| Literature DB >> 33233332 |
Hyung-Joong Kim1, Sun Haeng Lee1,2, Sung Hyun Lee3, Jihong Lee4, Hocheol Kim5, Gyu Tae Chang1,4, Donghun Lee6.
Abstract
Allium macrostemon (AM) may affect bone growth by regulating bone formation and resorption. To examine the effect of AM on bone growth, 48 rats were divided into four administration groups in which either distilled water, AM (100 and 300 mg/kg), or recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH; 20 μg/kg) was administered for 10 days. On day 9, all animals were intraperitoneally injected with tetracycline hydrochloride (20 mg/kg), and 48 h after the injection, the rats were sacrificed. Their tibial sections were photographed to measure bone growth. Antigen-specific immunohistochemistry was performed to detect insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2). The food intake of the AM 100 mg/kg group was higher; however, the food intake of the AM 300 mg/kg group was less than that of the control group. The rhGH and AM 100 mg/kg groups showed greater rates of bone growth (359.0 ± 23.7 and 373.1 ± 28.0 μm/day, respectively) compared with the control group. IGF-1 and BMP-2 in the AM and rhGH groups were highly expressed. Indigestion at higher doses of AM led to nonsignificant bone growth in spite of increased IGF-1 and BMP-2 expression. Therefore, a suitable amount of AM could increase bone growth.Entities:
Keywords: Allium macrostemon; bone growth; bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2); insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33233332 PMCID: PMC7700597 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25225449
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Daily body weight of female adolescent rats.
| Day | Control | rhGH | AM 100 | AM 300 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 106.8 ± 6.2 | 106.5 ± 4.4 | 107.9 ± 5.4 | 106.5 ± 3.4 | 0.892 |
| 2 | 110.6 ± 7.2 | 109.7 ± 5.2 | 112.4 ± 5.0 | 109.2 ± 3.4 | 0.482 |
| 3 | 117.1 ± 7.3 | 117.3 ± 5.8 | 119.7 ± 5.4 | 115.8 ± 3.2 | 0.414 |
| 4 | 121.9 ± 7.8 | 122.0 ± 5.9 | 124.8 ± 5.2 | 120.3 ± 3.9 | 0.314 |
| 5 | 126.5 ± 7.9 | 126.9 ± 6.0 | 130.6 ± 6.0 | 124.6 ± 3.0 | 0.111 |
| 6 | 131.5 ± 8.2 | 131.2 ± 6.2 | 134.8 ± 6.0 | 128.5 ± 3.0 | 0.111 |
| 7 | 137.0 ± 7.9 | 137.2 ± 7.4 | 140.7 ± 6.4 | 133.8 ± 3.8 | 0.101 |
| 8 | 139.8 ± 8.4 | 140.4 ± 7.2 | 144.3 ± 6.1 # | 135.9 ± 4.0 # | 0.031 * |
| 9 | 143.3 ± 8.0 | 144.0 ± 7.1 | 149.2 ± 7.6 # | 140.6 ± 4.6 # | 0.033 * |
| 10 | 145.3 ± 7.4 | 145.7 ± 8.9 | 150.9 ± 8.9 # | 140.1 ± 6.7 # | 0.019 * |
| 11 | 147.6 ± 8.1 | 146.8 ± 9.3 | 152.1 ± 9.3 # | 142.8 ± 6.3 # | 0.068 |
Control: distilled water (10 mL/kg, p.o.) group; rhGH: recombinant human growth hormone (20 μg/kg, s.c.) group; AM 100: A. macrostemon (100 mg/kg, p.o.) group; AM 300: A. macrostemon (300 mg/kg, p.o.) group. Each value is the mean ± standard deviation of 12 rats. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA: * p < 0.05. # indicates statistical significance based on Tukey’s multiple comparison.
Body weight and daily food intake gains (g) over 10 days in female adolescent rats.
| Control | rhGH | AM 100 | AM 300 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight gain (%/rat) | 38.26 ± 3.99 | 37.88 ± 6.86 | 41.13 ± 7.69 | 34.20 ± 8.07 | 0.118 |
| Daily food intake gain (g/cage) | 597.3 ± 7.7 # | 613.5 ± 19.6 # | 650.0 ± 22.1 # | 565.3 ± 12.6 # | 0.002 ** |
Control: distilled water (10 mL/kg, p.o.) group; rhGH: recombinant human growth hormone (20 μg/kg, s.c.) group; AM 100: A. macrostemon (100 mg/kg, p.o.) group; AM 300: A. macrostemon (300 mg/kg, p.o.) group. Each value is the mean ± standard deviation of 12 rats or three cages. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA: ** p < 0.01. # indicates statistical significance based on Tukey’s multiple comparison.
