Literature DB >> 3323525

Repair of thymine.guanine and uracil.guanine mismatched base-pairs in bacteriophage M13mp18 DNA heteroduplexes.

S Shenoy1, K C Ehrlich, M Ehrlich.   

Abstract

Repair of thymine.guanine (T.G) and uracil.guanine (U.G) mismatched base-pairs in bacteriophage M13mp18 replicative form (RF) DNA was compared upon transfection into repair-proficient or repair-deficient Escherichia coli strains. Oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis was used to prepare covalently closed circular heteroduplexes that contained the mismatched base-pair at a restriction recognition site. The heteroduplexes were unmethylated at dam (5'-GATC-3') sites to avoid methylation-directed biasing of repair. In an E. coli host containing uracil-DNA glycosylase (ung+), about 97% of the transfecting U.G-containing heteroduplexes had the U residue excised by the uracil-excision repair system. With the analogous T.G mispair, mismatch repair operated on almost all of the transfecting heteroduplexes and removed the T residue in about 75% of them when the mismatched T was on the minus strand of the RF DNA. Similar preferential excision of the minus-strand's mismatched base was observed whether the heteroduplex RF DNA molecules had only one or both strands unmethylated at dcm (5'-CC(A/T)GG-3') sites and whether the RF DNA was prepared by primer extension in vitro or by reannealing mutant and non-mutant DNA strands. Also, the extent and directionality of repair was the same at a U.G mispair in ung- host cells as at the analogous T.G mispair in ung- or ung+ cells. Only in a mismatch repair-deficient (mutH-) host was the plus strand of the transfecting M13mp18 heteroduplex DNA preferentially repaired. It is suggested that the plus strand nick made by the M13-encoded gene II protein might be employed by a mutH- host to initiate repair on that strand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3323525     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90468-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  9 in total

1.  Transfection of heteroduplexes containing uracil.guanine or thymine.guanine mispairs into plant cells.

Authors:  N M Inamdar; X Y Zhang; C L Brough; W E Gardiner; D M Bisaro; M Ehrlich
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Escherichia coli mutator mutD5 is defective in the mutHLS pathway of DNA mismatch repair.

Authors:  R M Schaaper
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  d(GATC) sequences influence Escherichia coli mismatch repair in a distance-dependent manner from positions both upstream and downstream of the mismatch.

Authors:  R Bruni; D Martin; J Jiricny
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-06-10       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Mammalian cell processing of a unique uracil residue in simian virus 40 DNA.

Authors:  A Gentil; G Renault; A Margot; R Teoule; A Sarasin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Survival of phage M13 with uracils on one or both DNA strands.

Authors:  S Schünemann; D Schulte-Frohlinde
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1992-06

6.  A comparison of the fidelity of copying 5-methylcytosine and cytosine at a defined DNA template site.

Authors:  J C Shen; S Creighton; P A Jones; M F Goodman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Cytosine methylation and the fate of CpG dinucleotides in vertebrate genomes.

Authors:  D N Cooper; M Krawczak
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  DNA Mismatch Repair.

Authors:  M G Marinus
Journal:  EcoSal Plus       Date:  2012-11

9.  The very 5' end and the constant region of Ig genes are spared from somatic mutation because AID does not access these regions.

Authors:  Simonne Longerich; Atsushi Tanaka; Grazyna Bozek; Dan Nicolae; Ursula Storb
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 14.307

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.