Literature DB >> 33233016

Transforming the Medication Regimen Review Process Using Telemedicine to Prevent Adverse Events.

Sandra L Kane-Gill1,2, Adrian Wong1,3, Colleen M Culley1,2, Subashan Perera3,4, Maureen D Reynolds1, Steven M Handler3,5, John A Kellum6, Monica B Aspinall7, Megan E Pellett7, Keith E Long1, David A Nace3, Richard D Boyce5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: Federally-mandated consultant pharmacist-conducted retrospective medication regimen reviews (MRRs) are designed to improve medication safety in nursing homes (NH). However, MRRs are potentially ineffective. A new model of care that improves access to and efficiency of consultant pharmacists is needed. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of pharmacist-led telemedicine services on reducing high-risk medication adverse drug events (ADEs) for NH residents using medication reconciliation and prospective MRR on admission plus ongoing clinical decision support alerts throughout the residents' stay.
DESIGN: Quality improvement study using a stepped-wedge design comparing the novel service to usual care in a one-year evaluation from November 2016 to October 2017.
SETTING: Four NHs (two urban, two suburban) in Southwestern Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: All residents in the four NHs were screened. There were 2,127 residents admitted having 652 alerts in the active period. INTERVENTION: Upon admission, pharmacists conducted medication reconciliation and prospective MRR for residents and also used telemedicine for communication with cognitively-intact residents. Post-admission, pharmacists received clinical decision support alerts to conduct targeted concurrent MRRs and telemedicine. MEASUREMENT: Main outcome was incidence of high-risk medication, alert-specific ADEs. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalization, 30-day readmission rates, and consultant pharmacists' recommendations.
RESULTS: Consultant pharmacists provided 769 recommendations. The intervention group had a 92% lower incidence of alert-specific ADEs than usual care (9 vs 31; 0.14 vs 0.61/1,000-resident-days; adjusted incident rate ratio (AIRR) = 0.08 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.01-0.40]; P = .002). All-cause hospitalization was similar between groups (149 vs 138; 2.33 vs 2.70/1,000-resident-days; AIRR = 1.06 (95% CI = 0.72-1.58); P = .75), as were 30-day readmissions (110 vs 102; 1.72 vs 2.00/1,000-resident-days; AIRR = 1.21 (95% CI = 0.76-1.93); P = .42).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first evaluation of the impact of pharmacist-led patient-centered telemedicine services to manage high-risk medications during transitional care and throughout the resident's NH stay, supporting a new model of patient care.
© 2020 The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse drug events; clinical decision support; medication errors; nursing home; telemedicine

Year:  2020        PMID: 33233016     DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  5 in total

Review 1.  Intelligent Telehealth in Pharmacovigilance: A Future Perspective.

Authors:  Heba Edrees; Wenyu Song; Ania Syrowatka; Aurélien Simona; Mary G Amato; David W Bates
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 5.228

2.  Research and Scholarly Methods: Pragmatic Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Onyeche Oche; Chaorong Wu; Logan T Murry; Korey A Kennelty
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Pharm       Date:  2021-11-02

3.  There and back again: the shape of telemedicine in U.S. nursing homes following COVID-19.

Authors:  James H Ford; Sally A Jolles; Dee Heller; Madeline Langenstroer; Christopher Crnich
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.070

Review 4.  Decision Support Tools in Adult Long-term Care Facilities: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Linda Lapp; Kieren Egan; Lisa McCann; Moira Mackenzie; Ann Wales; Roma Maguire
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 7.076

Review 5.  Nursing Home-Sensitive Hospitalizations and the Relevance of Telemedicine: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Maria Paula Valk-Draad; Sabine Bohnet-Joschko
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.