Snehit Mhatre1, Jason M Wood1, Aleksandra Checinska Sielaff1, Maximilian Mora2, Stefanie Duller2, Nitin Kumar Singh1, Fathi Karouia3,4, Christine Moissl-Eichinger2,5, Kasthuri Venkateswaran1. 1. Biotechnology and Planetary Protection Group, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. 3. Space Bioscience Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States. 4. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States. 5. BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With increasing numbers of interplanetary missions, there is a need to establish robust protocols to ensure the protection of extraterrestrial planets being visited from contamination by terrestrial life forms. The current study is the first report comparing the commercial resupply vehicle (CRV) microbiome with the International Space Station (ISS) microbiome to understand the risks of contamination, thus serving as a model system for future planetary missions. RESULTS: Samples obtained from the internal surfaces and ground support equipment of three CRV missions were subjected to various molecular techniques for microbial diversity analysis. In total, 25 samples were collected with eight defined locations from each CRV mission prior to launch. In general, the internal surfaces of vehicles were clean, with an order of magnitude fewer microbes compared to ground support equipment. The first CRV mission had a larger microbial population than subsequent CRV missions, which were clean as compared to the initial CRV locations sampled. Cultivation assays showed the presence of Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes and members of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. As expected, shotgun metagenome analyses revealed the presence of more microbial taxa compared to cultivation-based assays. The internal locations of the CRV microbiome reportedly showed the presence of microorganisms capable of tolerating ultraviolet radiation (e.g., Bacillus firmus) and clustered separately from the ISS microbiome. CONCLUSIONS: The metagenome sequence comparison of the CRV microbiome with the ISS microbiome revealed significant differences showing that CRV microbiomes were a negligible part of the ISS environmental microbiome. These findings suggest that the maintenance protocols in cleaning CRV surfaces are highly effective in controlling the contaminating microbial population during cargo transfer to the ISS via the CRV route.
BACKGROUND: With increasing numbers of interplanetary missions, there is a need to establish robust protocols to ensure the protection of extraterrestrial planets being visited from contamination by terrestrial life forms. The current study is the first report comparing the commercial resupply vehicle (CRV) microbiome with the International Space Station (ISS) microbiome to understand the risks of contamination, thus serving as a model system for future planetary missions. RESULTS: Samples obtained from the internal surfaces and ground support equipment of three CRV missions were subjected to various molecular techniques for microbial diversity analysis. In total, 25 samples were collected with eight defined locations from each CRV mission prior to launch. In general, the internal surfaces of vehicles were clean, with an order of magnitude fewer microbes compared to ground support equipment. The first CRV mission had a larger microbial population than subsequent CRV missions, which were clean as compared to the initial CRV locations sampled. Cultivation assays showed the presence of Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes and members of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. As expected, shotgun metagenome analyses revealed the presence of more microbial taxa compared to cultivation-based assays. The internal locations of the CRV microbiome reportedly showed the presence of microorganisms capable of tolerating ultraviolet radiation (e.g., Bacillus firmus) and clustered separately from the ISS microbiome. CONCLUSIONS: The metagenome sequence comparison of the CRV microbiome with the ISS microbiome revealed significant differences showing that CRV microbiomes were a negligible part of the ISS environmental microbiome. These findings suggest that the maintenance protocols in cleaning CRV surfaces are highly effective in controlling the contaminating microbial population during cargo transfer to the ISS via the CRV route.
Authors: Ross Overbeek; Tadhg Begley; Ralph M Butler; Jomuna V Choudhuri; Han-Yu Chuang; Matthew Cohoon; Valérie de Crécy-Lagard; Naryttza Diaz; Terry Disz; Robert Edwards; Michael Fonstein; Ed D Frank; Svetlana Gerdes; Elizabeth M Glass; Alexander Goesmann; Andrew Hanson; Dirk Iwata-Reuyl; Roy Jensen; Neema Jamshidi; Lutz Krause; Michael Kubal; Niels Larsen; Burkhard Linke; Alice C McHardy; Folker Meyer; Heiko Neuweger; Gary Olsen; Robert Olson; Andrei Osterman; Vasiliy Portnoy; Gordon D Pusch; Dmitry A Rodionov; Christian Rückert; Jason Steiner; Rick Stevens; Ines Thiele; Olga Vassieva; Yuzhen Ye; Olga Zagnitko; Veronika Vonstein Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2005-10-07 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Aleksandra Checinska Sielaff; Camilla Urbaniak; Ganesh Babu Malli Mohan; Victor G Stepanov; Quyen Tran; Jason M Wood; Jeremiah Minich; Daniel McDonald; Teresa Mayer; Rob Knight; Fathi Karouia; George E Fox; Kasthuri Venkateswaran Journal: Microbiome Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Aleksandra Checinska; Alexander J Probst; Parag Vaishampayan; James R White; Deepika Kumar; Victor G Stepanov; George E Fox; Henrik R Nilsson; Duane L Pierson; Jay Perry; Kasthuri Venkateswaran Journal: Microbiome Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 14.650