| Literature DB >> 33235535 |
Eneyew Talie1, Habtamu Wondiye1, Nigus Kassie2, Hordofa Gutema1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization recommends that 1% to 3% of a country's population should donate blood to meet its demand and should focus on young people to achieve 100% voluntary blood donation. The aim of this study was to assess voluntary blood donation among Bahir Dar University students by using an integrated behavioral model.Entities:
Keywords: integrated behavioral model; path analysis; voluntary blood donation
Year: 2020 PMID: 33235535 PMCID: PMC7680172 DOI: 10.2147/JBM.S277411
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Blood Med ISSN: 1179-2736
Internal Consistency of Constructs of the Integrated Behavioral Model
| Constructs | Cronbach Alpha |
|---|---|
| Experiential attitude | 0.76 |
| Instrumental attitude | 0.79 |
| Injunctive norm | 0.80 |
| Descriptive norm | 0.80 |
| Perceived control | 0.70 |
| Self-efficacy | 0.80 |
| Intention | 0.87 |
Sociodemographic Characteristics of Bahir Dar University Students, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 619)
| Variables | Category | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 373 | 60.3 |
| Female | 246 | 39.7 | |
| Age | 16–20 | 274 | 44.3 |
| 21–25 | 271 | 43.8 | |
| 26 and above | 74 | 12.0 | |
| Religion | Orthodox | 509 | 82.2 |
| Muslim | 54 | 8.7 | |
| Protestant | 50 | 8.1 | |
| Catholic | 4 | 0.6 | |
| Other | 2 | 0.3 | |
| Residence | Urban | 397 | 64.1 |
| Rural | 222 | 35.9 | |
| Department | Nurse | 52 | 8.4 |
| Midwife | 47 | 7.6 | |
| Laboratory | 43 | 6.9 | |
| Maths | 12 | 1.9 | |
| Biology | 36 | 5.8 | |
| Economics | 29 | 4.7 | |
| Accounting | 30 | 4.8 | |
| Management | 24 | 3.9 | |
| Civics | 14 | 2.3 | |
| Anthropology | 15 | 2.4 | |
| Natural fresh | 190 | 30.7 | |
| Social fresh | 127 | 20.5 | |
| Year of study | First year | 317 | 51.2 |
| Second year | 135 | 21.8 | |
| Third year | 119 | 19.2 | |
| Fourth year | 48 | 7.8 |
Environmental Factors of Blood Donation Among Bahir Dar University Students, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020
| Variables | Category | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comfortable at screening procedure | Yes | 99 | 85.3 |
| No | 17 | 14.7 | |
| Satisfied with care Providers counseling | Yes | 91 | 78.4 |
| No | 25 | 21.6 | |
| Know where blood bank is located | Yes | 252 | 40.7 |
| No | 367 | 59.3 | |
| Have time to give blood | Yes | 158 | 25.5 |
| No | 461 | 74.5 | |
| Participated in blood donation campaign | Yes | 84 | 15.7 |
| No | 535 | 84.3 |
Association Between Behavioral Intention and Constructs of IBM Among Bahir Dar University Students, March, 2020
| IBM Constructs | P value | 95.0% Confidence Interval | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Mean | SD | Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||
| Experiential attitude | −0.052 | 15.2746 | 4.12297 | −0.102 | −0.002 | |
| Instrumental attitude | 0.002 | 350.0307 | 128.26921 | 0.067 | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Injunctive norm | 0.006 | 147.5945 | 66.96617 | 0.003 | 0.010 | |
| Descriptive norm | 0.043 | 11.6737 | 3.14022 | 0.237 | −0.028 | 0.115 |
| Perceived control | 0.000 | 144.3199 | 60.80930 | 0.882 | −0.003 | 0.004 |
| Self-efficacy | 0.364 | 12.4120 | 3.61898 | 0.302 | 0.425 | |
Notes: Adjusted R2 = 0.514; bold shows significant variable p<0.05.
Factors Associated with Voluntary Blood Donation Among Bahir Dar University Students
| Variables | Category | Voluntary Blood Donation | COR (CI) | AOR (CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||||
| Sex | Male | 56 | 317 | 1 | |
| Female | 48 | 198 | 1.37 (0.898–2.098) | 1.92 (1.15_3.22)** | |
| Year of study | First | 43 | 274 | 1 | |
| Second | 16 | 119 | 0.857 (0.464–1.581) | 0.787 (0.390–1.590) | |
| Third | 33 | 86 | 2.45 (1.46–4.09) | 2.88 (1.55–5.35)** | |
| Fourth | 12 | 36 | 2.124 (1.025–4.399) | 2.274 (0.927–5.581) | |
| Residence | Urban | 75 | 322 | 1 | |
| Rural | 29 | 193 | 0.645 (0.40–1.026) | 0.650 (0.367–1.150) | |
| Knowledge | 1.68 (1.46–1.93) | 1.53 (1.32–1.77)** | |||
| Experiential attitude | 0.924 (0.876–0.975) | 1.005 (0.936–1.080) | |||
| Instrumental attitude | 1.003 (1.001–1.005) | 1.001 (0.998–1.003) | |||
| Injunctive norm | 1.007 (1.004, 1.010) | 0.999 (0.995–1.004) | |||
| Descriptive norm | 1.17 (1.09–1.25) | 1.10 (1.01–1.12)** | |||
| Perceived control | 1.002 (0.999–1.006) | 0.999 (0.995–1.004) | |||
| Self-efficacy | 1.225 (1.147–1.308) | 0.964 (0.880–1.056) | |||
| Intention | 1.48 (1.35–1.63) | 1.42 (1.28–1.57)** | |||
Notes: **Shows significant variable at p value <0.05; R square=37.4%.
Figure 1Path analysis model for voluntary blood donation among Bahir Dar University students. Bold shows significant variable at p value <0.05.