Literature DB >> 33236381

To stage or not to stage: determining the true clinical significance of the biopsy tract through perinephric fat in assessing renal cell carcinoma.

Aida Valencia-Guerrero1,2, Esther Oliva1,2, Chin-Lee Wu1,2, Shulin Wu1, Travis Rice-Stitt1,2, Peter M Sadow1,2, Douglas M Dahl2,3, Adam S Feldman2,3, Ronald S Arellano2,4, Kristine M Cornejo1,2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Perinephric fat invasion (PFI) is a key component of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) staging, but there are limited data pertaining to biopsy tract seeding (BTS) resulting in perirenal tissue involvement [BTS with perinephric fat invasion (BTS-P)].The aim is to correlate clinical outcomes with pathologic stage to determine whether the presence of BTS-P should be considered a criterion to stage RCC as part of the pT3a category in the absence of any other upstaging variables. MATERIALS AND
RESULTS: We identified 304 renal biopsies from patients with subsequent nephrectomies for RCC; 33 of the tumours contained PFI. Each case was reviewed to determine the presence of BTS-P and other forms of invasion [e.g. non-BTS-P PFI, sinus fat invasion (SFI), and/or renal vein invasion (RVI)], and these findings were compared with survival outcomes. Ten (30%) of 33 tumours with PFI showed BTS-P as the only finding, and were otherwise pT1 tumours; six (60%) patients were alive without disease (AWOD) (mean, 77.5 months), three were lost to follow-up (LTF), and one died of other disease (DOOD). Two patients showed true PFI plus BTS-P; one was LTF and one is AWOD at 107 months. Ten (43%) of 23 patients with tumours with true invasion (PFI ± SFI and/or RVI) are AWOD (mean, 97.7 months), eight (35%) died of disease (DOD), four were LTF, and one DOOD. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the cancer-specific survival was significantly worse in patients with true invasion (P = 0.044) than in those with BTS-P as the sole finding.
CONCLUSION: Patients with tumours showing BTS-P only appear to have better outcomes than those with other non-PFI invasion, suggesting that this finding should not be upstaged to pT3a. Additional studies are needed to corroborate the significance of our observations.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopsy tract seeding; perinephric fat invasion; renal cell carcinoma; staging; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33236381      PMCID: PMC9353618          DOI: 10.1111/his.14309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   7.778


  23 in total

1.  Renal mass biopsy: "just do it".

Authors:  Michael Ordon; Jaime Landman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Renal Tumor Biopsy for Small Renal Masses: A Single-center 13-year Experience.

Authors:  Patrick O Richard; Michael A S Jewett; Jaimin R Bhatt; John R Kachura; Andrew J Evans; Alexandre R Zlotta; Thomas Hermanns; Tristan Juvet; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Tumour seeding of the renal tumour biopsy tract - a histologically under-recognised feature?

Authors:  Philip S Macklin; Clare L Verrill; Ian S D Roberts; Richard Colling; Mark E Sullivan; Guy M Webster; David W Cranston; Charles R Tapping; Lisa Browning
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 4.  Renal cell carcinoma staging: pitfalls, challenges, and updates.

Authors:  Sean R Williamson; Kanika Taneja; Liang Cheng
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Safety, reliability and accuracy of small renal tumour biopsies: results from a multi-institution registry.

Authors:  Patrick O Richard; Michael A S Jewett; Simon Tanguay; Olli Saarela; Zhihui Amy Liu; Frédéric Pouliot; Anil Kapoor; Ricardo Rendon; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Renal cell carcinoma seeding of a percutaneous biopsy tract.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Mullins; Ronald Rodriguez
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size.

Authors:  Igor Frank; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Amy L Weaver; Horst Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Needle tract seeding following percutaneous biopsy of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Dwayne T S Chang; Hariom Sur; Mikhail Lozinskiy; David M A Wallace
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-09-02

9.  A single-centre experience with tumour tract seeding associated with needle manipulation of renal cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Aravind Viswanathan; Johann P Ingimarsson; John D Seigne; Alan R Schned
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  The Difference in Prognosis between Renal Sinus Fat and Perinephric Fat Invasion for pT3a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhiling Zhang; Chunping Yu; Liliya Velet; Yonghong Li; Lijuan Jiang; Fangjian Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.