Literature DB >> 33239936

Kinematic Comparisons of the Shakehand and Penhold Grips in Table Tennis Forehand and Backhand Strokes when Returning Topspin and Backspin Balls.

Rui Xia1, Boyi Dai2, Weijie Fu3, Nan Gu4, Yigang Wu5.   

Abstract

Identifying the factors associated with table tennis performance may provide training information for competitive athletes and guide the general population for active participation. The purpose was to compare the joint, racket, and ball kinematics between the shakehand and penhold grips in table tennis forehand and backhand strokes when returning topspin and backspin balls in advanced male players. Nine penhold-grip players and 18 matched shakehand-grip players performed forehand and backhand strokes when returning topspin and backspin balls using their habitual grip styles, while the kinematics of the trunk, upper extremities, racket, and ball were collected. Racket angles were calculated as the relative motion of the racket to the forearm. For the forehand strokes, no significant differences were observed for ball or racket velocities between the two grips. The shakehand grip tended to demonstrate greater shoulder external rotation angles compared to the penhold grip. The shakehand grip resulted in racket flexion angular velocity compared to racket extension velocity for the penhold grip. For the backhand strokes, greater ball and racket velocities were observed for the shakehand grip. The shakehand grip generally demonstrated decreased final trunk left rotation angles, increased trunk right rotation angular velocities, decreased final shoulder abduction angles, increased shoulder adduction angular velocities, and increased forearm supination angular velocities. The two grips demonstrated similar peak racket and ball velocities but different shoulder rotation range of motion and racket motion in forehand strokes. The penhold grips resulted in decreased peak racket and ball velocities in backhand strokes, likely due to its decreased shoulder, elbow, and forearm motion and less aligned longitudinal axes between the racket and forearm. These findings may help understand the dominance of the shakehand grip over the penhold grip in elite athletes and provide information for grip selection, technique improvements, and exercise training. © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ping-pong; biomechanics; motion; performance; techniques

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33239936      PMCID: PMC7675628     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  12 in total

1.  Kinetics of the upper limb during table tennis topspin forehands in advanced and intermediate players.

Authors:  Yoichi Iino; Takeji Kojima
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.832

2.  The kinematics of table tennis racquet: differences between topspin strokes.

Authors:  Ziemowit Bańkosz; Sławomir Winiarski
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 1.637

3.  Kinematics of table tennis topspin forehands: effects of performance level and ball spin.

Authors:  Yoichi Iino; Takeji Kojima
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  Effect of the racket mass and the rate of strokes on kinematics and kinetics in the table tennis topspin backhand.

Authors:  Yoichi Iino; Takeji Kojima
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.337

5.  Effects of performance level on lower limb kinematics during table tennis forehand loop.

Authors:  Jieyuan Qian; Yan Zhang; Julien S Baker; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Acta Bioeng Biomech       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.073

6.  Mechanical energy generation and transfer in the racket arm during table tennis topspin backhands.

Authors:  Yoichi Iino; Takeji Kojima
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.832

7.  The Evaluation of Changes of Angles in Selected Joints During Topspin Forehand in Table Tennis.

Authors:  Ziemowit Bańkosz; Sławomir Winiarski
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 1.422

8.  Hip joint kinetics in the table tennis topspin forehand: relationship to racket velocity.

Authors:  Yoichi Iino
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.337

9.  Correlations between Angular Velocities in Selected Joints and Velocity of Table Tennis Racket during Topspin Forehand and Backhand.

Authors:  Ziemowit Bańkosz; Sławomir Winiarski
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.988

10.  Eye on the Ball: Table Tennis as a Pro-Health Form of Leisure-Time Physical Activity.

Authors:  Elżbieta Biernat; Sonia Buchholtz; Justyna Krzepota
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  4 in total

1.  Biomechanical Comparison between Down-the-Line and Cross-Court Topspin Backhand in Competitive Table Tennis.

Authors:  Kaige Xing; Lanping Hang; Zijun Lu; Chuangui Mao; Dong Kang; Chen Yang; Yuliang Sun
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Measuring Upper Limb Kinematics of Forehand and Backhand Topspin Drives with IMU Sensors in Wheelchair and Able-Bodied Table Tennis Players.

Authors:  Jia-Wen Yam; Jing-Wen Pan; Pui-Wah Kong
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Shoulder biomechanics of para-table tennis: a case study of a standing class para-athlete with severe leg impairment.

Authors:  Pui Wah Kong; Jia Wen Yam
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-24

4.  Biomechanical Analysis of Touch Ball Movements in Tennis Forehand Strokes.

Authors:  Wufeng Luo
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.