Literature DB >> 33235915

Cytoplasmic MYC is an anti-necroptotic protein.

Eun-Woo Lee1, Daehyeon Seong2, Jaewhan Song2.   

Abstract

Cancer cells are often resistant to necroptosis as well as apotosis, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. We recently revealed an important crosstalk between MYC, a potent oncogene, and receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3), a pivotal factor in inducing necroptosis. Mechanistically, cytoplasmic MYC directly binds to RIPK3, inhibiting initial necrosome complex formation.
© 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MYC; RIPK1; RIPK3; TNF; necroptosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33235915      PMCID: PMC7671064          DOI: 10.1080/23723556.2020.1817697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol        ISSN: 2372-3556


Resisting cell death is a hallmark of cancer. While the mechanism by which cancer cells escape apoptosis is well-understood, little is known about how necroptosis is controlled by oncogenic signals in cancer cells.[1] Many types of cancer cells have protective mechanisms against necroptotic processes by developing systems that can negatively regulate factors involved in necroptosis such as receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3), possibly at the epigenetic, posttranscriptional, and posttranslational levels. These observations implicitly indicate that anti-necroptotic processes are selected in the evolution of cancer formation and offer the possibility of employing necroptosis to suppress tumorigenesis. However, unlike the targeting of apoptotic processes, targeting of the necroptotic process to stall cancer development has been tightly restricted by the lack of a comprehensive understanding of the crosstalk between the various tumor-promoting pathways and necroptosis, which paradoxically provides an uncharted field for exploration. We recently reported important and exciting findings of crosstalk and a regulatory pathway that exists between MYC, a potent oncogene, and RIPK3, a pivotal factor in inducing necroptosis.[2] Necroptosis is a type of programmed necrotic cell death necrosis, which is activated by various inflammatory stimuli and DNA damage.[3] RIPK3 is a key protein in necroptosis execution, forming a complex with RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM)-containing proteins such as RIPK1.[4] Activated RIPK3 directly phosphorylates mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL), which eventually destroys cellular membranes.[4] Of note, necroptosis is a mechanism that not only kills cells but also induces inflammation by releasing damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) such as High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1), interleukin-1α (IL-1α), ATP, and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) out of the cells, thereby boosting the inflammatory response of neighboring cells.[5] Therefore, necroptosis is regarded as immunogenic cell death (ICD), which is implicated in various inflammatory diseases and anti-cancer immunity.[6] Several studies have supported that cells dying by necroptosis strongly activate anti-cancer immunity.[7] Interestingly, cells dying by necroptosis undergo transcriptomic reprogramming to maximize the inflammatory response, as has been observed by our group and other researchers.[2] In contrast, we found MYC/MAX and E2F Transcription Factor 1 (E2F1) target genes are significantly downregulated in necroptotic cells, suggesting that oncogenic signaling pathways might be negative regulators of necroptosis. Indeed, MYC functions as a negative regulator of RIPK3 and prevents RIPK3-RIPK1 complex formation, leading to necroptosis suppression. The mechanism by which MYC suppresses necroptosis is quite unexpected because no transcriptional activity is required although MYC is a well-known transcription factor.[8] In addition, cytoplasmic MYC is sufficient to suppress necroptosis. A direct interaction and colocalization between MYC and RIPK3 plausibly takes place in the cytoplasm under normal conditions. This process seems to restrict RIPK3 from binding to RIPK1 and facilitates lysosomal degradation of RIPK1 and RIPK3 by STIP1 homology and U-Box containing protein 1 (STUB1), also known as carboxyl terminus of Hsp70-interacting protein (CHIP) (Figure 1). Interestingly, we observed a small complex consisting of RIPK3 and RIPK1 in MYC-depleted cells in the absence of necroptotic stimuli (Figure 1), supporting that the primary function of MYC is to prevent the spontaneous formation of RIPK1 and RIPK3. As a result, MYC ameliorates full necrosome formation and necroptotic cell death upon necroptotic stimuli. Given that RIPK3 is also localized in the nucleus upon necroptotic stimuli,[9] RIPK3 might interact with MYC in the nucleus. This interaction seems very transient because the nuclear colocalization between RIPK3 and MYC is only observed when nuclear export is inhibited. These data indicate that nuclear MYC might also contribute to necroptosis suppression.
Figure 1.

