Nadine J Schrenker1, Zhuocheng Xie2,3, Peter Schweizer1, Marco Moninger1, Felix Werner1, Nicolas Karpstein1, Mirza Mačković1, George D Spyropoulos4, Manuela Göbelt5, Silke Christiansen5, Christoph J Brabec4,6, Erik Bitzek2, Erdmann Spiecker1. 1. Institute of Micro- and Nanostructure Research (IMN) and Center for Nanoanalysis and Electron Microscopy (CENEM), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Interdisciplinary Center for Nanostructured Films (IZNF), Cauerstrasse 3, 91058 Erlangen, Germany. 2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute I, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Martensstrasse 5, 91058 Erlangen, Germany. 3. Institute of Physical Metallurgy and Metal Physics, RWTH Aachen University, Kopernikusstr. 14, 52074, Aachen, Germany. 4. Institute of Materials for Electronics and Energy Technology (i-MEET), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and ZAE Bayern: Bavarian Center for Applied Energy Research, Martensstrasse 7, 91058 Erlangen, Germany. 5. Max-Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Staudtstrasse 2, 91058 Erlangen, Germany. 6. Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (HI-EerN), Immerwahrstrasse 2, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Abstract
Silver nanowire (AgNW) networks show excellent optical, electrical, and mechanical properties, which make them ideal candidates for transparent electrodes in flexible and stretchable devices. Various coating strategies and testing setups have been developed to further improve their stretchability and to evaluate their performance. Still, a comprehensive microscopic understanding of the relationship between mechanical and electrical failure is missing. In this work, the fundamental deformation modes of five-fold twinned AgNWs in anisotropic networks are studied by large-scale SEM straining tests that are directly correlated with corresponding changes in the resistance. A pronounced effect of the network anisotropy on the electrical performance is observed, which manifests itself in a one order of magnitude lower increase in resistance for networks strained perpendicular to the preferred wire orientation. Using a scale-bridging microscopy approach spanning from NW networks to single NWs to atomic-scale defects, we were able to identify three fundamental deformation modes of NWs, which together can explain this behavior: (i) correlated tensile fracture of NWs, (ii) kink formation due to compression of NWs in transverse direction, and (iii) NW bending caused by the interaction of NWs in the strained network. A key observation is the extreme deformability of AgNWs in compression. Considering HRTEM and MD simulations, this behavior can be attributed to specific defect processes in the five-fold twinned NW structure leading to the formation of NW kinks with grain boundaries combined with V-shaped surface reconstructions, both counteracting NW fracture. The detailed insights from this microscopic study can further improve fabrication and design strategies for transparent NW network electrodes.
Silver nanowire (AgNW) networks show excellent optical, electrical, and mechanical properties, which make them ideal candidates for transparent electrodes in flexible and stretchable devices. Various coating strategies and testing setups have been developed to further improve their stretchability and to evaluate their performance. Still, a comprehensive microscopic understanding of the relationship between mechanical and electrical failure is missing. In this work, the fundamental deformation modes of five-fold twinned AgNWs in anisotropic networks are studied by large-scale SEM straining tests that are directly correlated with corresponding changes in the resistance. A pronounced effect of the network anisotropy on the electrical performance is observed, which manifests itself in a one order of magnitude lower increase in resistance for networks strained perpendicular to the preferred wire orientation. Using a scale-bridging microscopy approach spanning from NW networks to single NWs to atomic-scale defects, we were able to identify three fundamental deformation modes of NWs, which together can explain this behavior: (i) correlated tensile fracture of NWs, (ii) kink formation due to compression of NWs in transverse direction, and (iii) NW bending caused by the interaction of NWs in the strained network. A key observation is the extreme deformability of AgNWs in compression. Considering HRTEM and MD simulations, this behavior can be attributed to specific defect processes in the five-fold twinned NW structure leading to the formation of NW kinks with grain boundaries combined with V-shaped surface reconstructions, both counteracting NW fracture. The detailed insights from this microscopic study can further improve fabrication and design strategies for transparent NW network electrodes.
Transparent conductive electrodes
(TCEs) are critical components in flexible and stretchable thin-film
optoelectronic devices. Applications range from organic solar cells
(OSCs) and organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) to touch panels and
smart clothing.[1−3] Therefore, many different fabrication concepts as
well as new materials for TCEs have been investigated and developed.
Indium tin oxide (ITO) is the most commonly used material for transparent
electrodes.[1] Yet, limitations for new developments
with ITO are its inherent brittleness, the low abundance of indium,
and costly fabrication procedures based on various vacuum deposition
techniques.[1] Promising candidates to replace
ITO are carbon nanotubes, metal nanowires, graphene, or conductive
polymers.[2,4] Of these, AgNW networks are most promising,
as they fulfill the requirement of a high transmittance (∼
90%) combined with a low sheet resistance (RS ≤ 100 Ω/sq) needed for OSC applications.[4,5] Moreover, they have the advantage of low-cost solution processability.
The suitability of AgNW networks as flexible and adaptable electrodes
and their fatigue resistance were demonstrated by bending cyclic fatigue
tests, where stable electrical performance with bending radii smaller
than 2 mm could be achieved.[6−10] Because of thin substrates the maximum bending strain in cycle fatigue
tests in those studies was below 2.5%, except for the study by Williams
et al.[9] who reported a bending strain of
5% at 1 mm bending radius. In addition, AgNW electrodes can tolerate
twisting and torsion motions.[2,3,11] These properties also facilitate the use of AgNW networks as strain
sensors, for instance, as wearable sensors for motion tracking in
healthcare applications.[7,12−14] In order to increase the strain to failure of NW electrodes, buckled
structures were invented.[15] A simple fabrication
method to generate buckled or wavy structures is to prestrain an elastomer
substrate for the electrode or device. Devices like OSCs with out-of-plane
buckling showed high stretchability up to 400% strain[16] and biaxially prestrained Au nanotrough networks with in-plane
buckling exhibited good fatigue performance under cyclic strain up
to 120%.[17] Moreover, recently a high stretchability
up to an external strain of 500% and a small resistance increase could
be achieved by glycerogel with AgNWs.[11] However, those materials require further investigations regarding
long-term stability under air exposure. Other fabrication concepts
include UV-ozone or plasma treatment to generate a rigid surface layer
to induce buckling[18−20] or swelling-induced surface patterning.[21−24] Additionally, lithographically defined serpentine structures are
used for stretchable electronics on elastomers.[25,26] The mechanical deformability of devices, which consist of intrinsically
stretchable and flexible components, can be further increased by using
kirigami design patterns.[27] Thus, highly
stretchable 3D structures can be fabricated, and due to the design
pattern the occurring stresses remain at low stress levels. This concept
was recently also applied to devices with AgNWs.[28,29]Furthermore, solution processing offers the possibility of
directional
alignment of NWs. This can be used to improve the optical, electrical,
and mechanical performance.[30−32] Partially aligned NW networks
used in OLEDs or OSCs improved the maximum luminance and power conversion
efficiency.[33,34] However, flexible TCE fabrication
at large scale remains a challenge. To date, various techniques have
been developed.[35] The Langmuir–Blodgett
technique applies compression via movable barriers on NWs dispersed
on a liquid surface.[36] Furthermore, shear
forces or capillary forces can promote the NW alignment, and techniques
like blading, dip coating, spray coating, or brush painting are applied.[31,34,37−40]In this study, we investigate
the effect of uniaxial straining
on the mechanical and electrical behavior of anisotropic NW network
electrodes made of five-fold twinned AgNWs. The microscopic deformation
and failure modes of the NW network electrodes are studied by large-scale
interrupted scanning electron microscopy (SEM) straining tests and
are directly correlated with corresponding changes in the resistance.
