance; PPV, positive predictive value; LDA, linear discriminant analysis; FCM, fuzzy c-means; DBN, deep brief network.