| Literature DB >> 33234177 |
Shira Maguen1,2, Brandon J Griffin3,4, Laurel A Copeland5,6, Daniel F Perkins7, Cameron B Richardson7, Erin P Finley8,9, Dawne Vogt10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although research has shown that exposure to potentially traumatic and morally injurious events is associated with psychological symptoms among veterans, knowledge regarding functioning impacts remains limited.Entities:
Keywords: Depression; PTSD; functioning; moral injury; veterans
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33234177 PMCID: PMC9527674 DOI: 10.1017/S0033291720004249
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Med ISSN: 0033-2917 Impact factor: 10.592
Demographic and military-related characteristics (N = 7200)
| Variable | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 81.7% |
| Female | 18.3% |
| Undisclosed/missing | 0.0% |
| Age | |
| 20–24.9 | 19.5% |
| 25–29.9 | 22.4% |
| 30–39.9 | 27.9% |
| 40 + | 28.3% |
| Undisclosed/missing | 2.0% |
| Race/ethnicity | |
| Minority race/Eth. | 33.9% |
| European American | 66.1% |
| Undisclosed/missing | 0.0% |
| Branch of service | |
| Army | 37.8% |
| Navy | 20.7% |
| Air Force | 24.9% |
| Marines | 16.6% |
| Undisclosed/missing | 0.0% |
| Rank | |
| Officer/warrant | 24.4% |
| Enlisted | 75.6% |
| Undisclosed/missing | 0.0% |
| Deployments | |
| 0 | 29.2% |
| 1 | 27.4% |
| 2 | 16.5% |
| 3 + | 26.8% |
| Undisclosed/missing | 0.1% |
| Positive PTSD screen | |
| Yes | 7.5% |
| No | 92.4% |
| Undisclosed/missing | 0.1% |
| Positive depression screen | |
| Yes | 17.5% |
| No | 82.1% |
| Undisclosed/missing | 0.1% |
Fit indices for one to six class latent growth mixture models of functioning outcomes
| Outcome | AIC | BIC | aBIC | LRT | BLRT | Entropy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relationship functioning | ||||||
| 1-class | 39 000.513 | 39 068.264 | 39 036.487 | |||
| 2-class | 38 657.702 | 38 752.553 | 38 708.064 | 0.96 | ||
| 3-class | 38 362.635 | 38 484.586 | 38 427.387 | 0.92 | ||
| 4-class | 38 199.419 | 38 348.470 | 38 278.560 | 0.72 | ||
| 5-class | 38 055.979 | 38 232.132 | 38 149.510 | 0.74 | ||
| 6-class | 37 929.576 | 38 132.829 | 38 037.496 | 0.75 | ||
| Health functioning | ||||||
| 1-class | 23 085.045 | 23 153.795 | 23 122.018 | |||
| 2-class | 22 677.169 | 22 773.419 | 22 728.930 | 0.91 | ||
| 3-class | 22 481.262 | 22 605.012 | 22 547.812 | 0.92 | ||
| 4-class | 22 270.159 | 22 421.410 | 22 351.499 | 0.92 | ||
| 5-class | 22 149.777 | 22 328.527 | 22 245.905 | 0.91 | ||
| 6-class | 22 081.321 | 22 287.571 | 22 192.238 | 0.88 | ||
| Work functioning | ||||||
| 1-class | 32 221.208 | 32 289.288 | 32 257.511 | |||
| 2-class | 31 181.743 | 31 277.056 | 31 232.567 | 0.90 | ||
| 3-class | 30 548.055 | 30 670.600 | 30 613.400 | 0.89 | ||
| 4-class | 29 990.807 | 30 140.585 | 30 070.674 | 0.88 | ||
| 5-class | 29 495.743 | 29 672.753 | 29 590.131 | 0.89 | ||
| 6-class | 29 298.521 | 29 502.763 | 29 407.430 | 0.88 | ||
AIC, Akaike Information Criterion; BIC, Bayesian Information Criterion; aBIC, Sample Size Adjusted Bayesian Information Criterion; LRT, Lo-Mendel-Rubin Likelihood Ratio Test; BLRT, Bootstrapped Likelihood Ratio Test.
Best-fitting model.