We identified three microscopic deformation modes of the five-fold
twinned NWs, which together can explain the observed pronounced effect
of the network anisotropy. NWs aligned along the straining direction
fail by local constriction and tensile fracture (mode A). In contrast,
NWs aligned perpendicular to the straining direction experience compressive
stresses due to the transverse contraction of the PET (polyethylene
terephthalate) foil, resulting in the formation of kink and boat-like
structures (mode B). Despite extreme plastic deformation these structures
stay electrically intact up to high strains. The two deformation modes
are further studied in pure form using in situ straining
in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and tensile testing of sparse
NW networks, where mutual interaction of NWs can be neglected. Another
deformation mode appears for NWs in dense networks typically used
for transparent electrodes. Such NWs experience more complex loading
scenarios due to local constraints from nearby NWs and NW junctions,
resulting in NW bending (mode A+B) in addition to the other modes.
Moreover, correlated fracture of NWs in such networks leads to extended
cracks with characteristic crack spacings similar to the behavior
observed for thin metal films.[41] To extend
our microscopic studies to the atomic scale, we investigate the formation
of crystal defects in individual NWs using high-resolution transmission
electron microscopy (HRTEM) combined with molecular dynamics (MD)
simulations under different loading conditions. In all three modes
the strongly localized deformation of NWs can be attributed to the
interaction of dislocations with the inherent twin boundaries (TBs)
of the five-fold twinned NWs. Furthermore, HRTEM analysis and MD simulations
of NW kinks consistently reveal the formation of high-angle grain
boundaries (GBs) terminated by characteristic V-shaped surface reconstructions
(V-defects), which appear to stabilize the NWs against fracture and
electrical failure. Finally, we propose a phenomenological model which,
based on the observed microscopic deformation modes, explains the
strong impact of network anisotropy on the mechanical and electrical
behavior of NW network electrodes. We expect that our comprehensive
microscopic investigation promotes new developments and fabrication
strategies towards improved flexible transparent NW electrodes.
Results
and Discussion
Properties of Nanowire Networks
The networks of 5-fold
twinned AgNWs studied in this work were fabricated via doctor-blading
on PET (23 μm) substrates as described in detail in Methods. Two different NW dispersions were used
containing NWs with a mean diameter of 35 and 85 nm, respectively.
In the following, the corresponding NWs are denoted as NW35 and NW85.
Both types of NWs possess high aspect ratios with NW lengths in the
range of several tens of micrometers. Panels a and b in Figure show SEM images of NW networks
produced by doctor blading using NW85 and NW35, respectively. During
the coating process shear forces and capillary forces cause the preferential
alignment of the NWs in the CD.[33,34] In both SEM images
the CD corresponds to the vertical direction in the image as indicated
by arrows. The anisotropy of the networks was evaluated by statistical
analysis of SEM images. The resulting probability density function
(PDF) with respect to the wire orientation is depicted in Figure c. For both networks,
the PDF reveals a pronounced peak centered around ∼0°
corresponding to the CD. Hence, both networks show a strong preferential
orientation of the NWs parallel to the CD. However, the peaks possess
a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 46° (for NW35) and 42°
(for NW85), and the PDFs do not reach zero at ±90°, indicating
that a significant number of NWs also lie in inclined (and even perpendicular)
directions, also evident from the SEM images. In both networks, ∼70%
of the NWs are aligned within ±30° with respect to the CD,
which has to be compared with 33% for a random orientation. The presence
of NWs inclined or perpendicular to the preferred orientation is a
prerequisite for a closely interconnected two-dimensional network,
which is advantageous for the electrical and mechanical performance
as will be discussed later.
Figure 1
Nanowire network characteristics. (a and b)
Doctor-bladed AgNW
networks. The coating direction (CD) is indicated by white arrows.
The average NW diameter in panel a is d̅ =
85 nm and in panel b is 35 nm. The difference in NW diameter is clearly
revealed in the close-ups, where the scale bar is 1 μm. The
corresponding NW networks are denoted as NW35 and NW85. (c) Probability
density distribution of NW orientation with respect to the CD revealing
a strongly preferred orientation in the CD (∼0°). (d)
Cross-section of a AgNW depicting five twin boundaries and a pentagonal
shape. (e) Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of a
single NW showing superposition of two zone axes (ZAs). Common diffraction
spots are black. (f) TEM image of a NW junction welded by thermal
annealing. (g) HRTEM image of the junction shown in panel e illustrating
the welded zone (WZ) between the NWs.
Nanowire network characteristics. (a and b)
Doctor-bladed AgNW
networks. The coating direction (CD) is indicated by white arrows.
The average NW diameter in panel a is d̅ =
85 nm and in panel b is 35 nm. The difference in NW diameter is clearly
revealed in the close-ups, where the scale bar is 1 μm. The
corresponding NW networks are denoted as NW35 and NW85. (c) Probability
density distribution of NW orientation with respect to the CD revealing
a strongly preferred orientation in the CD (∼0°). (d)
Cross-section of a AgNW depicting five twin boundaries and a pentagonal
shape. (e) Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of a
single NW showing superposition of two zone axes (ZAs). Common diffraction
spots are black. (f) TEM image of a NW junction welded by thermal
annealing. (g) HRTEM image of the junction shown in panel e illustrating
the welded zone (WZ) between the NWs.Regarding the physical properties of the AgNW networks, measurements
of the sheet resistance Rs resulted in
an average value of 10 ± 3 Ω/sq at an area coverage of
44% for NW35 networks and 21 ± 3 Ω/sq at an area coverage
of 41% for NW85 networks, respectively. This can be understood from
the fact that, for similar area coverage and NW length, the percolation
of a NW network increases with decreasing NW diameter, which, as a
consequence, also leads to a lower sheet resistance. With these coating
parameters the optical transmittance of NW35 networks is better than
70% in the wavelength range above 450 nm, as shown in a previous study.[42] The use of thinner NWs is superior to larger
NW diameters regarding the electrical performance of NW networks with
predefined optical transmittance.[5,43] For this reason,
we focused on the NW35 in the electrical measurements.A characteristic
feature of the AgNWs in both dispersions is their
five-fold twinned structure, which is a result of the wet chemical
synthesis, where the seed particles already contain five twins.[44] Due to the lack of a chemical synthesis route
of single-crystalline AgNWs for large-scale industrial applications,
five-fold twinned AgNWs are the preferred choice for TCEs. The pentagonal
shape with the five TBs is revealed in Figure d showing a scanning transmission electron
microscopy (STEM) image of a NW cross-section of a NW85. The five
twin segments are joined along a common quintuple line which corresponds
to the common crystallographic ⟨101⟩ direction and runs
along the NW axis in the growth direction.[45] The angle between two {111} planes in a cubic system is 70.53°.
Thus, by joining five wedge shaped twin segments, a positive partial
wedge disclination of 7.35° occurs in the AgNWs associated with
an inherent strain field.[45] Because of
the five-fold twinned structure, the diffraction pattern (DP) in plan-view
geometry is typically a superposition of two pairs of crystallographic
zone axes (ZAs). In the DP in Figure e, one twin segment is oriented along the [001] ZA,
whereas two other segments are oriented along the [1̅12] ZA
(see Figure S1 for a detailed DP analysis).
Additional weak diffraction spots result from double diffraction.
Thermal annealing of the NW networks at 100 °C was conducted
in order to reduce the resistance of the individual NW junctions,
thus improving the overall conductivity of the network. Upon annealing,
the insulating PVP (polyvinylpyrrolidone) layer, which has a thickness
of 1.3 ± 0.4 nm for the NW35 (see Figure S1) is removed and the NWs are welded together at their contact
points. The HRTEM images of a welded zone (WZ) in Figure f,g reveal a continuous transition
between the crystal lattices of the two NWs. This is in line with
our earlier study where we could show that thermal annealing evokes
local sintering of NW junctions by surface diffusion and homoepitaxial
regrowth.[46] The HRTEM images also reveal
an amorphous layer around the NWs, which is even thicker than the
initial PVP layer. This layer is assumed to consist mainly of PEDOT:PSS
(poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrenesulfonate)), which was
used as a sacrificial layer for the transfer of the NW network onto
the TEM grid.
