Literature DB >> 33232347

Data analysis and modeling pipelines for controlled networked social science experiments.

Vanessa Cedeno-Mieles1,2, Zhihao Hu3, Yihui Ren4, Xinwei Deng3, Noshir Contractor5, Saliya Ekanayake6, Joshua M Epstein7, Brian J Goode8, Gizem Korkmaz9, Chris J Kuhlman9, Dustin Machi9, Michael Macy10, Madhav V Marathe9,11, Naren Ramakrishnan1,12, Parang Saraf12, Nathan Self12.   

Abstract

There is large interest in networked social science experiments for understanding human behavior at-scale. Significant effort is required to perform data analytics on experimental outputs and for computational modeling of custom experiments. Moreover, experiments and modeling are often performed in a cycle, enabling iterative experimental refinement and data modeling to uncover interesting insights and to generate/refute hypotheses about social behaviors. The current practice for social analysts is to develop tailor-made computer programs and analytical scripts for experiments and modeling. This often leads to inefficiencies and duplication of effort. In this work, we propose a pipeline framework to take a significant step towards overcoming these challenges. Our contribution is to describe the design and implementation of a software system to automate many of the steps involved in analyzing social science experimental data, building models to capture the behavior of human subjects, and providing data to test hypotheses. The proposed pipeline framework consists of formal models, formal algorithms, and theoretical models as the basis for the design and implementation. We propose a formal data model, such that if an experiment can be described in terms of this model, then our pipeline software can be used to analyze data efficiently. The merits of the proposed pipeline framework is elaborated by several case studies of networked social science experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33232347      PMCID: PMC7685486          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  25 in total

1.  The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leslie A DeChurch; Jessica R Mesmer-Magnus
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2010-01

2.  RABIX: AN OPEN-SOURCE WORKFLOW EXECUTOR SUPPORTING RECOMPUTABILITY AND INTEROPERABILITY OF WORKFLOW DESCRIPTIONS.

Authors:  Gaurav Kaushik; Sinisa Ivkovic; Janko Simonovic; Nebojsa Tijanic; Brandi Davis-Dusenbery; Deniz Kural
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2017

3.  Active learning machine learns to create new quantum experiments.

Authors:  Alexey A Melnikov; Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup; Mario Krenn; Vedran Dunjko; Markus Tiersch; Anton Zeilinger; Hans J Briegel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Managing genomic variant calling workflows with Swift/T.

Authors:  Azza E Ahmed; Jacob Heldenbrand; Yan Asmann; Faisal M Fadlelmola; Daniel S Katz; Katherine Kendig; Matthew C Kendzior; Tiffany Li; Yingxue Ren; Elliott Rodriguez; Matthew R Weber; Justin M Wozniak; Jennie Zermeno; Liudmila S Mainzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Toil enables reproducible, open source, big biomedical data analyses.

Authors:  John Vivian; Arjun Arkal Rao; Frank Austin Nothaft; Christopher Ketchum; Joel Armstrong; Adam Novak; Jacob Pfeil; Jake Narkizian; Alden D Deran; Audrey Musselman-Brown; Hannes Schmidt; Peter Amstutz; Brian Craft; Mary Goldman; Kate Rosenbloom; Melissa Cline; Brian O'Connor; Megan Hanna; Chet Birger; W James Kent; David A Patterson; Anthony D Joseph; Jingchun Zhu; Sasha Zaranek; Gad Getz; David Haussler; Benedict Paten
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments.

Authors:  Siddharth Suri; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Dilemma of dilemmas: how collective and individual perspectives can clarify the size dilemma in voluntary linear public goods dilemmas.

Authors:  Daniel B Shank; Yoshihisa Kashima; Saam Saber; Thomas Gale; Michael Kirley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  A review of bioinformatic pipeline frameworks.

Authors:  Jeremy Leipzig
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 11.622

9.  Script of Scripts: A pragmatic workflow system for daily computational research.

Authors:  Gao Wang; Bo Peng
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Conducting interactive experiments online.

Authors:  Antonio A Arechar; Lucas Molleman; Simon Gächter
Journal:  Exp Econ       Date:  2017-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.