Literature DB >> 33238882

Correction to: Optimality criteria for futility stopping boundaries for group sequential designs with a continuous endpoint.

Xieran Li1, Carolin Herrmann1,2, Geraldine Rauch3,4.   

Abstract

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Year:  2020        PMID: 33238882      PMCID: PMC7687821          DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01161-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol        ISSN: 1471-2288            Impact factor:   4.615


Correction to: BMC Med Res Methodol 20, 274 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01141-5 Following publication of the article [1], it was noted that due to a typesetting error the old version of Fig. 1 is displayed with the correct version of Fig. 1, and it should be deleted.
Fig. 1

The “optimal” futility boundary α0,opt as a function of the admissible parameters Pow and π for N = 140 (blue dots) and n = 188 (red squares). The black symbols highlight the “optimal” futility boundaries for Powloss = 0.05 and πwrong = 0.05

The correct Fig. 1 and caption have been included in this correction, and the original article has been corrected. The “optimal” futility boundary α0,opt as a function of the admissible parameters Pow and π for N = 140 (blue dots) and n = 188 (red squares). The black symbols highlight the “optimal” futility boundaries for Powloss = 0.05 and πwrong = 0.05
  1 in total

1.  Optimality criteria for futility stopping boundaries for group sequential designs with a continuous endpoint.

Authors:  Xieran Li; Carolin Herrmann; Geraldine Rauch
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.615

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.