Combined Mechanical and Electrical Testing
The anisotropic
networks were tested by interrupted large-scale SEM tensile tests.
The custom-built straining stage is designed in such a way that parallel
to the straining tests electrical measurements can be performed, as
illustrated in the schematic in Figure a. In order to investigate the effect of network anisotropy
on the electrical and mechanical performance, two batches were tested.
The first batch was strained parallel to the CD, and the second one
was strained perpendicular to the CD. Figure b shows the relative increase in resistance
in straining direction (ΔR/R0) as a function of engineering tensile strain revealing
a pronounced difference between the two batches. For 20% tensile strain
(elongation), the batch strained parallel to the CD shows a relative
resistance increase of ΔR/R0 ≈ 21. In contrast, the resistance increase of
the second batch, which was strained perpendicular to the CD, is almost
one order of magnitude lower, ΔR/R0 ≈ 2.4. This effect can be attributed to the different
microscopic deformation mechanisms, as will be discussed in the following.
Moreover, it reveals that the impact of network anisotropy and influence
of the NW orientation with respect to the applied load are in line
with previous studies on prestraining, where biaxially prestrained
samples could exceed the ones with uniaxial prestrain with respect
to the electrical response during straining.[47,48]
Figure 2
Correlated
electrical and mechanical testing. (a) Schematic illustration
of the experimental setup for resistance measurements during straining
(in y-direction) and combined investigations by electron
microscopy. (b) Relative resistance change in straining direction
versus engineering strain during tensile tests for two batches of
NW35 networks, where the straining direction is parallel (red) or
perpendicular (green) to the CD, respectively. The black line indicates
the resistance change due to the elongation.
Correlated
electrical and mechanical testing. (a) Schematic illustration
of the experimental setup for resistance measurements during straining
(in y-direction) and combined investigations by electron
microscopy. (b) Relative resistance change in straining direction
versus engineering strain during tensile tests for two batches of
NW35 networks, where the straining direction is parallel (red) or
perpendicular (green) to the CD, respectively. The black line indicates
the resistance change due to the elongation.When the straining direction is parallel to the CD, i.e. most of the wires are aligned in straining direction, single NWs
fracture in tensile mode when the strain reaches ∼3% (Figure a). Because of the
small number of fracture events, still no measurable increase in the
resistance of the NW network is observed at this strain level (Figure b). It is noteworthy
that tensile fracture does not directly occur at the NW junctions,
but often occurs close to them because of strain concentrations. This
indicates that the NWs are strongly welded together so that the junctions
can withstand the acting stresses without detachment. In other words,
the junctions are not the weakest points of the network under tensile
stress. Consequently, cracks are often deflected along horizontal
NWs, as it is shown in Figure a and schematically in Figure b. At 5% strain, more NWs start to fracture, which
is then also visible in the electrical measurements, as the percolation
of the network decreases. With increasing strain, the number of fractured
NWs increases, which results in horizontal cracks in the network,
extending over up to tens of micrometers, as exemplarily shown in Figure c,d. This shows that
rupture of NWs occurs in a spatially correlated way indicating that
stress transfer from one rupturing NW to neighboring NWs (via the
substrate or via NW junctions) takes place. This is similar to stress
transfer in fiber-reinforced composites.[49,50] Moreover, the occurrence of periodic cracks in the NW networks is
reminiscent of crack patterns in thin films that are strained in tension.[41,51] NWs in sparse networks also develop periodic cracks upon tensile
straining, as will be shown below. In comparison to dense networks,
the crack spacing is larger and cracks in different NWs are spatially
uncorrelated (see Figure c,i).
Figure 3
Deformation of NW networks strained parallel to the CD.
(a) Close-up
of fractured NWs at 3% strain (NW35). (b) Schematic of crack deflection
along horizontal NWs. (c) SEM image of a NW35 network strained to
20%. Extended cracks in the network are exemplarily highlighted with
yellow arrows. The average crack spacing is denoted as λ. The SEM images were taken under load.
(d) Close-up of an area in panel c illustrating correlated and extended
cracks of NWs. (e) Uniaxial strain (in y-direction)
causes a compressive strain in transverse direction (x-direction). The local strain is determined from an SEM image series
of NW85 (see SI Movie 1).The yellow rectangles
mark the areas which were used for feature tracking. The image shown
was taken at 10% global strain under load. (f) Local tensile and compressive
strains, ε and ε, as determined from the image series, versus the
global (applied) tensile engineering strain. The dashed and continuous
blue lines indicate a change in Poisson’s ratio of the PET
foil due to transition from elastic to plastic regime.
Figure 5
Ductile fracture of NWs
under tensile stress (deformation mode
A). (a) SEM image of a single AgNW glued on a PTP device for in situ tensile testing. (b) Representative engineering
stress–strain curve for a wire with a diameter of 215 nm. The
yield strength σ of the wire is
about 14 times higher than for bulk Ag indicating a strong size effect.
(c) Single NWs illustrating failure due to multiple tensile fracture.
(d) Bright-field (BF) TEM image of a sparse network strained up to
25% elongation illustrating the local deformation with necking and
ductile fracture. (e–h) STEM images of an in situ tensile test of a AgNW (d = 65 nm). Stacking faults
that formed by partial dislocations on {111} planes are indicated
by red arrows. (g) Two close-ups of the area marked with a blue frame
in panel f. A new stacking fault is highlighted in yellow. (h) The
fractured NW ends are tapered because of localized necking. (i) Average
crack spacing of dense and sparse NW35 networks as a function of tensile
strain.
Deformation of NW networks strained parallel to the CD.
(a) Close-up
of fractured NWs at 3% strain (NW35). (b) Schematic of crack deflection
along horizontal NWs. (c) SEM image of a NW35 network strained to
20%. Extended cracks in the network are exemplarily highlighted with
yellow arrows. The average crack spacing is denoted as λ. The SEM images were taken under load.
(d) Close-up of an area in panel c illustrating correlated and extended
cracks of NWs. (e) Uniaxial strain (in y-direction)
causes a compressive strain in transverse direction (x-direction). The local strain is determined from an SEM image series
of NW85 (see SI Movie 1).The yellow rectangles
mark the areas which were used for feature tracking. The image shown
was taken at 10% global strain under load. (f) Local tensile and compressive
strains, ε and ε, as determined from the image series, versus the
global (applied) tensile engineering strain. The dashed and continuous
blue lines indicate a change in Poisson’s ratio of the PET
foil due to transition from elastic to plastic regime.The uniaxial strain causes a contraction in the transverse
direction.
In the elastic regime the ratio of the axial and the transverse strain
is defined as Poisson’s ratio. The NWs show a strong adhesion
to the PET substrate, as no delamination or out-of-plane buckling
is observed. The good adhesion is assumed to be promoted by polymer
binder in the NW dispersion as well as residual surfactant PVP. Indeed,
an organic intermediate layer with a thickness in the range of 1–10
nm at the substrate–NW interface can be clearly identified
from cross-sectional EELS and EDX measurements (see Figure S2). All the microscopic observations support the conclusion
that the PET foil effectively transfers the strain to which it is
subjected to the adhered NWs. PET has a Poisson’s ratio of
0.37–0.44 for elastic deformation and shows plastic yielding
at ∼ 3.5% strain.[52] To confirm the
compressive strain in transverse direction, the local strain in x- and y-directions was evaluated using
automated feature tracking (see Figures a and 3e,f). At a
global tensile strain of 10% in the y-direction (read
from the straining device), a local strain value ε of 9.9% was determined. This indicates
that the applied tensile strain is evenly distributed across the sample.
