Literature DB >> 33236973

Priority-setting to integrate sexual and reproductive health into universal health coverage: the case of Malaysia.

Shiang Cheng Lim1, Yee Chern Yap2, Sima Barmania3, Veloshnee Govender4, Georges Danhoundo4, Michelle Remme5.   

Abstract

Despite increasing calls to integrate and prioritise sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in universal health coverage (UHC) processes, several SRH services have remained a low priority in countries' UHC plans. This study aims to understand the priority-setting process of SRH interventions in the context of UHC, drawing on the Malaysian experience. A realist evaluation framework was adopted to examine the priority-setting process for three SRH tracer interventions: pregnancy, safe delivery and post-natal care; gender-based violence (GBV) services; and abortion-related services. The study used a qualitative multi-method design, including a literature and document review, and 20 in-depth key informant interviews, to explore the context-mechanism-outcome configurations that influenced and explained the priority-setting process. Four key advocacy strategies were identified for the effective prioritisation of SRH services, namely: (1) generating public demand and social support, (2) linking SRH issues with public agendas or international commitments, (3) engaging champions that are internal and external to the public health sector, and (4) reframing SRH issues as public health issues. While these strategies successfully triggered mechanisms, such as mutual understanding and increased buy-in of policymakers to prioritise SRH services, the level and extent of prioritisation was affected by both inner and outer contextual factors, in particular the socio-cultural and political context. Priority-setting is a political decision-making process that reflects societal values and norms. Efforts to integrate SRH services in UHC processes need both to make technical arguments and to find strategies to overcome barriers related to societal values (including certain socio-cultural and religious norms). This is particularly important for sensitive SRH services, like GBV and safe abortion, and for certain populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abortion; context–mechanism–outcome; gender-based violence (GBV); pregnancy; priority-setting; safe delivery and post-natal care; sexual and reproductive health; universal health coverage

Year:  2020        PMID: 33236973      PMCID: PMC7887985          DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1842153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters        ISSN: 2641-0397


  22 in total

Review 1.  Migrant workers in Sabah, East Malaysia: The importance of legislation and policy to uphold equity on sexual and reproductive health and rights.

Authors:  Helen Benedict Lasimbang; Wen Ting Tong; Wah Yun Low
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 5.237

Review 2.  Setting Healthcare Priorities at the Macro and Meso Levels: A Framework for Evaluation.

Authors:  Edwine W Barasa; Sassy Molyneux; Mike English; Susan Cleary
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-09-16

Review 3.  Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  G Doumit; M Gattellari; J Grimshaw; M A O'Brien
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

4.  Improving Health Care Coverage, Equity, And Financial Protection Through A Hybrid System: Malaysia's Experience.

Authors:  Ravindra P Rannan-Eliya; Chamara Anuranga; Adilius Manual; Sondi Sararaks; Anis S Jailani; Abdul J Hamid; Izzanie M Razif; Ee H Tan; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Generating demand and community support for sexual and reproductive health services for young people: A review of the Literature and Programs.

Authors:  Amy J Kesterton; Meena Cabral de Mello
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of syphilis and HIV in China: What drives political prioritization and what can this tell us about promoting dual elimination?

Authors:  Dadong Wu; Sarah Hawkes; Kent Buse
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 7.  Framing and the health policy process: a scoping review.

Authors:  Adam D Koon; Benjamin Hawkins; Susannah H Mayhew
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.344

8.  Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework.

Authors:  Joanna C Moullin; Kelsey S Dickson; Nicole A Stadnick; Borsika Rabin; Gregory A Aarons
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Achieving high uptake of human papillomavirus vaccination in Malaysia through school-based vaccination programme.

Authors:  Nor Asiah Muhamad; Saidatul Norbaya Buang; Safurah Jaafar; Rohani Jais; Phaik Sim Tan; Normi Mustapha; Noor Aliza Lodz; Tahir Aris; Lokman Hakim Sulaiman; Shahnaz Murad
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Sexual and reproductive health services in universal health coverage: a review of recent evidence from low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  T K Sundari Ravindran; Veloshnee Govender
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2020-12
View more
  3 in total

1.  Reproductive health practices and use of health services among immigrant Indonesian women working in Malaysia.

Authors:  Rosnah Sutan; Pinta Pudiyanti Siregar
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  "Imagining the world anew": a transformative, rights-based agenda for UHC and SRHR in 2021 and beyond.

Authors:  Anna Gruending; Pete Chapman; Veloshnee Govender
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2020-05

3.  The legal implications of prenatal diagnosis in Malaysia.

Authors:  Chee Ying Kuek
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-11-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.