Mechanism by which MYC suppresses RIPK3-dependent necroptosis. Under normal conditions, cytoplasmic MYC directly binds to receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3), preventing RIPK1-RIPK3 complex formation. Free RIPK1 and RIPK3 undergo lysosomal degradation through ubiquitination by STIP1 homology and U-Box containing protein 1 (STUB1), also known as carboxyl terminus of Hsp70-interacting protein (CHIP). Upon necroptotic stimuli, RIPK1 and RIPK3 are phosphorylated and stabilized, leading to necroptosis. Meanwhile, RIPK3 induces proteasomal degradation of MYC, possibly by phosphorylating an unknown factor. When MYC is overexpressed, MYC suppresses initial RIPK1-RIPK3 complex formation, thereby inhibiting necroptosis. In contrast, when MYC levels are low, RIPK1 and RIPK3 spontaneously form a small complex in the absence of necroptotic stimuli, leading to its stabilization. Upon stimulation, the RIPK1-RIPK3 small complex contributes to the rapid formation of a large and insoluble necrosome complex, resulting in massive necroptotic cell death

Mechanism by which MYC suppresses RIPK3-dependent necroptosis. Under normal conditions, cytoplasmic MYC directly binds to receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3), preventing RIPK1-RIPK3 complex formation. Free RIPK1 and RIPK3 undergo lysosomal degradation through ubiquitination by STIP1 homology and U-Box containing protein 1 (STUB1), also known as carboxyl terminus of Hsp70-interacting protein (CHIP). Upon necroptotic stimuli, RIPK1 and RIPK3 are phosphorylated and stabilized, leading to necroptosis. Meanwhile, RIPK3 induces proteasomal degradation of MYC, possibly by phosphorylating an unknown factor. When MYC is overexpressed, MYC suppresses initial RIPK1-RIPK3 complex formation, thereby inhibiting necroptosis. In contrast, when MYC levels are low, RIPK1 and RIPK3 spontaneously form a small complex in the absence of necroptotic stimuli, leading to its stabilization. Upon stimulation, the RIPK1-RIPK3 small complex contributes to the rapid formation of a large and insoluble necrosome complex, resulting in massive necroptotic cell death The importance of MYC in preventing necroptosis becomes quite evident in the RIPK3 negative regulatory pathway, which upon activation by necroptotic stimulation, induces MYC degradation. Although RIPK3 kinase activity is required for MYC degradation and RIPK3 is able to phosphorylate MYC in vitro, MYC phosphorylation by RIPK3 is not necessary for MYC degradation. Rather, we suggest the presence of other factors that are phosphorylated by RIPK3 for the degradation of MYC (Figure 1). In addition, we observed that the expression of MYC target genes is rapidly downregulated within 4 h of necroptotic stimuli, while MYC protein is degraded complete by 5 h. This observation suggests that nuclear RIPK3 might inhibit the transcriptional activities of MYC via direct binding or indirect phosphorylation of other proteins before inducing MYC degradation. Furthermore, MYC degradation might not be able to promote necroptosis because RIPK3 is already activated before MYC is degraded. Given that MYC also plays a suppressive role in inflammation.[7,10] early inhibition of MYC activity as well as MYC degradation can contribute to necroptosis-driven inflammatory responses. Finally, we proposed the possibility that MYC suppression can stimulate necroptosis to induce cancer cell death in acute myeloid leukemia, which is characterized by overexpression of MYC as a positive selection factor for survival. We expect that this regulatory circuit of MYC and RIPK3 will provide a novel concept and perspective that is relevant for how necroptosis is regulated by a variety of oncogenic pathways. Although transcription factors such as MYC are regarded as undruggable targets, MYC is still an attractive target for cancer therapies in many ways. Beyond its classical roles in cell proliferation, MYC is regarded as the central factor for cancer metabolism, rendering cancer cells to survive under hypoxic and metabolic stress.[8] Recently, MYC was shown to directly transactivate CD47 (cluster of differentiation 47) and PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1), which abolish anti-tumor immunity.[10] Given that immunogenic cell death such as necroptosis strongly contributes to anti-tumor immunity, necroptosis suppression by MYC is thought to not only prevent cancer cells from dying but also to inhibitor anti-cancer immunity. New technology including proteolysis-targeting chimaera (PROTAC) might be used to develop promising MYC-targeting drugs.
  9 in total

1.  Catch me if you can: targeting the mitochondrial permeability transition pore in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A Linkermann; K Konstantinidis; R N Kitsis
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 15.828

2.  Intratumoral activation of the necroptotic pathway components RIPK1 and RIPK3 potentiates antitumor immunity.

Authors:  Annelise G Snyder; Nicholas W Hubbard; Michelle N Messmer; Sigal B Kofman; Cassidy E Hagan; Susana L Orozco; Kristy Chiang; Brian P Daniels; David Baker; Andrew Oberst
Journal:  Sci Immunol       Date:  2019-06-21

3.  MYC regulates the antitumor immune response through CD47 and PD-L1.

Authors:  Stephanie C Casey; Ling Tong; Yulin Li; Rachel Do; Susanne Walz; Kelly N Fitzgerald; Arvin M Gouw; Virginie Baylot; Ines Gütgemann; Martin Eilers; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  The diverse role of RIP kinases in necroptosis and inflammation.

Authors:  John Silke; James A Rickard; Motti Gerlic
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 5.  MYC, Metabolism, and Cancer.