The corresponding transverse compressive strain ε was determined as 4.1% using feature
tracking. As expected,[41,53] at the transition from elastic
to plastic deformation, a change of the contraction ratio (i.e., “plastic Poisson’s ratio”[54,55]) to 0.5 in the plastic regime was observed (Figure f).The second batch of samples was
strained perpendicular to the CD.
The observed deformation mechanisms differ strongly from the first
batch. The most obvious difference is that no long-range cracks occur.
As shown in Figure e,f, the PET foil is under compressive strain in the transverse direction.
Because most of the NWs are aligned perpendicular to the straining
direction, the NWs are subjected to compressive stress rather than
tensile stress. As a consequence, triangular kinks (or in-plane buckles)
and boat-like structures form, depending on the local network structure
(yellow and green highlights in Figure a and schematics in Figure b,c). This is also observed in the first
batch, which was strained parallel to the CD, for those rare NWs oriented
perpendicular to the straining direction, as can be seen from Figure d. In cases where
several parallel NWs are compressed (see Figure a,e), the deformed NWs are reminiscent of
kink bands, which form in layered crystals when compressed parallel
to their layers.[56−58] Because the dominating deformation mechanisms differ
from the first batch, the electrical performance of the TCEs highly
differs, too. The relative resistance increase is significantly smaller,
when the sample is strained perpendicular to the CD, because the percolation
of the network is maintained up to high strain levels. This is clearly
visible in the overview SEM image in Figure d. Even though a slight resistance increase
of ΔR/R0 = 0.2
± 0.07 is already observed at 5% strain, the change of ΔR/R0 at 20% strain is only 2.4
± 0.5, which is almost one order of magnitude lower compared
to samples strained to the same extent in the CD. Keeping in mind
that the initial sheet resistance is 10 Ω/sq, the TCE sustains
a high conductivity at 20% strain. The resistance increase based purely
on geometric considerations can be calculated as ΔR/R0 = 2ε + ε2.[59] At 20% strain this corresponds to a relative
resistance increase of 0.44. Moreover, because of the compressive
stress in the transverse direction, the resistance in this direction
slightly decreases during straining, and the evolution of both batches
is comparable (see Figure S3).
Figure 4
Deformation
of NW35 networks strained perpendicular to the CD.
(a) Close-up of kinked NWs at 10% tensile strain. Boat-like structures
(green highlight) and triangular kinks (yellow) are observed. (b and
c) Schematic kink formation due to transverse compressive stress.
(d) SEM image of a NW network strained to 20% perpendicular to the
CD illustrating the high degree of percolation at this strain level
(image taken under load). (d) Close-up of an area in panel c showing
kink formation and local fracture.
Deformation
of NW35 networks strained perpendicular to the CD.
(a) Close-up of kinked NWs at 10% tensile strain. Boat-like structures
(green highlight) and triangular kinks (yellow) are observed. (b and
c) Schematic kink formation due to transverse compressive stress.
(d) SEM image of a NW network strained to 20% perpendicular to the
CD illustrating the high degree of percolation at this strain level
(image taken under load). (d) Close-up of an area in panel c showing
kink formation and local fracture.The results presented in Figures –4 show that the electrical
performance of a NW network is closely connected to its mechanical
deformation behavior. In general, the deformation can be categorized
into three basic deformation modes. Mode A is tensile fracture of
NWs, which is the dominant mode, when the network is stretched parallel
to the CD. Mode B is kink formation of NWs due to compressive strain.
This is the dominant mode observed for stretching perpendicular to
the CD. In contrast to the first two modes, which also occur for single
NWs (see below), the third mode occurs only in dense NW networks and
can be described as nanowire bending, similar to the conditions in
a three-point bending test (see Figure S4). This mode is a combination of modes A and B and is caused by the
influence of surrounding and attached NWs. To gain a deeper understanding
of these deformation modes and the crystal defects involved, a detailed
microscopic study was performed and interpreted with the help of MD
simulations.The deformation under tensile strain (mode A) is
further investigated
by in situ TEM tests of single NWs and SEM tensile
tests of sparse NW networks (Figure ). When a sparse network on
a PET foil is subjected to tensile strain, isolated NWs oriented parallel
to the loading direction show multiple periodic fracture events as
revealed in Figure c for a strain of 50%. The defects involved in deformation mode A
were further investigated at nanometer scale by in situ TEM tensile tests of single NWs with diameters between 65 and 300
nm in displacement-controlled mode (strain rates in the range of 0.8–2
nm/sec). The wires were transferred on a push-to-pull (PTP) device
and fixed on both ends with carbon patches deposited in a focused
ion beam (FIB) instrument (Figure a). All tested NWs first show nucleation of defects
distributed along the gauge length, followed by highly localized deformation
and necking at one region.[60] Subsequently,
the NWs fracture at this location (Figure e–h). The fractured ends are tapered,
which is indicative of ductile fracture. In situ (S)TEM
imaging directly reveals the formation of stacking faults (SF) on
slip planes inclined to the NW axis (Figure e–h and SI Movie 2). In the micrographs extracted from the in situ videos the SFs appear as straight line contrast (see Figure e–h). In order to provide
evidence of the nucleation of SFs upon straining, individual SFs are
highlighted in the two STEM images of Figure g. As the NW was strained further, a new
SF was formed, highlighted in yellow. Moreover, due to the five-fold
twinned structure slip systems in different twin segments are activated
(see Figure S5). The angle between two
SFs is measured as ∼70° which corresponds to the angle
between different {111} slip planes. SFs are formed by nucleation
and glide of Shockley partial dislocations which then interact with
the TBs of the NW. The role of the TBs and details of dislocation
reactions are further investigated by MD simulation (see below). However,
already from the experimental images it is evident that under tension
no deformation twinning as in the case of single crystalline fcc wires
occurs.[61] From the engineering stress–strain
curve in Figure b,
the yield strength of the NW with a diameter of 215 nm is estimated
to be 740 MPa, applying the 0.2% strain criterion. The engineering
yield strain is about 1.5%. The serrated curve indicates sudden dislocation
bursts, which are likely associated with the TBs acting as barriers
for dislocations and thus require higher stresses for dislocation
transmission or nucleation of new dislocations. After the onset of
yielding, the stress slightly increases, further indicating moderate
strain hardening, which can be attributed to the presence of TBs and
stored defects.[62−64] The ultimate tensile strength is 820 MPa at a strain
of 3%, which is in good agreement with previous results reported in
the literature.[62,63] Pronounced necking occurs in
a highly localized region (Figure h), where a small wire segment is then locally strained
up to double its initial length. The corresponding NW fractured at
an engineering strain of about 7%. Compared to polycrystalline bulk
silver with a coarse-grained microstructure with a yield strength
of 55 MPa,[65] the five-fold twinned NWs
show a more than one order of magnitude increased yield strength.
This size effect of strength in the submicrometer range is well-known
and reported in the literature for thin films, pillars, wires, and
whiskers.[66,67] The effect is explained by dislocation starvation,
dislocation source truncation, and exhaustion hardening.[66] In twinned NWs the size effect is determined
not only by the NW diameter, but also by the TB spacing. This is supported
in the literature by tensile tests of AgNWs with TBs along the ⟨112⟩
wire axis that suggested that the size effect of strength is dominated
by the size of the largest twin segment.[68] Regarding the elastic properties of the NW, a Young’s modulus
of ∼70 GPa can be estimated from the in situ TEM experiment using the initial slope of the stress–strain
curve. This is slightly smaller than the bulk modulus of Ag in the
[101] direction (83.8 GPa)[60], but comparable
with values extracted from other in situ studies
of AgNWs.[68]Ductile fracture of NWs
under tensile stress (deformation mode
A). (a) SEM image of a single AgNW glued on a PTP device for in situ tensile testing. (b) Representative engineering
stress–strain curve for a wire with a diameter of 215 nm. The
yield strength σ of the wire is
about 14 times higher than for bulk Ag indicating a strong size effect.
