Literature DB >> 33237843

How Implicit Bias Contributes to Racial Disparities in Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in the United States.

Bani Saluja1, Zenobia Bryant2.   

Abstract

Over the past two decades, maternal mortality rates have declined around the world. In the United States, however, 700 women die each year as a result of pregnancy or delivery complications. This represents a 50% increase in the U.S. maternal mortality rate over the same time period. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the pregnancy-related mortality ratios vary significantly by race, with White women experiencing 13.0 deaths per 100,000 births, compared with 42.8 deaths per 100,000 births for Black women, from 2011 to 2015. Multiple studies suggest that implicit bias-defined as the attitudes or stereotypes that affect our understanding, actions, and decisions in an unconscious manner-is most likely a contributing factor to this alarming racial health disparity. The failure to recognize the pain of African American patients, regardless of whether it is conscious or unconscious, has the potential to affect the way obstetrician/gynecologists counsel patients about treatment options when it comes to chronic conditions, contraception, vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, and the management of fibroids. In this article, we will review implicit bias and the impact it can have on health care and health disparities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implicit bias; maternal morbidity; maternal mortality; racism

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33237843     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  7 in total

1.  Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Cesarean Birth and Maternal Morbidity in a Low-Risk, Nulliparous Cohort.

Authors:  Michelle P Debbink; Lynda G Ugwu; William A Grobman; Uma M Reddy; Alan T N Tita; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Ronald J Wapner; Dwight J Rouse; George R Saade; John M Thorp; Suneet P Chauhan; Maged M Costantine; Edward K Chien; Brian M Casey; Sindhu K Srinivas; Geeta K Swamy; Hyagriv N Simhan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Planning, implementing, and evaluating an online group-model-building workshop during the COVID-19 pandemic: celebrating successes and learning from shortcomings.

Authors:  Kyrah K Brown; Michael Kenneth Lemke; Saeideh Fallah-Fini; Ariel Hall; Mercy Obasanya
Journal:  Syst Dyn Rev       Date:  2022-03-22

3.  Prenatal substance exposure and maternal hostility from pregnancy to toddlerhood: Associations with temperament profiles at 16 months of age.

Authors:  Brendan D Ostlund; Koraly E Pérez-Edgar; Shannon Shisler; Sarah Terrell; Stephanie Godleski; Pamela Schuetze; Rina D Eiden
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2021-10-15

4.  Association Between Provider-Patient Racial Concordance and the Maternal Health Experience During Pregnancy.

Authors:  Adaora Okpa; Miatta Buxton; Marie O'Neill
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-02-08

Review 5.  Shared Decision-Making: The Way Forward for Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling.

Authors:  Brooke W Bullington; Asha Sata; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2022-08-25

6.  Summary and Conclusion: Framing a New Research Agenda on Maternal Morbidities and Mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Michael C Lu; Samia Noursi
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  News media representations of women who kill their newly born children.

Authors:  B Eisenwort; P Fernandez Arias; C M Klier; B Till
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 3.633

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.