Growth parameters by known class
| Relationship | Health | Work | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classes | Est. | S.E. | Est. | S.E. | Est. | S.E. |
| Class 1 | ||||||
| Intercept | 3.68*** | 0.048 | 4.29*** | 0.011 | 3.19*** | 0.147 |
| Slope | −0.23*** | 0.041 | −0.05*** | 0.006 | 1.20** | 0.368 |
| Quadratic | 0.07*** | 0.013 | 0.01*** | 0.002 | −0.25** | 0.095 |
| Class 2 | ||||||
| Intercept | 2.91*** | 0.156 | 4.44*** | 0.050 | 4.16*** | 0.114 |
| Slope | 1.17*** | 0.279 | −0.87*** | 0.216 | −0.68*** | 0.156 |
| Quadratic | −0.15 | 0.097 | 0.19* | 0.076 | 0.14** | 0.041 |
| Class 3 | ||||||
| Intercept | 4.52*** | 0.026 | 3.57*** | 0.114 | 4.79*** | 0.013 |
| Slope | −0.03 | 0.014 | 0.83*** | 0.183 | −0.02* | 0.009 |
| Quadratic | 0.01 | 0.004 | −0.16** | 0.060 | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Class 4 | ||||||
| Intercept | 4.77*** | 0.063 | – | – | – | – |
| Slope | −1.03*** | 0.093 | – | – | – | – |
| Quadratic | 0.15 | 0.093 | – | – | – | – |
Est., estimate; S.E., standard error.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Fig. 1.Estimated means by known class for relationship, health, and work functioning.
Regression of intercept growth parameter on covariates
| Relationship | Health | Work | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covariate | Est. | S.E. | Est. | S.E. | Est. | S.E. |
| Posttraumatic stress | −0.034*** | 0.009 | −0.013** | 0.005 | −0.014* | 0.007 |
| Depression | −0.165*** | 0.007 | −0.142*** | 0.004 | −0.081*** | 0.006 |
| Moral injury – Witness | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.009* | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Moral injury – Perpetration | −0.046*** | 0.009 | −0.038*** | 0.005 | −0.038*** | 0.007 |
| Moral injury – Betrayal | −0.030*** | 0.008 | −0.036*** | 0.005 | −0.016** | 0.005 |
Est., estimate; S.E., standard error.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Multinomial logistic regressions predicting class membership
| Posttraumatic stress | Depression | Moral injury – Witness | Moral injury – Perpetration | Moral injury – Betrayal | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| Relationship functioning | ||||||||||
| High and decreasing | 0.12 | 0.01–3.72 | 0.91 | 0.72–1.16 | 1.13 | 0.91–1.40 | 1.35* | 1.05–1.73 | 0.70* | 0.55–0.89 |
| Moderate and increasing | 0.82 | 0.64–1.06 | 1.26*** | 1.10–1.46 | 1.15 | 0.94–1.40 | 1.36** | 1.12–1.66 | 0.92 | 0.73–1.15 |
| Moderate and stable | 1.02 | 0.93–1.11 | 1.20*** | 1.13–1.28 | 0.95 | 0.88–1.03 | 1.02 | 0.92–1.12 | 1.10 | 1.00–1.20 |
| Health functioning | ||||||||||
| High and decreasing | 0.88 | 0.69–1.14 | 0.74* | 0.56–0.97 | 1.06 | 0.87–1.28 | 1.29* | 1.07–1.55 | 1.01 | 0.81–1.26 |
| Moderate and increasing | 0.94 | 0.72–1.22 | 1.04 | 0.86–1.26 | 0.97 | 0.76–1.22 | 1.66* | 1.22–2.25 | 0.98 | 0.75–1.38 |
| Work functioning | ||||||||||
| High and decreasing | 1.08 | 0.95–1.21 | 1.35*** | 1.22–1.48 | 1.06 | 0.92–1.22 | 1.35*** | 1.17–1.57 | 1.05 | 0.91–1.22 |
| Moderate and increasing | 1.05 | 0.96–1.14 | 1.35*** | 1.26–1.44 | 1.11* | 1.02–1.22 | 1.16** | 1.05–1.29 | 1.01 | 0.91–1.11 |
Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI) represent the change in odds of assignment to each comparison class relative to the reference class (High and Stable Functioning) per unit increase in each predictor.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.