(c) Single NWs illustrating failure due to multiple tensile fracture.
(d) Bright-field (BF) TEM image of a sparse network strained up to
25% elongation illustrating the local deformation with necking and
ductile fracture. (e–h) STEM images of an in situ tensile test of a AgNW (d = 65 nm). Stacking faults
that formed by partial dislocations on {111} planes are indicated
by red arrows. (g) Two close-ups of the area marked with a blue frame
in panel f. A new stacking fault is highlighted in yellow. (h) The
fractured NW ends are tapered because of localized necking. (i) Average
crack spacing of dense and sparse NW35 networks as a function of tensile
strain.Localized deformation and necking
of NWs is observed in the network,
too, as it is clearly seen in the BF TEM image in Figure d. Additionally, the crack
spacing as a function of the global tensile strain has been compared
for sparse networks (Figure c) and dense networks (Figure c). In both cases, the average crack spacing (λc) shows a significant decay with a saturation
around 50% tensile strain (Figure i). This evolution of crack spacing is also observed
for thin films under tensile straining.[41,51] In the dense
NW network, λc amounts to 1.8 ±
0.6 μm for 10% tensile strain, and it decreases to 1.2 ±
0.4 μm for 50% strain (Figure i). The crack spacing of sparse NW networks is always
slightly larger. This can be attributed to the increased mutual interaction
of NWs in a dense network supporting local stress concentration, crack
deflection, and correlated rupture.The second deformation mode
(mode B) that was identified in the
straining experiments on NW networks is kink formation, which results
from compressive stresses induced by the transverse contraction of
the PET substrate during uniaxial straining (Figure e,f).[41,48,51] This mode can be observed in pure form in single NWs oriented perpendicular
to the straining direction, which experience compressive stress without
being affected by adjacent NWs or NW junctions (Figure ). Regarding the NWs deformed in compression,
a key finding is the formation of periodic triangular kinks, which
results in a serrated NW structure (Figure a). This is in contrast to previous studies
of Ag-coated PVB-nanofibers, Si NWs, and carbon nanotubes on prestrained
polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), where sinusoidal buckling was observed
under compressive stress.[48,69−71] In the elastic regime the buckling is assumed to be controlled by
the NW radius and the Young’s moduli of the NW and the substrate.[70] Because PET is a thermoplastic and PDMS an elastomer,
the Young’s moduli differ by more than 3 orders of magnitude
with PDMS being much more compliant. This might be part of the reason
for the different behavior. As discussed above, the NWs show a strong
adhesion to the PET, which is also assumed to promote local strain
concentrations and therefore kink formation. However, with respect
to devices, strong coupling of NWs to the substrate is often highly
desirable to prevent delamination, out-of-plane buckling, and possible
short circuits. Moreover, the kink formation of the AgNWs observed
in the present work is largely controlled by plastic deformation involving
formation of crystal defects. For plastic deformation, the five-fold
twinned structure of the NWs plays a key role favoring local kinking
by GB formation, as discussed in more detail below. It is noteworthy
that the NWs show an extremely high plastic deformability under compression.
In contrast, single crystalline fcc NWs are expected to show shear
failure under compression by dislocation slip.[60,72] Upon extended straining, the NWs form kinks with increasing acute
angles without failing by fracture (Figure a,b). A high deformability of five-fold twinned
AgNWs under compression was also observed by Vlassov et al.[73] during in situ SEM bending
tests. However, beside kink formation these authors also observed
crack initiation at the point of the highest curvature. For our sparse
networks we quantified the evolution of kink geometry as a function
of strain by evaluating the kink angle (αK) and kink distance (dK), as illustrated
in Figure b and plotted
in Figure c. The average
kink angle decreases from 116 ± 17° at 10% strain to 70
± 39° at 50% strain, while the kink distance decreases from
2.5 μm at 10% strain to 1.0 μm at 50% strain. Interestingly,
even in the case of local fracture no gaps between fractured ends
occur. Rather, sliding of the fractured ends in combination with cold-welding
takes place. This is clearly visible from the HAADF image in Figure d, which furthermore
shows that the NW cross section is largely retained in the welded
zones. This finding is of key importance in view of the application
of such NW networks as flexible electrodes, because the cold-welded
kinks are assumed to still be electrically conductive.
Figure 6
Kink formation in NWs
under compression (deformation mode B). (a)
Single NW after 40% tensile straining of the PET foil perpendicular
to the wire orientation illustrating the formation of periodic triangular
kinks. (b) The NW kink geometry is defined by the kink angle αK and the kink distance dK. (c) Evolution of the mean kink angle and distance as
a function of tensile strain. (d) High-angle annular dark-field (HAADF)
STEM image of a triangular kink at 25% strain showing cold-welding
after fracture. The micrographs were taken after unloading of the
samples.
Kink formation in NWs
under compression (deformation mode B). (a)
Single NW after 40% tensile straining of the PET foil perpendicular
to the wire orientation illustrating the formation of periodic triangular
kinks. (b) The NW kink geometry is defined by the kink angle αK and the kink distance dK. (c) Evolution of the mean kink angle and distance as
a function of tensile strain. (d) High-angle annular dark-field (HAADF)
STEM image of a triangular kink at 25% strain showing cold-welding
after fracture. The micrographs were taken after unloading of the
samples.
HRTEM Studies of Kink Formation
and Related Defect Structures
Here, we focus further on the
analysis of defects involved in the
formation of triangular kinks by means of TEM and MD simulation. The
TEM image in Figure a shows part of a AgNW network, which was originally coated on a
PET substrate and strained ex situ to 25% tensile
strain perpendicular to the CD. After straining, the network was released
from the PET substrate for plan-view TEM investigation. From the TEM
micrograph it can be seen that several NWs aligned parallel to the
straining direction fractured in tension. The NWs oriented perpendicular
to the aforementioned deformed by kinking. In the following, we focus
on the area marked by a blue frame, where two parallel NWs formed
correlated kinks with identical kink angles of αk ≈ 135°. The HRTEM image of this area (Figure b) shows that the
kinks are composed of sharp GBs, where most of the defects accumulate.
In the top NW, two grain boundaries (GB1, GB2) are present in the
kinked region to accommodate for the deformation, whereas the thinner
NW below shows only one grain boundary (GB3). The difference is probably
caused by the constraint the lower NW puts on the deformation of the
top NW, enforcing a larger radius of curvature in the kinked region.
Moreover, the top NW is thicker compared to the lower one, further
supporting a larger radius of curvature. In order to determine the
nature of the grain boundary GB1, local fast Fourier transformation
(FFT) is employed. The FFTs at each side of the GB (Figure c) are identical, but they
are rotated by 20.5° relative to each other (the FFTs show the
same NW orientation as the DP in Figure e). This means that GB1 is a pure tilt grain
boundary in this segment of the five-fold twinned NW. The enlarged
HRTEM image of grain boundary GB1 in Figure c reveals a periodic dislocation contrast
along the GB. These dislocations likely nucleated at the top surface
of the NW as a result of tensile stress due to bending and aligned
on top of each other, thus forming the tilt GB. The average distance
between two dislocations is measured as d = 0.83 nm. If the dislocations possess a Burgers vector b, the distance d between dislocations
is related to the tilt angle of the GB via Frank’s rule: .[74] Assuming
full dislocations with Burgers vector a/2⟨110⟩,
the calculated tilt angle is 20°, which is in almost perfect
agreement with the tilt angle (20.5°) directly measured from
the HRTEM image by evaluating the relative rotation of the crystal
lattices across the GB. Moreover, GB2 has the same orientation as
GB1 and a tilt angle of 24° (see Figure S1).