Figure 1Fluorescence photomicrograph of a longitudinal section of the proximal tibia. The fluorescent line corresponds to the tetracycline hydrochloride (20 mg/kg) injection. The arrow indicates the length of growth. (A) Control (distilled water) group, (B) recombinant human growth hormone (20 μg/kg, s.c.) group, (C) A. macrostemon 100 mg/kg group, (D) A. macrostemon 300 mg/kg group. Scale bar = 200 μm.
Figure 2The longitudinal bone growth rate. Control: distilled water (10 mL/kg, p.o.) group; rhGH: recombinant human growth hormone (20 μg/kg, s.c.) group; AM 100: A. macrostemon (100 mg/kg, p.o.) group; AM 300: A. macrostemon (300 mg/kg, p.o.) group. Each value is the mean ± standard deviation of 12 rats. Statistical significance was determined using a t-test: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, compared with control.
Figure 3Immunohistochemical localization of insulin-like growth factor-1 in the growth plate. Control: distilled water (10 mL/kg, p.o.) group; rhGH: recombinant human growth hormone (20 μg/kg, s.c.) group; AM 100: A. macrostemon (100 mg/kg, p.o.) group; AM 300: A. macrostemon (300 mg/kg, p.o.) group. RZ: resting zone; PZ: proliferative zone; HZ: hypertrophic zone. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 4Immunohistochemical localization of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in the growth plate. Control: distilled water (10 mL/kg, p.o.) group; rhGH: recombinant human growth hormone (20 μg/kg, s.c.) group; AM 100: A. macrostemon (100 mg/kg, p.o.) group; AM 300: A. macrostemon (300 mg/kg, p.o.) group. RZ: resting zone; PZ: proliferative zone; HZ: hypertrophic zone. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Immunohistochemical localization of IGF-1 on the proximal tibial growth plate in rats.
| Control | rhGH | AM 100 | AM 300 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall expressions (n) | 30.7 ± 2.9 # | 92.7 ± 13.8 # | 64.7 ± 8.4 | 66.0 ± 4.4 | < 0.001 *** |
| Resting zone | 4.3 ± 0.6 # | 17.7 ± 4.5 # | 11.3 ± 0.6 # | 6.3 ± 1.5 | 0.001 ** |
| Proliferative zone | 12.0 ± 1.7 # | 50.0 ± 5.2 # | 32.3 ± 4.5 | 34.3 ± 5.1 | < 0.001 *** |
| Hypertrophic zone | 14.3 ± 2.1 # | 25.0 ± 4.4 # | 21.3 ± 4.5 | 25.3 ± 0.6 # | 0.012 * |
Control: distilled water (10 mL/kg, p.o.) group; rhGH: recombinant human growth hormone (20 μg/kg, s.c.) group; AM 100: A. macrostemon (100 mg/kg, p.o.) group; AM 300: A. macrostemon (300 mg/kg, p.o.) group. Each value is the mean ± standard deviation of 12 rats or three cages. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. # indicates statistical significance based on Tukey’s multiple comparison.
Immunohistochemical localization of BMP-2 on the proximal tibial growth plate in rats.
| Control | rhGH | AM 100 | AM 300 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall expressions (n) | 24.0 ± 3.6 # | 52.3 ± 5.5 | 42.0 ± 6.6 | 44.7 ± 4.9 | 0.001 ** |
| Resting zone | 2.7 ± 3.1 | 5.7 ± 5.5 | 3.7 ± 4.0 | 3.7 ± 3.5 | 0.840 |
| Proliferative zone | 12.3 ± 3.1 # | 27.7 ± 3.5 | 22.0 ± 3.6 | 24.3 ± 3.5 | 0.003 ** |
| Hypertrophic zone | 9.0 ± 1.0 # | 19.0 ± 2.0 | 16.3 ± 2.1 | 16.7 ± 3.1 | 0.002 ** |
Control: distilled water (10 mL/kg, p.o.) group; rhGH: recombinant human growth hormone (20 μg/kg, s.c.) group; AM 100: A. macrostemon (100 mg/kg, p.o.) group; AM 300: A. macrostemon (300 mg/kg, p.o.) group. Each value is the mean ± standard deviation of 12 rats or three cages. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA: ** p < 0.01. # indicates statistical significance based on Tukey’s multiple comparison.