INTRODUCTION: When the first COVID-19 infections were reported in Germany, fear and anxiety spread faster than the pandemic itself. While moderate amounts of fear of a COVID-19 infection may be functional, generalized anxiety and the potentially resulting distress and psychopathology may possibly be detrimental to people's health. Authorities need to avoid a countrywide panic, on the one hand, but foster a realistic awareness of the actual threat, on the other hand. OBJECTIVES: The current cross-sectional study aimed to investigate psychological reactions in response to the real or perceived infection threats. In particular, the analysis should reveal whether COVID-19-related fear and generalized anxiety in times of COVID-19 have distinct correlates. METHODS: A nationwide study was conducted from March 10th to May 4th 2020 in Germany (n = 15,308; 10,824 women, 4433 men, 51 other). Generalized anxiety was assessed using the GAD-7, while COVID-19-related fear was measured using a self-generated item. Both outcome variables were entered into linear regression models. Demographic information, depressive symptoms, trust in governmental interventions, subjective level of information regarding COVID-19 and media use were used to predict generalized anxiety and COVID-19-related fear. RESULTS: The data revealed distinct correlates of COVID-19-related fear and generalized anxiety. Although COVID-19-related fear and generalized anxiety had overlapping predictors, such as neuroticism, they most prominently differed in age distribution and direction of an urban-rural disparity: generalized anxiety decreases with age, but COVID-19-related fear is most pronounced in elderly participants. Generalized anxiety is also more prevalent in rural communities, but COVID-19-related fear is elevated in metropoles. Furthermore, the presence of a risk disease increases COVID-19-related fear, but not generalized anxiety. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that COVID-19-related fear is often justified considering the individual risk of infection or complication due to infection. Some of the characteristics that predict COVID-19-related fear leave generalized anxiety unaffected or show divergent predictive directions. The present findings hint toward two related, but discriminant constructs.
INTRODUCTION: When the first COVID-19infections were reported in Germany, fear and anxiety spread faster than the pandemic itself. While moderate amounts of fear of a COVID-19infection may be functional, generalized anxiety and the potentially resulting distress and psychopathology may possibly be detrimental to people's health. Authorities need to avoid a countrywide panic, on the one hand, but foster a realistic awareness of the actual threat, on the other hand. OBJECTIVES: The current cross-sectional study aimed to investigate psychological reactions in response to the real or perceived infection threats. In particular, the analysis should reveal whether COVID-19-related fear and generalized anxiety in times of COVID-19 have distinct correlates. METHODS: A nationwide study was conducted from March 10th to May 4th 2020 in Germany (n = 15,308; 10,824 women, 4433 men, 51 other). Generalized anxiety was assessed using the GAD-7, while COVID-19-related fear was measured using a self-generated item. Both outcome variables were entered into linear regression models. Demographic information, depressive symptoms, trust in governmental interventions, subjective level of information regarding COVID-19 and media use were used to predict generalized anxiety and COVID-19-related fear. RESULTS: The data revealed distinct correlates of COVID-19-related fear and generalized anxiety. Although COVID-19-related fear and generalized anxiety had overlapping predictors, such as neuroticism, they most prominently differed in age distribution and direction of an urban-rural disparity: generalized anxiety decreases with age, but COVID-19-related fear is most pronounced in elderly participants. Generalized anxiety is also more prevalent in rural communities, but COVID-19-related fear is elevated in metropoles. Furthermore, the presence of a risk disease increases COVID-19-related fear, but not generalized anxiety. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that COVID-19-related fear is often justified considering the individual risk of infection or complication due to infection. Some of the characteristics that predict COVID-19-related fear leave generalized anxiety unaffected or show divergent predictive directions. The present findings hint toward two related, but discriminant constructs.
Authors: Benjamin Weismüller; Adam Schweda; Nora Dörrie; Venja Musche; Madeleine Fink; Hannah Kohler; Eva-Maria Skoda; Martin Teufel; Alexander Bäuerle Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-01-13
Authors: Cuiyan Wang; Agata Chudzicka-Czupała; Michael L Tee; María Inmaculada López Núñez; Connor Tripp; Mohammad A Fardin; Hina A Habib; Bach X Tran; Katarzyna Adamus; Joseph Anlacan; Marta E Aparicio García; Damian Grabowski; Shahzad Hussain; Men T Hoang; Mateusz Hetnał; Xuan T Le; Wenfang Ma; Hai Q Pham; Patrick Wincy C Reyes; Mahmoud Shirazi; Yilin Tan; Cherica A Tee; Linkang Xu; Ziqi Xu; Giang T Vu; Danqing Zhou; Natalie A Chan; Vipat Kuruchittham; Roger S McIntyre; Cyrus S H Ho; Roger Ho; Samuel F Sears Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Marilena Mousoulidou; Michailina Siakalli; Andri Christodoulou; Marios Argyrides Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Stephen X Zhang; Hao Huang; Jizhen Li; Mayra Antonelli-Ponti; Scheila Farias de Paiva; José Aparecido da Silva Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Paula Rodríguez-Fernández; Josefa González-Santos; Mirian Santamaría-Peláez; Raúl Soto-Cámara; Esteban Sánchez-González; Jerónimo J González-Bernal Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Tanja Laukkala; Jaana Suvisaari; Tom Rosenström; Eero Pukkala; Kristiina Junttila; Henna Haravuori; Katinka Tuisku; Toni Haapa; Pekka Jylhä Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 3.390