Figure 7
HRTEM analysis of triangular kinks. (a) TEM BF image of a AgNW
network strained perpendicular to the CD (25% tensile strain, unloaded)
revealing characteristic kink formation. (b) Close-up of the kinked
wires in panel a illustrating GB formation. Triangular defects at
the end of the formed GB are marked with blue dashed lines. (c) HRTEM
image of the wire in panel b marked with a green square depicting
single dislocations at the grain boundary. The insets show the FFTs
of the wire on the left and right side of the GB. The scale bar is
10 nm–1. The schematic NW cross-section illustrates
the orientation with respect to the electron beam (green arrow). (d)
BF TEM image of a kink with a V-defect at the NW top. (e) Close-up
of the V-defect in panel d. The GB dissociates along two inclined
{111} planes similar to the case of “chevron defects”
reported in the literature.[75] The scale
bars in the FFTs correspond to 10 nm–1. (f) Schematic
of a kink illustrating the involved defect structures.
HRTEM analysis of triangular kinks. (a) TEM BF image of a AgNW
network strained perpendicular to the CD (25% tensile strain, unloaded)
revealing characteristic kink formation. (b) Close-up of the kinked
wires in panel a illustrating GB formation. Triangular defects at
the end of the formed GB are marked with blue dashed lines. (c) HRTEM
image of the wire in panel b marked with a green square depicting
single dislocations at the grain boundary. The insets show the FFTs
of the wire on the left and right side of the GB. The scale bar is
10 nm–1. The schematic NW cross-section illustrates
the orientation with respect to the electron beam (green arrow). (d)
BF TEM image of a kink with a V-defect at the NW top. (e) Close-up
of the V-defect in panel d. The GB dissociates along two inclined
{111} planes similar to the case of “chevron defects”
reported in the literature.[75] The scale
bars in the FFTs correspond to 10 nm–1. (f) Schematic
of a kink illustrating the involved defect structures.Another interesting observation is that both NWs in Figure a,b show a triangular-shaped
defect at the bottom of the kink where the kink forms an acute angle.
This defect occurs at the end of the formed GB. During NW bending
and kink formation, tensile and compressive stresses occur above and
below the neutral plane, respectively. The highest compressive stress
appears in the concave region at the bottom of the NW. Obviously,
defect processes are initiated which redistribute excess material
into a triangular-shaped subgrain. Another significant feature of
the kinked wires is a V-shaped defect at the intersection of the GB
with the free surface on the convex side of the kink (cf. schematic in Figure f). The V-defect occurs in the part of the NW that is under tensile
stress (e.g., Figure d, area marked by blue frame). From the HRTEM image
in Figure e, the GB
is again identified as a pure tilt grain boundary with a tilt angle
of 50°, as can be deduced from the two FFTs taken on either side
of the boundary (see Figure S1). Similar V-defects were observed by HRTEM in gold at the
intersection of a 90° ⟨110⟩ tilt GB with a free
surface.[75,76] Such “chevron defects” have
been interpreted as energetically favorable surface reconstructions
of the GB. In the same way, the GB in the AgNWs dissociates near the
surface, and the boundary splits into two inclined boundaries parallel
to the (111) planes, as clearly revealed in Figure e. The height of the V-defect is about 2
nm. Because V-defects involve stacking faults (see also atomistic
simulation, Figure ), the driving force for the formation of these defects is expected
to be closely related to the stacking fault energy (γsf). In fact, the chevron-defect mentioned above has been
observed in Au (γsf = 32 mJ/m2), but not in Al, which shows a more than four times larger
stacking fault energy (146 mJ/m2). Ag has an even lower
stacking fault energy (16 mJ/m2)[77] than Au, which is expected to further support the formation of V-defects.
This explains the energetic stability of formed V-defects. Moreover,
in a previous MD study[78] on [110] single
crystalline Au NWs formation of a similar defect structure, a wedge-shaped
twin was observed in the tensile strained part of the NWs under bending.
We think that V-defects play an important role in the excellent mechanical
deformability and electrical integrity of AgNWs under compressive
and bending stresses.
Figure 8
MD simulation results of five-fold twinned AgNWs under
different
loading conditions. (a) Fractured AgNW under tension at 5.97% strain.
Only atoms belonging to TBs and defects are shown here. Surface mesh
is half-transparent. The inset shows the pore formation at the zoomed-in
fractured end. The NW is sliced and visualized according to the schematic
in the inset to illustrate internal defects; only dark green parts
are visible. The outer-layer atoms are removed. Atoms are colored
according to the common neighbor analysis. Green, red, and white atoms
indicate fcc, hcp, and unidentified structural types, respectively.
(b) Deformed configuration with bending angle θ = 19.8°
after bending test along bending direction (BD) I and 400 ps relaxation
after load removal. The inset shows the formation of tilt GB and V-defect.
The GB penetrates from G3 to G2 and dissociates at the V-defect in
G1 along two conjugated {111} planes. The V-defect consists of a wedge-shaped
twin and stacking faults.
MD simulation results of five-fold twinned AgNWs under
different
loading conditions. (a) Fractured AgNW under tension at 5.97% strain.
Only atoms belonging to TBs and defects are shown here. Surface mesh
is half-transparent. The inset shows the pore formation at the zoomed-in
fractured end. The NW is sliced and visualized according to the schematic
in the inset to illustrate internal defects; only dark green parts
are visible. The outer-layer atoms are removed. Atoms are colored
according to the common neighbor analysis. Green, red, and white atoms
indicate fcc, hcp, and unidentified structural types, respectively.
(b) Deformed configuration with bending angle θ = 19.8°
after bending test along bending direction (BD) I and 400 ps relaxation
after load removal. The inset shows the formation of tilt GB and V-defect.
The GB penetrates from G3 to G2 and dissociates at the V-defect in
G1 along two conjugated {111} planes. The V-defect consists of a wedge-shaped
twin and stacking faults.To compare with literature, Hwang et al.[79] performed cyclic bending fatigue tests on five-fold twinned AgNWs
and observed the formation of subgrain boundaries in wavy buckles.
They proposed that the subgrains form because of geometrically necessary
dislocations (GNDs), but they could not resolve the dislocations by
TEM. Furthermore, Wang et al.[80,81] used multiply twinned
⟨112⟩-Ni NWs for studying the mechanically induced GB
formation under bending. They observed the formation of low-angle
GBs, which consist of randomly distributed dislocations in a diffuse
GB layer. Further bending evoked lattice distortion, followed by dynamic
recovery and formation of high-angle GBs. In our study on AgNWs, the
formed high-angle GBs show a narrow GB zone, where the dislocations
arrange in a wall, as revealed in Figure c. Recently, Zhao et al.[82] studied the geometrical constraints in five-fold twinned
AgNW kinks, which formed in bending tests. Using scanning nanobeam
electron diffraction, they analyzed the orientation of the GBs and
found, consistent with our results, that pure tilt GBs form.