Authors:  Zachary E Stine; Zandra E Walton; Brian J Altman; Annie L Hsieh; Chi V Dang
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 6.  The roles of ubiquitination in extrinsic cell death pathways and its implications for therapeutics.

Authors:  Jinho Seo; Min Wook Kim; Kwang-Hee Bae; Sang Chul Lee; Jaewhan Song; Eun-Woo Lee
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 7.  Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galluzzi; Ilio Vitale; Stuart A Aaronson; John M Abrams; Dieter Adam; Patrizia Agostinis; Emad S Alnemri; Lucia Altucci; Ivano Amelio; David W Andrews; Margherita Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli; Alexey V Antonov; Eli Arama; Eric H Baehrecke; Nickolai A Barlev; Nicolas G Bazan; Francesca Bernassola; Mathieu J M Bertrand; Katiuscia Bianchi; Mikhail V Blagosklonny; Klas Blomgren; Christoph Borner; Patricia Boya; Catherine Brenner; Michelangelo Campanella; Eleonora Candi; Didac Carmona-Gutierrez; Francesco Cecconi; Francis K-M Chan; Navdeep S Chandel; Emily H Cheng; Jerry E Chipuk; John A Cidlowski; Aaron Ciechanover; Gerald M Cohen; Marcus Conrad; Juan R Cubillos-Ruiz; Peter E Czabotar; Vincenzo D'Angiolella; Ted M Dawson; Valina L Dawson; Vincenzo De Laurenzi; Ruggero De Maria; Klaus-Michael Debatin; Ralph J DeBerardinis; Mohanish Deshmukh; Nicola Di Daniele; Francesco Di Virgilio; Vishva M Dixit; Scott J Dixon; Colin S Duckett; Brian D Dynlacht; Wafik S El-Deiry; John W Elrod; Gian Maria Fimia; Simone Fulda; Ana J García-Sáez; Abhishek D Garg; Carmen Garrido; Evripidis Gavathiotis; Pierre Golstein; Eyal Gottlieb; Douglas R Green; Lloyd A Greene; Hinrich Gronemeyer; Atan Gross; Gyorgy Hajnoczky; J Marie Hardwick; Isaac S Harris; Michael O Hengartner; Claudio Hetz; Hidenori Ichijo; Marja Jäättelä; Bertrand Joseph; Philipp J Jost; Philippe P Juin; William J Kaiser; Michael Karin; Thomas Kaufmann; Oliver Kepp; Adi Kimchi; Richard N Kitsis; Daniel J Klionsky; Richard A Knight; Sharad Kumar; Sam W Lee; John J Lemasters; Beth Levine; Andreas Linkermann; Stuart A Lipton; Richard A Lockshin; Carlos López-Otín; Scott W Lowe; Tom Luedde; Enrico Lugli; Marion MacFarlane; Frank Madeo; Michal Malewicz; Walter Malorni; Gwenola Manic; Jean-Christophe Marine; Seamus J Martin; Jean-Claude Martinou; Jan Paul Medema; Patrick Mehlen; Pascal Meier; Sonia Melino; Edward A Miao; Jeffery D Molkentin; Ute M Moll; Cristina Muñoz-Pinedo; Shigekazu Nagata; Gabriel Nuñez; Andrew Oberst; Moshe Oren; Michael Overholtzer; Michele Pagano; Theocharis Panaretakis; Manolis Pasparakis; Josef M Penninger; David M Pereira; Shazib Pervaiz; Marcus E Peter; Mauro Piacentini; Paolo Pinton; Jochen H M Prehn; Hamsa Puthalakath; Gabriel A Rabinovich; Markus Rehm; Rosario Rizzuto; Cecilia M P Rodrigues; David C Rubinsztein; Thomas Rudel; Kevin M Ryan; Emre Sayan; Luca Scorrano; Feng Shao; Yufang Shi; John Silke; Hans-Uwe Simon; Antonella Sistigu; Brent R Stockwell; Andreas Strasser; Gyorgy Szabadkai; Stephen W G Tait; Daolin Tang; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Andrew Thorburn; Yoshihide Tsujimoto; Boris Turk; Tom Vanden Berghe; Peter Vandenabeele; Matthew G Vander Heiden; Andreas Villunger; Herbert W Virgin; Karen H Vousden; Domagoj Vucic; Erwin F Wagner; Henning Walczak; David Wallach; Ying Wang; James A Wells; Will Wood; Junying Yuan; Zahra Zakeri; Boris Zhivotovsky; Laurence Zitvogel; Gerry Melino; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 12.067

8.  Nuclear RIPK3 and MLKL contribute to cytosolic necrosome formation and necroptosis.

Authors:  Kathrin Weber; Ria Roelandt; Inge Bruggeman; Yann Estornes; Peter Vandenabeele
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-01-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.