Atomistic
Simulations of Nanowire Deformation and Failure
To further
understand the deformation mechanisms of AgNWs on the
atomic scale, we performed MD simulations on individual NWs with diameter
of 15.2 nm put under tensile and bending strain (see Figure S6 for the MD simulation setup). In the case of the
simulated tensile test, the plastic deformation is carried mainly
by nucleation of leading partial dislocations at the free surface
and multiplication of these dislocations at the TBs. Under tension,
the Schmid factor of the leading partial dislocation on the primary
slip systems in ⟨110⟩-oriented NWs is two times higher
than that of the trailing partial dislocation; therefore, the nucleation
of leading partial dislocations is more favorable.[61,72] Plasticity is initiated at a strain of 3.56% (see Figure S7b). The TBs strengthen the AgNW by impeding the propagation
of partial dislocations (see Figure S7).
This explains the observed accumulation of stacking faults in the in situ TEM tests and the strain-hardening noticed in the
stress–strain curve (see Figure ). Moreover, a pore forms close to the quintuple line
in the region where fracture occurs. As already revealed in our earlier
MD study,[60] this pore formation can be
attributed to the evolution of positive hydrostatic pressure (tension)
in the wire center upon tensile loading. The stress field associated
with the central wedge disinclination is in the unloaded state negative
(compression) in the axial and radial directions, but due to the elastic
anisotropy of silver changes to tensile upon loading. As a result,
defect processes are initiated which result in the pore formation.[60] In contrast to deformation twinning-mediated
plasticity in ⟨110⟩-oriented single-crystalline NWs
under tensile strain,[61,72] five-fold twinned AgNWs show
strongly localized plastic deformation, as illustrated in Figure a. The plastic localization
phenomena in the AgNWs can be attributed to the five-fold symmetry
of the crystallographic arrangement. The pre-existing TBs truncate
slip planes, resulting in an enclosed five-fold symmetric slip system,
as illustrated in Figure S6b; thus, the
possibilities for dislocation glide along the primary slip planes
are restricted in a confined region. The deformation process of the
simulated AgNW under tension is shown in SI Movie 3.In the case of the simulated bending test, plasticity
is initiated by nucleation of partial dislocations from the tensile
part, followed by nucleation of full dislocations from the compressive
part (see SI Movie 4). This transition
of deformation mechanism upon changing the loading condition can be
explained by the interchange in Schmid factor between leading and
trailing partial dislocations.[72] In the
compressive part of the NW, dislocations on the different slip planes
interact with each other by forming dislocation locks containing sessile
dislocations.[77] The interlocked dislocation
networks act as a barrier to the glide of further dislocations, and
these dislocations accumulate in the incipient GB region. The accumulation
of further dislocations at the GB region results at a bending angle
of 19.8° in a tilt GB (see Figures b and S8) in agreement
with our HRTEM observations (Figure c). Moreover, the formation of a V-defect at the top
of the NW was also observed in the MD simulations (Figures b and S8). Both flanks of the V-defect are composed of micro twins,
which are created by partial dislocations under tensile strain on
two conjugated slip systems. A similar mechanism was revealed in our
previous MD simulations of bending tests on ⟨110⟩-oriented
Cu and Au single-crystalline NWs.[78] In
contrast to the single-crystalline NWs, which show pseudoelasticity
after load removal,[78] kink formation hinders
the unbending process of the five-fold twinned AgNW (see SI Movie 4), which implies a better reversibility
upon bend deformation of single-crystalline NWs. The bent AgNWs in
BD II and III (see Figure S8) show resulting
defects similar to the wire bent in BD I. In addition, the triangular-shaped
defect in the compressive part of bent NWs, which was identified by
HRTEM (see Figure b), was also observed in the simulated NWs with large bending angle
(θ > 30°) (see Figure S8).
Impact of Network Anisotropy on Mechanical and Electrical Failure
On the basis of our experimental observations and atomistic simulations,
we propose a simplified model which explains the strong impact of
network anisotropy on the deformation and failure of highly textured
AgNW network electrodes (Figure ). Depending on the NW orientation with respect to
the applied load, deformation under tensile strain, kink formation
in compression, or bending takes place. Because of the interconnection
of NWs in a network, the deformation of a NW in the network can often
be described as a combination of these three deformation modes. However,
when a highly textured network is strained in the direction of the
preferred wire orientation (coating direction, CD), most of the NWs
fail in tensile mode. Periodic cracks in the network form, which eventually
lead to a loss of percolation. As a result, a significant increase
in the resistance along the straining direction is already observed
at moderate strain values (Figure ). In contrast, when the strain is applied perpendicular
to the preferred wire orientation, most of the NWs deform in compression
and form kinks, which sustain a percolated network. Therefore, a low
resistance is retained up to high strains. This is exactly the behavior
that we observed in our resistance measurements of highly textured
NW networks under uniaxial straining (Figure ). In the illustration of the model in Figure , only two wire orientations,
parallel and perpendicular to the CD, are depicted for simplicity.
After coating, most of the NWs are aligned in the CD and only a few
are perpendicular (center). Straining parallel and perpendicular to
the CD leads to the described behavior, as illustrated in the left
and right parts of the Figure , respectively. In a real network, NWs also appear in inclined
directions, thus experiencing a combination of tensile and compressive
strain. However, this does not change the overall behavior of the
NW network and is therefore neglected in the simplified sketch in Figure .
Figure 9
A simplified model of
the deformation mechanism of a highly textured
NW network. The network structure at 0% strain is depicted in the
center. The coating process of the NWs causes a preferential orientation
of the NWs in the CD. On the left side the network is strained parallel
to the preferred wire orientation. As a result long-range periodic
cracks form and deteriorate the electrical percolation of the network.
On the right side the network is strained perpendicular to the preferred
wire orientation. Because of the formation of kink structures, a high
percolation is maintained. For simplicity, only NWs parallel and perpendicular
to the CD are displayed in the model.
A simplified model of
the deformation mechanism of a highly textured
NW network. The network structure at 0% strain is depicted in the
center. The coating process of the NWs causes a preferential orientation
of the NWs in the CD. On the left side the network is strained parallel
to the preferred wire orientation. As a result long-range periodic
cracks form and deteriorate the electrical percolation of the network.
On the right side the network is strained perpendicular to the preferred
wire orientation. Because of the formation of kink structures, a high
percolation is maintained. For simplicity, only NWs parallel and perpendicular
to the CD are displayed in the model.
Conclusions
The microscopic deformation and failure modes
of anisotropic networks
of five-fold twinned AgNWs prepared by doctor blading on PET substrates
were studied under uniaxial straining. The results were directly correlated
with changes in resistance of the networks, which is the key electrical
performance parameter for their use as transparent conductive electrodes.
The straining tests revealed a strong impact of the network anisotropy,
which manifested itself in a one order of magnitude lower increase
in resistance for networks strained perpendicular to the CD compared
to networks strained parallel to the CD. The reason for the pronounced
influence of network anisotropy on the maintained degree of percolation
could be ascribed to the anisotropic mechanical deformation behavior
of NWs aligned along different directions in the network. When the
straining direction is parallel to the CD and thus to the preferential
NW orientation, many NWs fail by tensile fracture. Because this occurs
in a correlated way, long-range cracks are formed, which strongly
reduces the percolation. For the network strained perpendicular to
the CD, due to the effect of transverse contraction of the PET substrate,
the majority of NWs is deformed in compression. Such NWs show kink
formation without complete rupture, thus leaving the electrical percolation
of the network largely intact. The characteristic microscopic deformation
modes were further studied by in situ TEM experiments
on single NWs, straining tests on sparse NW networks, HRTEM investigations
of defect structures, and complementary MD simulations. We identified
three fundamental deformation modes of five-fold twinned Ag NWs, namely,
fracture due to tensile straining (mode A), kink formation as result
of transverse compressive strain (mode B), and bending of NWs which
experience additional constraints in the NW network (mode A+B). It
is noteworthy that the AgNWs show highly localized deformation under
all three modes, both in the experiments and in MD simulations. The
reason for this is the 5-fold twinned microstructure of the NWs, which
strongly affects dislocation glide and multiplication. Under tension,
the plastic deformation is mainly carried by partial dislocations
causing pronounced necking, whereby the TBs strengthen the NWs by
hindering dislocation glide. Under compressive strain, the nucleation
and slip of full dislocations govern the plasticity and contribute
to the formation of kinks. The accumulation of dislocations at the
interlocked dislocation networks leads to the formation of tilt GBs
in the NW kink. V-shaped defects form at the termination of the GBs
with the free surface and probably promote suppression of detrimental
crack initiation on the convex side of the kink, where large tensile
stresses occur. Because generation of V-defects involves partial dislocations
and stacking faults, the extremely low stacking fault energy of Ag
is expected to support the formation of these advantageous structural
features. Finally, at high compressive strains where NW fracture cannot
be completely suppressed, cold welding takes place and keeps the fractured
parts of NWs in intimate contact, thus retaining their contribution
to electrical percolation. In summary, we identified several advantageous
properties of five-fold twinned AgNW networks regarding their microscopic
deformation mechanisms and defect processes as well as the role of
NW network anisotropy on mechanical and electrical performance. We
expect that these detailed microscopic insights contribute to further
improve fabrication and design strategies for transparent NW network
electrodes for flexible and stretchable devices.
Methods
AgNW Network
Fabrication
All AgNW networks were doctor
bladed (Zehntner GmbH) under ambient conditions in air. NW dispersions
were purchased from Cambrios Film Solutions (ClearOhm Ink-NKA) and
from RAS AG (ECOS X3). According to their average wire diameter, the
Cambrios NWs are labeled NW35 and the ECOS NWs NW85 in this article.
A PET foil (Goodfellow GmbH) with a thickness of 23 μm was used
as a flexible substrate. For doctor blading, the PET foil was attached
to a glass slide with PDMS as adhesive layer. The PDMS solution was
mixed with a curing agent (Dow Corning, Sylgard 184) at a ratio of
10:1 and afterwards degassed in vacuum for 10 min to remove any gas
bubbles. To cure the PDMS it is annealed at 95 °C for 3 h. For
the fabrication of NW networks, both NW dispersions were used undiluted
and coated at 40 °C. The NW35 were coated with a speed of 1 mm/s
and annealed at 100 °C for 3 min. The NW85 were coated with 3
mm/s and annealed at 100 °C for 4 min. Sparse networks were fabricated
by diluting the NW35 with DI water in a ratio of 1:15 and coated with
the same parameters as the dense networks. For SEM investigations
the sparse networks and the dense networks, which were not tested
electrically, were coated with carbon after mechanical testing by
evaporation of carbon threads. To perform TEM investigations the AgNWs
were coated on top of a sacrificial layer of PEDOT:PSS. PEDOT:PSS
(Al 4083, Heraeus) was diluted with isopropanol in a ratio of 1:1,
and the wetting agent Capstone FS-31 (DuPontTM) was added in a concentration
of 0.1% with respect to the PEDOT content. Doctor blading was conducted
at 60 °C, and the annealing step was performed at 150 °C
for 5 min. By diluting the sacrificial layer of PEDOT in water, the
NW network was transferred onto a TEM lacey grid.
SEM Straining
Tests Combined with Electrical Measurements
For SEM straining
tests a custom-built straining stage was designed.
With a fine thread (M6x1) the displacment during a straining step
was applied. For the electrical measurements a van der Pauw setup
was used, and four copper wires were placed in a square with a side
length of 16.6 mm. The electrical measurements were performed with
a Keithely Series 2400 source meter. For all measurements the sweep
range was set from −0.1 to 0.1 A. For the electrical measurements
parallel and perpendicular to the straining direction, six samples
were measured for each direction and averaged. The error bars represent
the standard deviation for these measurements. In addition, the sheet
resistance was measured on glass substrates as a reference. The SEM
investigations were performed with a Thermo Fisher Helios Nanolab
660 dual beam FIB/SEM system and a Phenom ProX Destop SEM. The local
strain during a tensile test was determined via feature tracking.
The script was written in Python 3.6, and feature tracking routines
of the openCV software library were implemented. The wire orientation
of the NW networks, i.e. the PDFs, was analyzed via
the directionality plugin, which is based on the local gradient orientation,
of the open source software ImageJ. For the evaluation of the crack
spacing of the dense and sparse networks more than 300 measurements
were taken, and for the evaluation of the kink angle and kink distance
more than 100 measurements were taken.
In Situ TEM Tensile Tests
and HRTEM Analysis
The AgNWs
for in situ tensile tests of single NWs were synthesized
using the polyol reduction as it is described in our previous publication
by Göbelt et al.[83] The straining
tests were performed with a Hysitron PI 95 TEM PicoIndenter (Bruker).
The NW dispersions were drop-cast onto photolithographically patterned
Si wafers. Afterward, the transfer of a single NW onto a push-to-pull
device was performed inside a FIB instrument. The Easy Lift manipulator
was used for the transfer, and the carbon gas injection system (GIS)
was used to attach the NW to the manipulator and for the fixation
of the NWs on the PTP device. The gauge length was 2.5 μm, and
the misalignment of the wires relative to the loading direction was
less than 5°. The straining tests were conducted in displacement-controlled
mode (0.8–2 nm/s). The TEM studies were performed with a double-aberration-corrected
Thermo Fisher Titan Themis3 at 200 and 300 kV in STEM and
TEM modes. The stress–strain curve of a single NW is calculated
as engineering stress–strain curve, which refers to the initial
length L0 and cross-sectional area A0 of the tested NW. For L0, the gauge length corresponding to the initial distance between
the carbon clamps on the PTP device is used, whereas A0 is calculated from the initial diameter D0 of the NW via A0 = (5D02/8)·sin(72°), assuming
a pentagonal NW shape.
MD Simulations
Atomistic simulations
were performed
on [101]-oriented five-fold twinned AgNWs. To mimic the cross-sectional
shape of AgNWs in the experiments (Figure d), the sharp corners of the pentagonal cross
section were rounded (see Figure S6a).
A rough AgNW surface was modeled by randomly removing one-third of
atoms in the two outermost surface layers. By adding surface roughness,
the applied stress required to activate dislocations at the free surface
is reduced to a level comparable to experiments.[84] The diameter d of all tested wires was
15.2 nm. The atomic interaction was modeled using an embedded-atom-method
(EAM) potential for Ag.[85] The wires were
equilibrated at 600 K for 10 ps and then quenched by FIRE[86] to an equilibrium configuration followed by
a thermal equilibration at 300 K for 200 ps. Uniaxial tensile tests
were performed on AgNW (d = 15.2 nm, length l = 450.9 nm) with periodic boundary conditions (PBC) along
the wire axis. The simulation was performed at 300 K with the Nosé–Hoover
thermostat[87] and at a constant strain rate
ε̇ = 1 × 108 s–1. Force-controlled
bending tests were performed on AgNW (d = 15.2 nm, l = 74.6 nm). The wire was investigated to account for three
bending directions (BD) with respect to the five-fold twinned AgNW
structure (Figure S6a,c). For more details
of the bending simulation method, see Nöhring et al.[78] Simulations were performed at 300 K with the
Nosé–Hoover thermostat, and applied forces were increased
by Ḟbend = 300 N/s. The applied
forces were then instantaneously removed, and the wires were relaxed
for 400 ps at 300 K. All simulations were performed using the MD software
package IMD.[88] The defect structures were
analyzed using common neighbor analysis,[89] coordination number, and the dislocation extraction algorithm[90] as implemented in the atomistic visualization
tool OVITO.[91]
Authors: Yongbeom Seo; Byoung Soo Kim; William C Ballance; Natalie Aw; Brad Sutton; Hyunjoon Kong Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 9.229